«1234567»Seite
7 articles with references, page 3 of 7

Original article

Patients With Syncope in a German Emergency Department: Description of Patients and Processes

Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(4): 58-65; DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0058

Güldner, S; Langada, V; Popp, S; Heppner, H J; Mang, H; Christ, M

1. Kapoor WN: Syncope. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1856–62. CrossRef MEDLINE
2. Moya A: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): Developed in collaboration with, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).
1. European Heart Journal 2009: 30: 2631–71. MEDLINE
3. Grossman SA, Babineau M, Burke L, et al.: Do outcomes of near syncope parallel syncope? Am J Emerg Med 2010; (epub ahead of print). CrossRef
4.Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al.: Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 878–85.CrossRef MEDLINE
5. Getchell WS, Larsen GC, Morris CD, Mcanulty JH: Epidemiology of Syncope in hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 677–87. CrossRef MEDLINE
6. Vetta F, Ronzoni S, Costarella M, et al.: Recurrent syncope in elderly patients and tilt test table outcome: the role of comorbidities. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 49(Suppl 1): 231–6. CrossRef MEDLINE
7. Mendu Ml, Mcavay G, Lampert R, Stoehr J, Tinetti ME: Yield of diagnostic tests in evaluating syncopal episodes in older patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009; 169: 1299–305. CrossRef MEDLINE
8.Quinn JV, Stiell IG, Mcdermott DA, Sellers Kl, Kohn MA, Wells GA: Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2004; 43: 224–32. CrossRef MEDLINE
9.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales Kl, Mackenzie C: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1987; 40: 373–83. CrossRef MEDLINE
10.Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M: Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. European Heart Jjournal 2003; 24: 811–9. CrossRef
11.Reed MJ, Newby DE, Coull AJ, Prescott RJ, Jacques KG, Gray AJ: The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2010; 55: 713–21. CrossRef MEDLINE
12. Huff JS, Decker WW, Quinn JV, et al.: Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Annals of Emergency
Medicine 2007; 49: 431–44. CrossRef MEDLINE
13.Baron-Esquivias G, Martínez-Alday J, Martín A, et al.: Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic approach in patients admitted to the emergency room for transient loss of consciousness: Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR) study. Europace 2010; 12: 869–76. CrossRef MEDLINE
14.McCarthy F, McMahon CG, Geary U, Plunkett PK, Kenny RA, Cunningham CJ: Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a single hospital observational case series based on the application of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Europace 2009; 11: 216–24. CrossRef MEDLINE
15. Grossman SA, Fischer C, Lipsitz LA, et al.: Predicting adverse outcomes in syncope. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2007; 33: 233–9. CrossRef MEDLINE
16.Costantino G, Perego F, Dipaola F, et al.: Short- and long-term prognosis of syncope, risk factors, and role of hospital admission: results from the STePS (Short-Term Prognosis of Syncope) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 276–83. CrossRef MEDLINE
17. Dipaola F, Costantino G, Perego F, et al.: San Francisco Syncope
Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term out-come of syncope. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2010; 28: 432–9. CrossRef MEDLINE
18.Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, Kohn M, Wells G: Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2006; 47: 448–54. CrossRef MEDLINE
19. Kapoor WN, Hanusa BH: Is syncope a risk factor for poor outcomes? Comparison of patients with and without syncope. The American Journal of Medicine 1996; 100: 646–55. CrossRef MEDLINE
20. Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Maher Y, Miller RA, Levey GS: Syncope of unknown origin. The need for a more cost-effective approach to its diagnosis evaluation. JAMA 1982; 247: 2687–91. CrossRef MEDLINE
21. Grossman SA, Fischer C, Bar Jl, et al.: The yield of head CT in syncope: a pilot study. Internal and Emergency Medicine 2007; 2: 46–9. CrossRef MEDLINE
22.Schnipper Jl, Ackerman RH, Krier JB, Honour M: Diagnostic yield and utility of neurovascular ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with syncope. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic 2005; 80: 480–8. CrossRef MEDLINE
23. Brignole M, Ungar A, Bartoletti A, et al.: Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace 2006; 8: 644–50. CrossRef MEDLINE
24. Melnick ER, Genes NG, Chawla NK, Akerman M, Baumlin KM, Jagoda A: Knowledge translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians’ clinical policy on syncope using computerized clinical decision support. Int J Emerg Med 2010; 3: 97–104. CrossRef MEDLINE
25. Goodacre S: Hospital admissions with head injury following publication of NICE guidance. Emerg Med J 2008; 25: 556–7. CrossRef MEDLINE