The Investigation and Differential Diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome in Adults
; ; ; ; ;
Background: As a result of the increased public interest in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), certain core manifestations of ASD—impaired social interaction and communication, bizarre interests—are now commonly recognized as being typical of autism, not only in children, but in adults as well. More often than before, general practitioners, neurologists, and psychiatrists find themselves being asked whether a patient is suffering from previously unrecognized Asperger syndrome (AS). The prevalence of ASD is estimated at 1%, and the ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed cases at about 3:2. Little is known about the diagnostic evaluation of AS in adulthood.
Methods: We selectively searched the Medline database for pertinent literature, paying special attention to diagnostic manuals and to the guideline of the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Results: Centrally important aspects of the diagnosis of AS include an assessment of the patient’s ability to assume the emotional perspectives of others, non-verbal modes of expression, repetitive behavior patterns, and childhood social behavioral history. The autism quotient (AQ) is now established as a simple but nonspecific screening test. Up to 70% of all affected adults have comorbid disturbances, most often depression and anxiety disorders. The differential diagnosis includes personality disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder. The diagnostic assessment should proceed in stepwise fashion, starting from simple screening in primary care and then moving on to evaluation of the suspected diagnosis by a mental health care specialist, followed by extensive further investigation in an outpatient clinic specifically devoted to patients with autism spectrum disorders.
Conclusion: The diagnostic assessment of autism in adults requires knowledge of the core and accompanying manifestations of autism and of their differential diagnoses. More research is needed for the development of further screening tests and the precise determination of diagnosis rates, differential diagnoses, and comorbidities.
Scientific and public interest in the autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has risen greatly over the last 20 years. According to the most recent epidemiological studies, the prevalence of ASD has climbed to about 1% and is thus comparable to that of schizophrenia (1). One reason for the increasing prevalence is thought to be the inclusion of “milder” disturbances within the autism spectrum, above all Asperger syndrome (AS) and high-functioning autism (HFA).
The findings of a recent population-based study imply that, for every three cases of ASD that are diagnosed in children of primary-school age, two more cases remain unrecognized (2). Other studies have shown that many affected persons probably reach adulthood without having had an age-specific condition diagnosed in childhood or adolescence (3, 4). Because of the increased interest in ASD, these persons’ persistent problems of social adaptation, eccentric behavioral traits, and “strange” interests are increasingly perceived as “autistic” by the affected individuals themselves, their families, and their treating physicians and therapists. Thus, psychiatrists, neurologists, and general practitioners in primary care are now being asked more often than before to determine whether a patient is suffering from a hitherto unrecognized ASD. These physicians need to know the relevant differential-diagnostic considerations and how the diagnostic assessment ought to proceed. It should be borne in mind that every second person receiving a late diagnosis of ASD suffers from a comorbid anxiety disorder or depression, and that half of all persons with ASD are unemployed and have a low socioeconomic status despite high educational attainments (5, 6). Psychotherapeutic and social-psychiatric interventions can only provide effective help in such cases if the patient’s autistic background is recognized (4).
In comparison to the longstanding clinical expertise in the treatment of children and adolescents with ASD (7), relatively little is known about these disorders in adult medicine. The special outpatient clinics for ASD in adulthood that were only recently introduced are still too few in number to keep up with the increasing demand for diagnostic evaluation (8, 9). This evaluation must be rational and (cost-) efficient in order to lessen the waiting time till a secure diagnosis can be made (which is now generally several months long) and to enable timely initiation of the appropriate behavioral and social-therapeutic measures (10).
Our goals in writing this article are to:
- inform physicians about the psychopathological features of the core and accompanying manifestations of autism and their differential diagnoses,
- point out the special features of persons who receive a late diagnosis of ASD, and
- describe the process of outpatient diagnostic evaluation.
We selectively searched the PubMed database for relevant original articles and reviews, using the following search terms: “Asperger” OR “high-functioning autism” AND “adult*” AND “diagnosis [Title/Abstract]” (133 hits); “autism spectrum disorder” AND “adult*” AND “differential diagnosis” [Title/Abstract] (37 hits). Further sources for this article are the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV TR) (11), the ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10) (12), the pertinent guideline published in June 2012 by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence of the United Kingdom (NICE, guidance.nice.org.uk/cg142) (4), and the authors’ personal experience in a special outpatient clinic for ASD in adulthood.
