«123456»Seite
6 articles, page 1 of 6

From the Editor’s Desk

A Good Start: Deutsches Ärzteblatt Gets Its First Impact Factor

Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107(40): 693; DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0693

Baethge, C

A few weeks ago, Deutsches Ärzteblatt was given its first impact factor, with a value of 1.099. This sets Deutsches Ärzteblatt squarely in the middle of the 133 general medical journals from around the world that Thomson Reuters, the publisher of the impact factor, includes in its category “Medicine, General and Internal.” A good start!

Strictly speaking, the impact factor was not assigned to Deutsches Ärzteblatt itself, but to the online journal that you are now reading, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, which includes all of the articles published in German under the heading Medizin (“Medicine”) in full English translation. Thus, all of the medical-scientific articles that have undergone our review process are published in English in Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. The online sister publication was founded by Deutsches Ärzteblatt in 2008 so that our articles could be indexed in the major medical databases, such as Medline as well as, indeed, Web of Science and Journal Citation Report. This was by no means an end in itself: the purpose was, rather, to enable us to present our readers with scientific articles of even higher quality. It has become difficult for any journal that is not represented in the major databases to acquire good authors, researchers today being subject to the constant pressure of evaluations which, in turn, employ the impact factor as their main instrument. There is some debate at present about this type of evaluation, and about the impact factor itself (16). Nonetheless, no researcher and no editor of a scientific journal can afford to ignore the impact factor, as this ostensibly simple, and therefore alluring, statistic has already become immensely popular among the research bureaucracy.

We are glad, therefore, to be able to offer our authors not just the huge medical readership of Deutsches Ärzteblatt with its weekly circulation of 400 000 copies (which surely constitutes its true “impact”), but also bilinguality, visibility in Medline, and now an impact factor as well.

The new journal, Deutsches Ärzteblatt Internationl, is unusual for its bilinguality. Accordingly, the impact factor it has just received is unusual as well. As with all newly founded journals, the impact factor for the first year is a one-year impact factor, i.e., it is based on citations drawn from one publication year (2008, in this case), rather than two. Furthermore, problems arising from bilinguality unfortunately led to the lack of consideration of at least 69.6% (7) of all citations of scientific articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt's section “Medicine” in other medical journals. This, along with the large number of letters to the editor that we are happy to publish, far more than in other journals, led to a non-representative distortion of the percentage of self-citations. In order to keep such artifacts from arising in the future, we kindly ask all authors of scientific papers to cite scientific articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt exclusively in their English version.

Conflict of interest statement
The author is Chief Scientific Editor of Deutsches Ärzteblatt and Deutsches Ärzteblatt International.

Corresponding author
Christopher Baethge, MD
Deutsches Ärzteblatt
Medizinisch-wissenschaftliche Redaktion
Ottostr. 12, 50859 Köln, Germany
baethge@aerzteblatt.de

Cite this as: Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107(40): 693

DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0693

1.
Archambault E, Lariviere V: History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics 2009; 79: doi: 10.1007/s11192–007–2036-x.
2.
Garfield E: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 295: 90–3. MEDLINE
3.
PLoS Medicine: The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3 (6): e291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
4.
Brumback RA: Worshiping false idols: The impact factor dilemma. Journal of Child Neurology 2008; 23 (4): 365–7. MEDLINE
5.
Mocikat R: Die Diktatur der Zitatenindizes: Folgen für die Wissenskultur. GAIA 2009; 18 (2): 100–3.
6.
Pringle J: „Worshiping false idols: The impact factor dilemma“: Correcting the record. Journal of Child Neurology 2008; 23 (9): 1092–4. MEDLINE
7.
ISI web of knowledge: http://apps.isiknowledge.com (Zugriff am 11. und 27. September 2010).

 Date HTM PDF 
10 / 2014 35 26
9 / 2014 37 30
8 / 2014 49 30
7 / 2014 46 28
6 / 2014 39 30
5 / 2014 46 30
2014 423 296
2013 479 356
2012 222 378
2011 584 389
2010 266 96
Total 1.974 1.515

Authors

Letters to the Editor

All Letters