Health and Disease at Age 100: Findings From the Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study
Background: Centenarian studies from around the world have shown that reaching age 100 typically involves substantial health issues. The present study adds to the existing knowledge from other countries by describing health conditions in German centenarians.
Methods: A total of 112 centenarians or their primary contacts provided information on acute and chronic health conditions and pain in the context of the Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study (mean age = 100.45 years, standard deviation [SD] = 0.47, 89% females).
Results: Participants showed high comorbidity, with an average of five illnesses (mean = 5.3; SD = 2.20). Health conditions with highest prevalence were sensory (vision, hearing; 94%), mobility (72%) and musculoskeletal conditions (60%). Cardiovascular conditions (57%) and urinary system ailments (55%) were also common. Pain was experienced often by 30% of the participants. Of those reporting any pain, 36% indicated pain exceeding bearable levels.
Conclusion: German centenarians experienced a substantial number of illnesses, dominated by sensory and mobility conditions. Cardiovascular diseases were the only potentially lethal illnesses with high prevalence. Evidence of unaddressed pain seems alarming, requiring future research. Emerging health profiles indicate that even in very advanced age, quality of life may be improved by enhanced diagnostics and optimal disease management. Mobility limitations may be addressed with preventive efforts.
Very old individuals (i.e., 80 years and older) represent the fastest growing population in most industrialized nations (1). This includes centenarians, the oldest old within this group. According to the German CENSUS, the number of German centenarians has grown from 5937 to 13 445 between the years 2000 and 2011, which represents an increase of 126%. Future projections expect this trend to further accelerate (2). This development raises concerns about increasing numbers of individuals who may experience their advanced age in poor health and related medical needs and costs burdening the health care system (3). A solid evidence base regarding health conditions in very late life is thus pertinent. The present paper aims to identify common diseases among centenarians in Germany.
Centenarians have long been discussed as models of successful aging, given that they have outlived most of their cohort members. Yet, studies from around the world document that age 100 is often characterized by high morbidity and poor functional health (4–7) (Table 1). For instance, about 97% of centenarians of the Tokyo Centenarian Study had chronic diseases (8). The population-based Danish Centenarian Study identified only one of 207 centenarians without health issues; four acute or chronic conditions were the average (9). However, some studies reported fewer comorbidities: A Greek centenarian study found only one health condition on average (10). In the New England Centenarian Study (NECS), 32% of male and 15% of female participants reached age 100 without any of the ten most common diseases, which include hypertension, heart disease, stroke and cancer (11). Reasons for inconsistent findings are unclear, but may relate to different methodological approaches including sampling procedures (e.g., population-based vs self-nomination) and type of information considered (e.g., medical records vs self-report).
Reports about specific diseases also vary across studies. A common finding is the high prevalence of cardiovascular conditions (for a review see ). For example, cardiovascular diseases were among the illnesses with highest prevalence (72%) in Danish centenarians (9). Specifically, chronic heart failure was diagnosed in 32% of Danes, which was similar to the prevalence found in Canadian centenarians (35%) (3). In NECS, heart disease was the most frequent illness (men: 42%; women: 40%) (11). Hypertension was among the most prevalent conditions in Danish (52%) (9), Greek (51%) (10), and Japanese centenarians (63%) (8), but less often reported in NECS (19% in men, 35% in women) (11).
Sensory impairments also affect many centenarians, although prevalence rates differ as well: In NECS, cataract was among the diseases with the highest life-time prevalence (82%), whereas the prevalence of cataract was only half as high in Tokyo centenarians (46%) (8). Greek centenarians frequently reported impaired vision (74%) and impaired hearing (72%) (10). In the Fordham Centenarian Study, 38% of the 95- to 107-year old New York participants had dual sensory impairment, 18% had only hearing impairment and 17% had vision impairment only (13).
Other highly prevalent diagnoses, for example reported in the Danish Centenarian Study, included urinary incontinence (60%), osteoarthritis (54%), dementia (51%) and prostate hypertrophy (33% of male centenarians) (9).
For Germany, only limited information about health issues in centenarians is available. While the first Heidelberg Centenarian Study (14) restricted assessments to basic functional health, cognitive functioning and care needs (e.g. [15, 16]), the Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study (17) collected more detailed health information. The present paper reports on the prevalence of acute and chronic conditions of German centenarians.