Core and accompanying manifestations of autism
The diagnostic criteria for AS in adulthood (ICD-10: F84.5, DSM-IV 299.80), as operationalized in the Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA) scheme (13), are summarized in Box 1. The three areas of core manifestations of autism are described in detail below.
Disturbance of social interaction
The main feature is a lack of intuitive understanding of the rules of interpersonal relations. From early childhood on, the affected person stands out as socially isolated with little interest in initiating or maintaining friendships, particularly with age peers. The existing types of social contact may be eccentric or highly self-centered. Family members often perceive the affected person as cool and selfish, but also as highly reliable, honest, and free of cultural or sexist prejudice (14). There are marked difficulties in the appropriate assessment of the context of social situations (“weak central coherence”) and in the assumption of other people’s emotional perspectives—i.e., empathy, which is the ability to recognize other people’s feelings, intentions, and attitudes, to create an image of them in one’s own thoughts and emotions, and to feel them vicariously. Another way to characterize this is as an impaired ability to “mentalize,” or, as it has also been called, an impaired “theory of mind” (15, 16).
There is a marked impairment in the perception, interpretation, and implementation of mutually modulated, context-driven nonverbal communication, e.g., facial expressions, prosody, body posture, and gesticulation. Eye contact may be noticeably elusive, or, alternatively, fixed, without being used for communicative purposes. Despite possessing highly developed language skills in terms of grammar and vocabulary, the affected person lacks understanding of social-pragmatic content (e.g., implicit requests, set phrases) and semantic content (e.g., irony, metaphor), so that communication tends to be highly formalistic.
Limited interests and repetitive behavior patterns
The affected person’s interests and activities are characterized by intense involvement in highly circumscribed areas (e.g., the collection and cataloguing of specific types of information), interest in rule systems and structures (e.g., language syntax or tables), and a lack of social context. Limited cognitive flexibility can manifest itself in unusual devotion to orderliness and in the introduction of rituals into everyday life that must be rigidly adhered to; when these rituals are interrupted, anxiety arises.
The common accompanying psychopathological manifestations of ASD include sensory and motor abnormalities, regulatory disturbances of attention and emotion, transient psychotic manifestations, and abnormal eating behavior (Table 1). In some cases, these accompanying manifestations actually dominate the clinical picture, compounding the difficulties in differential diagnosis that are described below.
Differentiation within the autism spectrum
Asperger syndrome (AS) differs from early-childhood autism (ICD-10 F84.0, DSM-IV 299.0) by a lack of cognitive developmental delay in the first years of life. In HFA, language development is delayed, but intelligence is normal (IQ >70) (11, 12). By the time the affected persons reach adulthood, reliable information about putative developmental delays in early childhood can generally no longer be obtained. As there is thus no reliable way to distinguish AS and HFA in adulthood by either clinical or neuropsychological criteria, the two designations are commonly used interchangeably (17). It is worth noting that the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM-5) puts early childhood autism, HFA, and AS together under the designation ASD, differentiating among them only with respect to the severity of manifestations in the individual case. Moreover, the DSM-5 introduces sensory hyper- or hyporeactivity as a new diagnostic criterion for ASD (www.dsm5.org) (18).
Particularities of patients with a late diagnosis of Asperger syndrome
In the author’s specialized outpatient clinic for ASD in adulthood, 90% of the patients referred with a late diagnosis of ASD meet the clinical criteria for AS (19). A possible reason for the delay in the diagnosis of AS, aside from the relatively “mild” manifestations of autism in this disorder, may be found in the affected persons’ highly effective social and cognitive compensation. They are usually of high-average or above-average intelligence and can often cover up their deficits of social communication and interaction to some extent by means of cognitive learning processes, with the development and formulaic “overlearning” of explicit situational rules (“model learning”) (20, 21). Affected persons with high verbal competence and introspective ability may achieve a comparatively high level of psychosocial functioning that often appears unremarkable, at least on the surface. Studies have shown that 50% to 80% of persons with AS live independently, up to 80% have completed higher education, and half report intimate interpersonal relationships (6, 19, 22). Such high functioning requires an ever-greater adaptation of autistic cognitive and behavioral structures to an increasingly complex social environment (23). Typically, non-intuitive compensatory strategies succeed up to a point and then finally fail, because of their excessive rigidity, in threshold-crossing situations such as moving out of the parental household, starting occupational training, taking a first job, changing one’s occupation, or trying to start an intimate relationship. In consequence, up to 70% of the affected persons develop comorbid disturbances, mainly anxiety disorders and depression (5, 6, 19). If they then seek medical help, the manifestations of these secondary disturbances may camouflage autistic experiences and behavior, leading to difficulties in both differential diagnosis and treatment (24, 25).
