The article laudably provided an overview of the topic from an interdisciplinary perspective (1). One cannot but agree with the authors in objecting to the still prevalent therapeutic nihilism. At the same time it should be emphasized that management of tinnitus is the rule, rather than its actual cure. Especially in severely affected patients, the realistic therapeutic objective is a significant reduction in the stress caused by tinnitus.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the only genuinely evidence based therapy, but this goes almost unnoticed in the article owing to the very short explanation and cautious wording (“the best-evaluated treatment for tinnitus”).
In order to assess the indication for treatment (and therapeutic success) it is vital to determine the extent of the stress caused by tinnitus. Relevant validated questionnaires are not only available, as was mentioned almost as an aside, but they should be an integral component of the diagnostic evaluation. The first one to mention in this context is the tinnitus questionnaire ( or the mini-tinnitus questionnaire-12 ).
Psychologically oriented tinnitus therapy, which ranges from one-off counseling to multimodal tinnitus management therapy including CBT, should be used in a differentiated manner, depending on the stress caused by the tinnitus and the psychological comorbidity (4). Psychological comorbidity, which often also includes somatoform disorders, correlates with the severity of the tinnitus. Especially highly stressed tinnitus patients should undergo targeted screening for psychological disorders (3, 4). Psychological comorbidities are not only a consequence of tinnitus; rather, pre-existing mental disorders are often a form of adaptive processing of the tinnitus and as such constitute a crucial risk factor for its chronification and decompensation (4). Treating psychological comorbidities should not, as shown in Figure 2, precede (behavioral therapeutic) tinnitus therapy but be treated alongside the tinnitus.
Dr. med. Ulrich Stattrop
Prof. Dr. med. Gerhard Goebel
Prof. Dr. med. Ulrich Voderholzer
Schön Klinik Roseneck, Prien a. Chiemsee
Conflict of interest statement
Professor Goebel has received royalties for the tinnitus questionnaire from Hogrefe publishers. The other two authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Kreuzer PM, Vielsmeier V, Langguth B: Chronic tinnitus: an interdisciplinary challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110(16): 278–84 VOLLTEXT
Goebel G, Hiller W: Tinnitus-Fragebogen (TF). Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Belastung und Schweregrad bei Tinnitus. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie 1998.
Hiller W, Goebel G: Rapid assessment of tinnitus-related psychological distress using the Mini-TQ. International Journal of Audiology 2004; 43: 600–4 MEDLINE