Participants were 112 centenarians (mean age = 100.45 years, standard deviation [SD] = 0.47) from the population-based Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study (HD100-II) (17). Most were exactly 100 years old, 5% were 99, and 10% were 101 to 103. For recruitment, we requested contact information from the city registries of all individuals born in 1911/12, living in or within 60 km of Heidelberg, Germany. All 485 nominated individuals were invited for study participation. No exclusion criteria were applied. Of these, 298 centenarians either died between nomination and first contact, refused participation, or no contact could be established. Of the remaining 187 individuals, 7 centenarians and 73 primary contacts provided only basic information, via telephone. Reasons for refusing full study participation were cognitive restrictions/dementia (43%), concern the interview would be too exhausting (28%), no interest (16%), poor physical health (9%) and other reasons (4%). One-hundred seven centenarians or their primary contact agreed to participate in a face-to-face interview. Five additional centenarians nominated themselves after having heard of the study. Thus, full participants were 112 centenarians who were interviewed at their residence (private home or elder care facility). Of these, 94 centenarians delivered self-report information. In addition, primary contacts provided information, complementing the centenarian’s report (n = 78). However, when the centenarian was no longer able to answer reliably (e.g., due to cognitive impairment), the primary contact served as the only information source (n = 18). Comparisons between full study participants and those providing only basic information indicated that our final sample was more educated, had fewer children, and better daily and cognitive functioning (Table 2).
Acute and chronic health conditions—Centenarians and primary contacts were asked whether the centenarian had the following acute and chronic health conditions: hypertension, heart condition, diabetes, chronic lung disease, ulcers or other serious stomach issues, cirrhosis or other liver problems, kidney disease, frequent urinary infections, incontinence, prostate-related problems, problems with vision or hearing, arthritis, osteoporosis, other diseases (subsequently coded), and stroke, falls, pneumonia, and cancer (from age 95 on). Dementia/cognitive impairment was determined using thresholds of two dementia screeners and defined by either a score of 4 or higher (i.e., severe cognitive decline) given by the interviewer on the Global Deterioration Scale (18), or a score of 10 or lower on the shortened Mini-Mental State Examination (short MMSE, max. 21 points) (19), which includes original MMSE items that are unlikely to be biased by the poor sensory functioning highly prevalent in centenarians (20).
Pain—Centenarians were asked how often they experienced pain (0 = never, 1 = seldom, 2 = sometimes [once or twice per month; during specific movements], 3 = frequently [often; always at night, in the morning], 4 = always [most of the time, all day, every movement hurts]). Pain severity was assessed with a scale from 0 to 10 (key anchor points were 0 = no pain, 3 = bearable, 7 = severe, 10 = unbearable).
Statistical analysis—Information on health conditions provided by the centenarians and their primary contacts were combined, as their reports did not differ substantially (i.e., all illnesses reported were used). In case of discrepancy regarding serious issues (e.g., cancer), primary contacts were asked to clarify. Pain was assessed using self-reported data from centenarians only. Data analysis was performed with SPSS. Associations were analyzed using Pearson correlations and χ2-tests.
Acute and chronic health conditions
Sensory problems were most prevalent: 94% reported vision and/or hearing impairments (Table 3). About 72% had problems with mobility, including falls (71%) and difficulties with balance/walking (13%). Musculoskeletal conditions affected about 60%, with over half of the participants having arthritis and about one fourth having osteoporosis. Cardiovascular conditions and problems with the urinary system showed similar prevalence, affecting over half of the sample (57%, and 55%, respectively). The leading cardiovascular condition was high blood pressure (45%), followed by heart diseases (31%). For conditions affecting the urinary system, incontinence was reported by almost half of the centenarians; 66% of the male centenarians had prostate problems. Evidence of a neurological/brain condition was found in 40%: 33% had markedly reduced cognitive capacity/dementia and 12% reported having had a stroke after age 95.
Other conditions that were mentioned by 12 to 15% of the sample were: conditions related to the respiratory system (15%; pneumonia most prevalent: 12%); gastrointestinal conditions (14%; bowel conditions most prevalent: 12%); endocrinological conditions (13%; diabetes mellitus most prevalent: 11%).
Centenarians had, on average, five acute and/or chronic health conditions (mean = 5.3; SD = 2.20; median = 5.00; 25% = 4.00; 75% = 7.00; Figure). No centenarian was without health issues:
- four (4%) had only one,
- thirteen (12%) had two, and
- nine (8%) had three health conditions.
Four and five health conditions were found for 23 (21%) and 19 (17%) participants, respectively. Four centenarians had 10 conditions, and one had the maximum of 11 conditions.
Considering diseases with highest mortality risk, i.e. heart disease, stroke and non-skin cancer (prior or ongoing), it is notable that 67 (60%) centenarians did not report any of these conditions. Thirty-four (30%) had only one, and 11 (10%) had two of these diseases. No centenarian had all three of these conditions.
Pain frequency and severity
Questions about pain were answered by 80 centenarians. Of these, 17 (21%) said never, 20 (25%) said seldom and 19 (24%) said sometimes. About 30% reported experiencing pain often (n = 15; 19%) or always (n = 9; 11%). Of those reporting pain, the largest group said their pain was “bearable” (57%); four (7%) indicated weak pain. Yet, 17% (n = 10) indicated pain severity greater than bearable, 14% (n = 8) reported “severe” pain, and 5% (n = 3) chose the highest possible rating (unbearable pain). Thus, 36% of the centenarians reported levels of pain exceeding “bearable.”