Only a few specific screening instruments have been developed to date for the initial diagnostic assessment of AS in adulthood. The best-known of these are two self-assessment instruments, the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) (26) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ); both are accessible on the Internet (http://autismresearchcenter.com/arc_tests) (27). The AQ-10, a time-saving abbreviated version of the AQ, is recommended in the NICE guidelines (4); it consists of the 10 most informative items of the AQ and indicates autistic features if more than 6 of these are answered positively (28). Non-self-assessment instruments such as the Marburg Rating Scale for Asperger’s Syndrome (MBAS) (29) and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) (30) can be used to assess the evidence for autistic behavior either at present or in childhood. If a screening instrument yields findings in the normal range, this is generally a reliable indication that the individual does not have an ASD (31, 32). On the other hand, our experience in a special outpatient clinic for ASD in adulthood has shown that values well above threshold do not by any means assure us that the individual has AS, as opposed to one of its common differential diagnoses, or perhaps merely an introverted or socially inhibited personality of no psychopathological significance. More research is clearly needed for the creation of better diagnostic instruments (including self-assessment instruments) for patients who are referred with a suspected diagnosis of autism (10).
Confirming a suspected diagnosis
The diagnosis of AS in adulthood requires time, resources, and clinical experience (4). In the United Kingdom, the National Assessment Service for Adults with Autism, confronted with a fivefold increase in referrals over the period 2005–2010, established a diagnostic process in three steps (10), which is shown in modified form in the Figure:
a) The primary-care physician becomes aware of clinical red flags and their psychosocial effects (Table 2), obtains a positive screening test (e.g., the AQ-10), and then refers the patient to a mental health care specialist with the suspected diagnosis of autism.
b) The specialist assesses the presence and intensity of the core manifestations of autism. The patient’s impaired abilities to assume the emotional perspectives of others, to empathize, and to understand complex social situations should be clearly evident from descriptions of the patient’s everyday behavior, both in private life and at work. In making this assessment, the specialist’s purpose is better served by a “tangential” discussion of the patient’s current living situation and social context, rather than by direct questioning about autistic modes of experience. Furthermore, the patient’s intuitive use of communicative modalities plays a major role here (e.g., set phrases, facial expressions, eye contact).
Typical specialized interests and ritualized behavior patterns should remain constantly in evidence over the patient’s life span. The specialist should obtain information from other persons about the patient’s social interactions in childhood, such as in group games and imitation games, in order to determine whether the characteristic impairments of social interaction were already present in childhood and then persisted, or else developed secondarily later on. Teachers’ assessments of the patient’s social behavior, as noted in primary-school report cards, can be helpful in this respect. In history-taking, special attention should be paid to evidence of severe emotional neglect or physical or sexual abuse in childhood, which can cause quasi-autistic impairments of emotional experience and behavior patterns (33).
c) If an ASD is still suspected on the basis of the assessment up to this point, the patient should be referred to a specialized outpatient clinic for ASD in adulthood for a comprehensive diagnostic and differential-diagnostic evaluation, including the identification of possible psychiatric comorbidities (Table 3). Useful additional testing may include neuropsychological instruments for assessing the patient’s general cognitive performance profile and circumscribed social-cognitive deficits. The testing of attention and executive functions can also yield valuable clues to areas of poor performance in which special help is needed (21, 34). Whenever a definitive diagnosis of ASD is made, the patient should be given comprehensive psychosocial counseling and offered the appropriate treatment (35–37) (Figure) (4).
