Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Emergency Trauma Admissions
Perioperative management, and handling hemorrhage
; ; ; ; ;
Background: Direct (non-vitamin-K-dependent) oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are given as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to prevent stroke and embolic disease in patients with atrial fibrillation that is not due to pathology of the heart valves. Fatal hemorrhage is rarer when DOACs are given (non-valvular atrial fibrillation: odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI: 0.48; 0.96], and venous thromboembolism: OR 0.54; [0.22; 1.32]). 48% of emergency trauma patients need an emergency operation or early surgery. Clotting disturbances elevate the mortality of such patients to 43%, compared to 17% in patients without a clotting disturbance. This underscores the importance of the proper, targeted treatment of trauma patients who are taking DOAC.
Methods: This review is based on articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on a summary of expert opinion and the recommendations of the relevant medical specialty societies.
Results: Peak DOAC levels are reached 2–4 hours after the drug is taken. In patients with normal renal and hepatic function, no drug accumulation, and no drug interactions, the plasma level of DOAC 24 hours after administration is generally too low to cause any clinically relevant risk of bleeding. The risk of drug accumulation is higher in patients with renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance [CrCl] of 30 mL/min or less). Dabigatran levels can be estimated from the thrombin time, ecarin clotting time, and diluted thrombin time, while levels of factor Xa inhibitors can be estimated by means of calibrated chromogenic anti–factor Xa activity tests. Routine clotting studies do not reliably reflect the anticoagulant activity of DOAC. Surgery should be postponed, if possible, until at least 24–48 hours after the last dose of DOAC. For patients with mild, non–life threatening hemorrhage, it suffices to discontinue DOAC; for patients with severe hemorrhage, there are special treatment algorithms that should be followed.
Conclusion: DOACs in the setting of hemorrhage are a clinical challenge in the traumatological emergency room because of the inadequate validity of the relevant laboratory tests. An emergency antidote is now available only for dabigatran.
Direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) offer an alternative to vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolus formation in patients who have non-valvular atrial fibrillation and at least one risk factor for stroke (1–6, e1–e8). They are claimed to be characterized by both easier handling and a more favorable benefit–risk profile, particularly with regard to intracranial and other life-threatening hemorrhages, and increasing numbers of patients are being treated with these new substances. Direct oral anticoagulants have also been licensed for treating and preventing recurrence of venous thromboembolisms, for the perioperative prevention of venous thromboembolisms in hip and knee replacement surgery (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), and for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (rivaroxaban with acetylsalicylic acid, with or without clopidogrel or ticagrelor). The benefits and risks of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists depend essentially on successful calibration of the International Normalized Ratio (INR).
The advantage of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants is that they achieve comparable efficacy and an improved safety profile while dispensing with the need for regular monitoring of laboratory parameters (2–6, e1–e3, e8). Disadvantages arise from the limited availability of antidotes and the lack of laboratory confirmation by means of the coagulation tests available in the routine and emergency situations (e8). Demonstration of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants and negation of their effect constitute a challenge, particularly in an emergency scenario with immediate surgical consequences and bleeding (7). Fully one fourth of patients on anticoagulants have to suspend their treatment for a time within 2 years, usually because of operations/interventions (e9). Owing to the introduction of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, together with demographic change, increasing numbers of elderly persons at higher risk of falls and fractures are receiving direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants. The above-mentioned challenge for hospital staff dealing with emergency trauma admissions is thus growing in importance (6, e10, e11). The data of the TraumaRegister® of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) show that the number of elderly patients with comorbidities admitted to emergency trauma facilities has been on the increase for years (e12). Emergency operations and early surgical treatment are necessary in 5.5% and 42.5%, respectively, of (severely) injured patients, the most frequently performed procedures being laparotomy (50%), craniotomy (20%), thoracotomy (10%), and pelvic interventions (e13). Retrospectively, coagulation disorders, either congenital or acquired (e.g., due to anticoagulants), were associated with elevated mortality in trauma with or without head injury (43% versus 17%; e10, e11, e14, e15). Combining data from three large meta-analyses, Table 1 shows the rates of spontaneous bleeding, including fatal hemorrhage, for direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants versus the standard vitamin K antagonists in patients being treated for venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation (8–10).
This review is based on data derived from a selective survey of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using appropriate search terms, together with expert opinion and recommendations issued by the following professional bodies: American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of the direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants are summarized in the eTable. Peak concentrations are attained 2 to 4 hours after intake. In the presence of normal renal function, levels decrease over a period of 12 to 24 hours, first rapidly and then more slowly. Renal function is of crucial significance for the plasma concentration and duration of action of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants, because they are eliminated to a varying extent via the kidneys; the risk of accumulation in the case of renal failure is highest for dabigatran, followed in descending order by edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban (11–13, e16). Concentrations of rivaroxaban are increased in severe disorders of renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 15–29 mL/min); moderate renal failure (CrCl 30–49 mL/min) led to an increase in the rate of severe bleeding from 3.4% to 4.5% in patients on rivaroxaban (5, 6). Cumulation effects requiring dose adjustment have been reported for apixaban from CrCl <30 mL/min and for dabigatran and edoxaban from CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min. Moderate to severe impairments of hepatic function must be taken into account (alanine aminotransferase [ALT]/aspartate aminotransferase [AST] >2 × upper reference value / total bilirubin 1.5 × upper reference value). A scoring system has been developed to check anticoagulation and assess the risk of hemorrhage during treatment with vitamin K antagonists:
- Albumin 2.5–3.49 g/dL and/or creatinine 1.01–1.99 mg/dL = 1 point
- Albumin <2.5 g/dL and/or creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL = 2 points.