There was no relation between number of health conditions and pain frequency or severity. Contrasting centenarians who experienced pain more often than “sometimes” with those who did not, those with more frequent pain were more likely to have a musculoskeletal condition (Table 4), specifically arthritis (χ2 = 4.90, p<0.05). They were also more likely to report a pain condition (e.g., chronic back pain), and somewhat less likely to report a neurological/brain condition. Contrasting centenarians who reported pain severity greater than bearable with those who did not, those with more severe pain were more likely to have a pain condition and somewhat more likely to have a musculoskeletal condition. Those with more severe pain were less likely to report a neurological/brain condition or mobility issues.
This study reported acute and chronic health conditions in the population-based Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study. Overall health of the German centenarians was, on average, characterized by five acute and/or chronic diseases, indicating a substantial burden, and representing one more condition than found in Danish centenarians (9). This could be due to sensory and mobility conditions not being included in the Danish count. Sensory issues were the most prevalent: Almost all German centenarians had problems with vision and hearing, paralleling prior studies (8, 10, 11).
Mobility problems represented the second most commonly reported health condition. Of particular concern were falls as over 70% of the centenarians reported at least one fall since age 95. This is consistent with reports that unstable gait and walking becomes a challenge for many of the oldest-old (21), and it is important to note that, as to our knowledge, prior reports on health in centenarians have not addressed this issue. Of further note is the high prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions, the condition group with the third highest prevalence affecting two thirds of the centenarians. About half of the centenarians had arthritis, representing the same proportion found in Danish centenarians (9).
Consistent with prior studies, low rates of diseases with potentially lethal outcome (e.g., stroke or non-skin cancer) were found, except for cardiovascular conditions. Although centenarians are affected by these conditions later in life and survive them longer, cardiovascular and circulatory diseases are nevertheless associated with high disease burden and cause the largest loss of disability-adjusted life years (22). About two thirds of the sample were affected, and the prevalence of heart diseases and hypertension were similar to prior studies (3, 9, 10). Urinary conditions were also reported by about half of the sample, as in prior work (9).
Although the prevalence of stroke (from age 95 on) was comparable to other centenarian studies (9, 11), an interesting difference is the lower prevalence of dementia (33%) in our sample. Dementia was not included in the diseases listed in our questionnaire, and only a handful participants or their primary contacts mentioned it on their own. We therefore used a combination of the short MMSE and the Global Deterioration Score for an estimation. This score identified participants suffering from poor cognitive functioning and related limitations, but cannot replace a diagnosis (23). Thus, this finding has to be interpreted with caution.
Although not highly prevalent, cases with ongoing cancer (6%) as well as pain conditions (7%) seem noteworthy. Among the Danish centenarians, there were no reports of either condition as ongoing, and cancer was only reported among past conditions (12%) (9). In the Tokyo Centenarian Study, no distinction was made between prior and current cancer (9%) (8). Thus, it is an open question whether ongoing cancer at age 100 could represent a more recent development.
Pain, mentioned in one prior study only, seems to be an overlooked issue in centenarians. Darviri et al. (10) found that among Greek centenarians, 30% often suffered from musculoskeletal pain, 19% from back/lower back pain, and 15% from headaches. In our sample, we found comparable percentages. That a substantial number of centenarians suffers from pain is concerning and deserves more attention, in particular considering centenarians’ apparent willingness to share this information when asked.
The present study has some limitations: First, although our study was population-based, not all centenarians or their families agreed to participation. As centenarians with lower education, more cognitive impairment and health issues were more likely to decline participation, our sample may be somewhat positively selected. Second, information on health conditions was not based on medical records, but combined information from centenarians and their primary contact. Given the high convergence between both information sources, we believe that our data are trustworthy. Finally, investigation of gender differences would have been useful, yet gendered survival ratio resulted in a small number of males (n = 12).
In conclusion, German centenarians experience substantial health issues, but the nature of common conditions points to potential opportunities for improving quality of life through preventive efforts (e.g., concerning gait/balance and mobility ) and optimal disease management (e.g., pain), even at this very advanced age.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Manuscript received on 18 August 2015, revised version accepted on
2 December 2015.
Prof. Dr. phil Daniela S. Jopp Ph.D.
University of Lausanne
Institute of Psychology
a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98 CrossRef
Life Course Perspectives, Switzerland: Prof. Dr. phil. Jopp Ph.D.
University of Massachusetts Boston, USA: Boerner, Ph.D .