Psychiatric comorbidity or differential diagnosis?
The commonest differential diagnoses of AS (Box 2) are personality disorders (PD), social anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (25, 38– 40). PD are maladaptive behavior patterns that persist over time and manifest themselves regardless of the social context; they are characterized by rigid reactions to varying personal and social situations, and they lead to a corresponding impairment (11). A study in which patients with AS were assessed with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (the SCID-II) revealed that 19–32% of them met formal criteria for compulsive PD, 21–26% for schizoid PD, 13–25% for avoidant PD, and 3–13% for schizotypal PD (6, e1). Personality disorders differ from AS in that the abnormal behavior pattern of a PD generally appears in puberty or later, after initially well-adjusted social behavior in childhood.
The psychiatric comorbidities that were revealed by an observational study to be the most common ones among patients with late-diagnosed AS (Box 2) are depressive disorders in 53%, anxiety disorders in 50%, ADHD in 43%, and obsessive-compulsive disorders in 24% (6, 24). It is noteworthy, that the latter three are also of differential diagnostic relevance. Only a few studies to date have addressed the question of how late-diagnosed AS can be distinguished from its psychiatric comorbidities and differential diagnoses; far more studies have been devoted to this question for AS diagnosed at a typical age (24, 25). Table 4 illustrates the phenomenological overlap of late-diagnosed AS with the other conditions that will be described in the following sections.
Schizophrenia-like personality disorders
Paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal personality disorders, which are grouped together in Cluster A of the DSM-IV, have also been collectively termed “schizophrenia-like” personality disorders (e2). In the study of Barneveld et al. (2011), 40% of a group of patients with ASD met formal criteria for a schizotypal PD (39). Other studies have confirmed that autistic behavior traits overlap with schizotypal and schizoid ones (e3, e4). One of the distinguishing features of schizoid PD is a marked narrowing of affect with an impaired capacity for emotional experience and expression. In contrast, schizotypal PD is typified by seemingly eccentric social-contact behavior, with apparently paranoid perceptual distortion and bizarre convictions (“magical thinking”). By definition, persons with schizophrenia-like personality disorders do not meet the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia: in particular, they have neither of the two key positive manifestations (delusions and auditory hallucinations). Persons with AS are “hypo-mentalizers,” i.e., they fail to recognize social cues such as verbal hints, body language, and gesticulation, but persons with schizophrenia-like PD tend to be “hyper-mentalizers,” overinterpreting such cues in a generally suspicious way (39). Although they may have been socially isolated from childhood onward, most people with schizophrenia-like PD displayed well-adapted social behavior as children, along with apparently normal emotional function.
Social anxiety disorders
The category of social anxiety disorders contains social phobia and avoidant personality disorder (e5). The main feature of social anxiety disorders is an intense fear of situations where the affected person occupies the center of attention, which leads to the development of strategies for keeping out of such situations. In the extreme case, there may be total withdrawal from social contact. The root cause is a deep-seated fear of criticism and negative judgment by others. Persons with these disorders often have longstanding social behavioral inhibitions, e.g., avoidance of eye contact and reduced communicative expression from childhood onward (11). Such persons’ inadequate emotional perception is characterized by the selective perception of social cues connoting a negative assessment, e.g., rejection or disdain (e6). When they face less social stress, e.g., within the family, they can usually succeed at recognizing the emotions of others.
Obsessive-compulsive disorders can massively impair social functioning and lead to social isolation if the performance of compulsive behaviors becomes the single biggest part of the patient’s life. Empathic and social-cognitive skills are generally not affected. Persons with AS may seem to be obsessive-compulsive because of the behavioral rituals, organizing systems, or collecting habits that they pursue intensely, feeling uneasy or frightened whenever such actions are not carried out (25, e7). Persons with AS, unlike those with obsessive-compulsive disorders, usually perceive the repetitive actions as reasonable and appropriate; moreover, the actions themselves lack the “neutralizing” character of true compulsions, e.g., hand-washing because of fear of contamination (e8).
