DÄ internationalArchive23/2015Open Biportal Decompression of the Median Nerve
LNSLNS

The authors published an excellent review article on the evidence-based diagnostic procedures and therapeutic recommendations for the two most common peripheral nerve compression syndromes: carpal tunnel syndrome and cubital tunnel syndrome (1). The team of authors, which is also involved in setting out the S3 guideline for the diagnostic evaluation and therapy of carpal tunnel syndrome, presented four approaches for decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome. We wish to add to these a fifth procedure: that of open biportal decompression of the median nerve, which was first described by Kenneth Wilson in 1989 and was compared prospectively in 1994 with the standard approach, in patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome intraindividually as a double-incision method (2). After endoscopic procedures became established, this method has taken a backseat, but in persons who do not wish to have an endoscopic intervention it represents a safe technique that is potentially superior to the classic open approach.

We perform this technique in our hospital by placing the transverse incision between the linea restricta and the distal part of the carpal tunnel, from the palmaris longus tendon in an ulnar direction. After the incision of the antebrachial fascia, adhesions between the flexor retinaculum and the median nerve are released. A second, distal-longitudinal incision is placed in the linea vitalis above and throughout the distal carpal ligament. The carpal ligament is split up to the superficial ulnar arch. The advantage compared with the open technique is the fact that no surgical scar is left in the proximal palmar surface region, in which the palmar skin is more tightly connected to the subcutaneous tissue than in other regions. Transversal nerve fibers pass through here that are severed when using the monoportal open standard technique, so that scar pain may occur in the palmar surface region. Compared with endoscopic procedures, the reduced technical complexity is an advantage. It goes without saying that the basis of safe open biportal decompression is an appropriate learning curve.

DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0404a

PD Dr. med. Christoph Hirche

Dr. med. Berthold Bickert

Prof. Dr. med. Ulrich Kneser
Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie,
Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen

Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie an der Universität Heidelberg
christoph.hirche@bgu-ludwigshafen.de

1.
Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C: Carpal and cubital tunnel and other, rarer nerve compression syndromes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 14–26 VOLLTEXT
2.
Wilson KM: Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 907–12 94)90088-4">CrossRef
1.Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C: Carpal and cubital tunnel and other, rarer nerve compression syndromes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 14–26 VOLLTEXT
2.Wilson KM: Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 907–12 CrossRef

Info

Specialities