Heidelberg University: Dr. phil. Rott
The Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study (Jopp, Rott, Boerner, & Kruse) was funded by the Robert Bosch Foundation and the Dietmar Hopp Foundation. Prof. Jopp is also grateful for the support of the Brookdale Foundation Group. The authors would furthermore like to thank the study team and the study participants and their families for having made this study possible.
|1.||Vaupel JW, Carey JR, Christensen K, et al.: Biodemographic trajectories of longevity. Science 1998; 280: 855–60 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|2.||Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW: Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009; 374: 1196–208 CrossRef|
|3.||Rochon PA, Gruneir A, Wu W, et al.: Demographic characteristics and healthcare use of centenarians: A population-based cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 86–93 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|4.||Richmond RL, Law J, Kay-Lambkin F: Physical, mental, and cognitive function in a convenience sample of centenarians in Australia. |
J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59: 1080–6 CrossRef MEDLINE
|5.||Motta M, Ferlito L, Magnolfi S, et al.: Cognitive and functional status in the extreme longevity. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 46: 245–52 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|6.||Davey A, Elias MF, Siegler IC, et al.: Cognitive function, physical performance, health, and disease: norms from the Georgia Centenarian study. Exp Aging Res 2010; 36: 394–425 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|7.||Sachdev PS, Levitan C, Crawford J, et al.: The Sydney Centenarian Study: methodology and profile of centenarians and near-centenarians. Int Psychogeriatr 2013; 25: 993–1005 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|8.||Takayama M, Hirose N, Arai Y, et al.: Morbidity of Tokyo-area centenarians and its relationship to functional status. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci 2007; 62: 774–82 CrossRef|
|9.||Andersen-Ranberg K, Schroll M, Jeune B: Healthy centenarians do not exist, but autonomous centenarians do: A population-based study of morbidity among Danish centenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 900–8 CrossRef|
|10.||Darviri C, Demakakos P, Charizani F, et al.: Assessment of the health status of Greek centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 46: 67–78 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|11.||Evert J, Lawler E, Bogan H, Perls T: Morbidity profiles of centenarians: Survivors, delayers, and escapers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: M232–7 CrossRef|
|12.||Galioto A, Dominguez LJ, Pineo A, et al.: Cardiovascular risk factors in centenarians. Exp Gerontol 2008; 43: 106–13 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|13.||Cimarolli VR, Jopp DS: Sensory impairments and their associations with functional disability in a sample of the oldest-old. Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 1977–84 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|14.||Rott C, d‘Heureuse V, Kliegel M, Schönemann P, Becker G: Die Heidelberger Hundertjährigen-Studie: Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Hochaltrigkeitsforschung. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2001; 34: 356–64 CrossRef|
|15.||Becker G, Rott C, d’Heureuse V, Kliegel M, Schönemann-Gieck P: Funktionale Kompetenz und Plegebedürftigkeit nach SGB XI bei Hundertjährigen. Die besondere Bedeutung des kognitiven Status. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2003; 36: 437–46 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|16.||Kliegel M, Moor C, Rott C: Cognitive status and development in the oldest old: a longitudinal analysis from the Heidelberg Centenarian Study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2004; 39: 143–56 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|17.||Jopp DS, Rott C, Boerner K, Boch K, Kruse A: Zweite Heidelberger Hundertjährigen-Studie: Herausforderungen und Stärken des Lebens mit 100 Jahren [Second Heidelberg Centenarian Study: Challenges and strengths of life at age 100]. Robert-Bosch-Stiftung, Schriftenreihe Alter und Demographie. Stuttgart: Robert-Bosch-Stiftung GmbH 2013.|
|18.||Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T: The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1136–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|19.||Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-mental state”: |
a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98 CrossRef
|20.||Holtsberg PA, Poon LW, Noble CA, Martin P: Mini-Mental State Exam status of community-dwelling cognitively intact centenarians. Int Psychogeriatr 1995; 7: 417–27 CrossRef|
|21.||Jahn K, Kressig RW, Bridenbaugh SA, Brandt T, Schniepp R: Dizziness and unstable gait in old age: Etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 387–94 VOLLTEXT|
|22.||Plass D, Vos T, Hornberg C, Scheidt-Nave C, Zeeb H, Krämer A: Trends in disease burden in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 629–38 VOLLTEXT|
|23.||Mahlberg R: The investigation and differential diagnosis of dementias. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107: 675–6 VOLLTEXT|
Gérontologie et société, 201810.3917/gs1.157.0111
Frontiers in Pain Research, 202210.3389/fpain.2022.807179
Scientific Reports, 202010.1038/s41598-020-78842-w
Journal of Applied Gerontology, 202210.1177/07334648211016113
Frontiers in Medicine, 201810.3389/fmed.2018.00189
Journal of Aging and Health, 201910.1177/0898264317737894