Compulsive (anankastic) personality disorder
The manifestations of compulsive personality disorder consist of an intense preoccupation with order, lists, and formalities and an emphasis on peripheral details at the expense of flexibility and openness. As a result, the sufferers’ social competence may be massively impaired. Their social contact behavior is characterized by formalism, distance, and strict adherence to rigid notions of morality and values (e1, e9). Excessively high performance standards, perfectionism, a disproportionate inclination to self-criticism, and agonizing indecisiveness when the customary rules and values do not apply are all features of compulsive personality disorder that typically are not seen in persons with Asperger syndrome.
Attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder
The situationally independent triad of manifestations of attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) consists of lack of attention, lack of impulse control, and increased motor activity, with resulting impairment of social-cognitive performance. Recent studies have revealed a prevalence of 3% to 7% among the children and adolescents studied. The manifestations are thought to persist into adulthood in half of all cases (e10). Genetic and neuropsychological findings suggest that ASD and ADHD are etiologically and pathogenetically related, though it is not yet clear whether there is a “genuine” comorbidity or, rather, a specific ASD phenotype with ADHD-like manifestations (e11). The problems of attention in Asperger syndrome include increased distractability by external stimuli and intolerance to stress. Impulsive behavior may arise if the rigid behavior patterns and rituals are interrupted. Impaired motor coordination, bizarre body language, and fleeting eye contact can also be features of either condition. Phenomenologically, AS is distinguishable from ADHD, with AS being characterized by (38):
- more severe impairment in social and emotional communication,
- characteristically restrictive behavior patterns and special interests,
- a detail-oriented perceptual style,
- lack of volatility of thought and behavior,
- more severe impairment of communicative modes of expression, and
- a rarer tendency toward disorganization.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Lehnhardt and Dipl.-Psych. Gawronski have had meeting participation fees reimbursed by the Volkswagen Foundation.
Dr. Schilbach received financial support from the Volkswagen Foundation for an interdisciplinary research project on social cognition.
Prof. Vogeley has received payment for medicolegal work involving autism.
He has received reimbursement of meeting participation fees as well as financial research support from the Volkswagen Foundation.
Dipl.-Psych. Pfeiffer and Dr. Kockler state that they have no conflict of interest.
Manuscript submitted on 2 November 2012, revised version accepted on 25 June 2013.
Translated from the original German by Ethan Taub, M.D.
Dr. med. Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Kerpener Str. 62
50937 Cologne, Germany
@For eReferences please refer to:
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. phil. Vogeley
|1.||Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2008 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2012; 61: 1–19.|
|2.||Baron-Cohen S, Scott FJ, Allison C, et al.: Prevalence of |
autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study.
Br J Psychiatry 2009; 194: 500–9. CrossRef MEDLINE
|3.||Brugha TS, McManus S, Bankart J, et al.: Epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders in adults in the community in England. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 459–65. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|4.||Pilling S, Baron-Cohen S, Megnin-Viggars O, Lee R, Taylor C; Guideline Development Group: Recognition, referral, diagnosis, and management of adults with autism: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012; 344: e4082. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|5.||Lugnegård T, Hallerbäck MU, Gillberg C: Psychiatric comorbidity in young adults with a clinical diagnosis of Asperger syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32: 1910–7. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|6.||Hofvander B, Delorme R, Chaste P, et al.: Psychiatric and psychosocial problems in adults with normal-intelligence autism spectrum disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 35. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|7.||Freitag CM: Autistic disorders – the state of the art and recent findings: epidemiology, aetiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic interventions. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2012; 40: 139–48. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|8.||Michel TM, Sheldrick AJ, Frentzel TG, et al.: Evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic services in German university hospitals for adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2010; 78: 402–13. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|9.||Roy M, Dillo W, Emrich HM, Ohlmeier MD: Asperger’s syndrome in adulthood. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(5): 59–64. VOLLTEXT|
|10.||Murphy DG, Beecham J, Craig M, Ecker C: Autism in adults. New biologicial findings and their translational implications to the cost of clinical services. Brain Res 2011; 1380: 22–33. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|11.||Saß H, Wittchen H, Zaudig M: Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen – Textrevision – DSM-IV-TR. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe-Verlag 2003.|
|12.||Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt M: Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen, Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber 2004.|
|13.||Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Robinson J, Woodbury-Smith M. The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): a diagnostic method. |
J Autism Dev Disord 2005; 35: 807–19. CrossRef MEDLINE
|14.||Dose M: Das Asperger-Syndrom. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2010; 78: 233–44. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|15.||Happé F, Frith U: The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2006; 36: 5–25. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|16.||Spek AA, Scholte EM, van Berckelaer-Onnes IA: Theory of mind in adults with HFA and Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 2010; 40: 280–9. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|17.||Howlin P, Goode S, Hutton J, Rutter M: Adult outcome for children with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004; 45: 212–29. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|18.||Wing L, Gould J, Gillberg C: Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: better or worse than the DSM-IV? Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32: 768–73. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|19.||Lehnhardt FG, Gawronski A, Volpert K, Schilbach L, Tepest R, Vogeley K: Psychosocial functioning of adults with late diagnosed autism spectrum disorders–a retrospective study. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2012; 80: 88–97. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|20.||Spek AA, Scholte EM, van Berckelaer-Onnes IA: Brief report: The use of WAIS-III in adults with HFA and Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 2008; 38: 782–7. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|21.||Lehnhardt FG, Gawronski A, Volpert K, et al.: Autism spectrum disorders in adulthood: clinical and neuropsychological findings of Aspergers syndrome diagnosed late in life. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2011; 79: 290–7. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|22.||Marriage S, Wolverton A, Marriage K: Autism spectrum disorder grown up: a chart review of adult functioning. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009; 18: 322–8. MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|23.||Sperry LA, Mesibov GB: Perceptions of social challenges of adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 2005; 9: 362–76. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|24.||Stewart ME, Barnard L, Pearson J, Hasan R, O'Brien G: Presentation of depression in autism and Asperger syndrome: a review. Autism 2006; 10: 103–16. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|25.||Cath DC, Ran N, Smit JH, van Balkom AJ, Comijs HC: Symptom overlap between autism spectrum disorder, generalized social anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a preliminary case-controlled study. Psychopathology 2008; 41: 101–10. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|26.||Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E: The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord 2001; 31: 5–17. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|27.||Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S: The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord 2004; 34: 163–75. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|28.||Allison C, Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S: Toward brief “red flags” for autism screening: the short autism spectrum quotient and the short quantitative checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012; 51: 202–12.e7. MEDLINE|
|29.||Kamp-Becker I, Mattejat F, Wolf-Ostermann K, Remschmidt H: The Marburg Rating Scale for Asperger’s Syndrome (MBAS)—a screening instrument for high-functioning autistic disorders. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2005; 33: 15–26. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|30.||Bölte S, Poustka F: Psychodiagnostic instruments for the assessment of autism spectrum disorders. Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2005; 20: 68–9.|
|31.||Woodbury-Smith MR, Robinson J, Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S: Screening adults for Asperger Syndrome using the AQ: a preliminary study of its diagnostic validity in clinical practice. J Autism Dev Disord 2005; 35: 331–5. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|32.||Stoesz BM, Montgomery JM, Smart S, Hellsten L-AM: Review of five instruments for the assessment of Asperger’s Disorder in adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2011; 25: 376–401. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|33.||Johnson JG, et al.: Childhood verbal abuse and risk for personality disorders during adolescence and early adulthood. Compr Psychiatry 2001; 42: 16–23. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|34.||Ambery FZ, Russell AJ, Perry K, Morris R, Murphy DG: Neuropsychological functioning in adults with Asperger syndrome. Autism 2006; 10: 551–64. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|35.||Fangmeier T, et al.: Psychotherapie des Asperger-Syndroms im Erwachsenenalter [Psychotherapy of Asperger syndrome in adults]. Der Nervenarzt 2011; 82: 628–35. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|36.||Gawronski A, Pfeiffer K, Vogeley K: Hochfunktionaler Autismus im Erwachsenenalter: Verhaltenstherapeutisches Gruppenmanual. Weinheim: Verlagsgruppe Beltz 2012; 288.|
|37.||Ebert D, et al.: Asperger-Autismus und hochfunktionaler Autismus bei Erwachsenen – Das Therapiemanual der Freiburger Autismus-Studiengruppe. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag 2012; 146.|
|38.||Remschmidt H, Kamp-Becker I: Asperger-Syndrom. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag 2006; 259. CrossRef|
|39.||Barneveld PS, et al.: Overlap of autistic and schizotypal traits in |
adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res 2011: 126: 231–6. CrossRef MEDLINE
|40.||Tyson KE, Cruess DG: Differentiating high-functioning autism and social Phobia. J Autism Dev Disord 2011; 42: 1477–90. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e1.||Lugnegård T, Hallerbäck MU, Gillberg C: Personality disorders and autism spectrum disorders: what are the connections? Compr Psychiatry 2012; 53: 333–40. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e2.||Suslow T, Arolt V: Schizophreniale Persönlichkeitsstörungen [Schizophrenia-like personality disorders]. Der Nervenarzt 2009; 80: 343–50. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e3.||Hurst RM, Nelson-Gray RO, Mitchell JT, Kwapil TR: The relationship of Asperger’s characteristics and schizotypal personality traits in a non-clinical adult sample. J Autism Dev Disord 2007; 37: 1711–20. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e4.||Tantam D: Lifelong eccentricity and social isolation. II: Asperger’s syndrome or schizoid personality disorder? Br J Psychiatry 1988; 153: 783–91. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e5.||Reich J: Avoidant personality disorder and its relationship to social phobia. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2009; 11: 89–93. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e6.||Tyson KE, Cruess DG: Differentiating high-functioning autism and social phobia. J Autism Dev Disord 2012; 42: 1477–90. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e7.||Wakabayashi A, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin C: Do the traits of autism-spectrum overlap with those of schizophrenia or obsessive-compulsive disorder in the general population? Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2012; 6: 717–25. CrossRef|
|e8.||Russell AJ, Mataix-Cols D, Anson M, Murphy DG: Obsessions and compulsions in Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 525–8. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e9.||Fitzgerald M: Misdiagnosis of Asperger syndrome as anankastic personality disorder. Autism 2002; 6: 435. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e10.||Barbaresi W, Katusic S, Colligan R, et al.: How common is attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Towards resolution of the controversy: results from a population-based study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2004; 93: 55–9. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e11.||Sinzig J, Walter D, Doepfner M: Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: symptom or syndrome? J Atten Disord 2009; 13: 117–26. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e12.||Crane L, Goddard L, Pring L: Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 2009; 13: 215–28. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e13.||Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, Cermak SA, Engel-Yeger B, Gal E: A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2009; 39: 1–11. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e14.||Godbout R, Bergeron C, Limoges E, Stip E, Mottron L: A laboratory study of sleep in Asperger’s syndrome. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 127–30. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e15.||Allik H, Larsson JO, Smedje H: Insomnia in school-age children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6: 18. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e16.||Yoshida Y, Uchiyama T: The clinical necessity for assessing Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) symptoms in children with high-functioning Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 13: 307–14. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e17.||Canitano R, Vivanti G: Tics and Tourette syndrome in autism spectrum disorders. Autism 2007; 11: 19–28. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e18.||Jeste SS:The neurology of autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 2011; 24: 132–9. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e19.||Skokauskas N, Gallagher L: Psychosis, affective disorders and anxiety in autistic spectrum disorder: prevalence and nosological considerations. Psychopathology 2010; 43: 8–16. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e20.||Zucker NL, Losh M, Bulik CM, LaBar KS, Piven J, Pelphrey KA: Anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorders: guided investigation of social cognitive endophenotypes. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 976–1006. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e21.||Anckarsäter H, Stahlberg O, Larson T, et al.: The impact of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder on temperament, character, and personality development. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 1239–44. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e22.||Newman SS, Ghaziuddin M: Violent crime in Asperger syndrome: the role of psychiatric comorbidity. J Autism Dev Disord 2008; 38: 1848–52. CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e23.||Gillberg CA: Guide to Asperger Syndrome. Cambridge: University Press 2002. CrossRef|
|e24.||Klin A, Volkmar FR: Asperger syndrome: diagnosis and external validity. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2003; 12: 1–13. CrossRef MEDLINE|