With an overall score of 4 points or more the bleeding risk is high (e17). Details of the various dose adjustments for individual direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants in the presence of impaired renal and hepatic function can be found in the respective summaries of product characteristics.
The bioavailability of dabigatran is lower than for any of the other substances, so even small fluctuations in absorption lead to considerable differences in the steepness of the rate of increase in plasma (14) (eTable). The intestinal absorption of dabigatran is pH-dependent and may be lower with parallel intake of proton pump inhibitors. Due to its low protein binding, dabigatran (and edoxaban) is the only substance that is dialyzable in appreciable amounts (15, e18). Apixaban and rivaroxaban are partly metabolized via cytochrome CYP3A3; comedication with amiodarone, carbamazepine, clarithromycin, dronedarone, verapamil, quinidines, ketoconazole, fluconazole, ciclosporin, erythromycin, or diltiazem can lead to variations in plasma concentration with a significant increase in the risk of hemorrhage (5, 6). The dosage of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants varies depending on the indication.
Treatment with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants is currently not routinely monitored (5, e8), but monitoring may improve the benefit–risk profile if the specific characteristics of the individual patient are taken into account (e19). All of these substances attain their peak concentrations and thus their maximal anticoagulatory effect 2–4 h after intake of the last dose (5). For estimation of the current plasma concentration it is important to know:
- Which direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulant was taken how long before blood sampling
- The dosage
- Whether there is any impairment of renal/hepatic function and/or relevant comedication (5, 6).
For all direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants, the time course of plasma concentrations and anticoagulatory effects can be approximately projected: 24 h after last intake of a substance with a half-life of 10–12 h the plasma concentration will no longer be a significant risk factor for hemorrhage, provided there is no kidney/liver function impairment, relevant interaction with comedication, or accumulation (5, 6).
To date there is no universally available validated (rapid) test system for any of the direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants that possesses satisfactory sensitivity and specificity (e20). Figure 1 shows the range of results displayed by the available means of measurement (6, 16).
The factor IIa (thrombin) inhibitor dabigatran
The thrombin time and the ecarin clotting time can be used to confirm a dabigatran concentration sufficient to achieve an anticoagulatory effect (12, e8, e21). The ecarin clotting time is based on the action of ecarin (a metalloprotease), which in the absence of thrombin inhibitors converts prothrombin to meizothrombin and then, following fibrinogen cleavage, to fibrin. Ecarin clotting time is measured proportionally to thrombin inhibitor concentration. The thrombin time ratio shows a linear dose–effect relationship at therapeutic concentrations. The activated partial thromboplastin time shows a limited dose–effect relationship; the variable sensitivity means that the results have to be interpreted with caution and not without knowledge of the reagents used (16). Particularly at higher concentrations of dabigatran the curve flattens and offers no correlation with activated partial thromboplastin time (12). The so-called diluted thrombin time offered by many coagulation testing facilities demonstrates thrombin inhibition directly with a linear relationship to previously measured plasma concentrations and serves as a quantitative measure (5, 16). In the event that the time and amount of the most recent dose of dabigatran are unknown, normal values for thrombin time, ecarin clotting time, and diluted thrombin time indicate the absence of dabigatran in any clinically relevant concentration (16, 17).
Factor Xa inhibitors
Chromogenic anti-factor-Xa activity tests can be used to estimate the plasma concentrations of factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban), but require calibration with substance-specific reagents (16, 18, e21). No calibration standard is available for the emergency scenario. Lacking anti-factor-Xa activity in plasma with or without specific calibration indicates the absence of an active anticoagulatory level of factor Xa inhibitors (16). After intake of factor Xa inhibitors, peak concentrations at 2–4 h are accompanied by prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time to levels 1.2 (1.6) to 2 times the upper reference values. Thrombin time is not suitable for determining the anticoagulatory effect of factor Xa inhibitors.
Owing to the slight and/or variable increases within the therapeutic range, the routinely performed coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time/partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time) do not permit confident estimation of anticoagulatory effect (16). For both tests, results in the reference range beyond 3 h (dabigatran) or 4 h (factor Xa inhibitors) after intake of a direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulant broadly rule out therapeutic concentrations with a clinically relevant danger of hemorrhage (16, 18). Urine test strips for qualitative assessment without clinical validation have been developed (rivaroxaban) or are in the process of development (apixaban and dabigatran) (19); the usefulness of viscoelastic test procedures and endogenous thrombin potential is unclear (e22, e23).
Perioperative management of emergency trauma
The perioperative management of patients who have been treated with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants is challenging in the emergency scenario, because the availability of specific antidotes is limited. November 2015 saw the licensing of the monoclonal antibody fragment idarucizumab (FAB fragment), a specific antidote to dabigatran, for intravenous administration in adults (20, e24). Factor Xa inhibitor antidotes (PRT4445 [andexanet alpha]; PER977 [aripazine]) are in the process of clinical testing (phases II und III) and could be approved for use in the near future (21–23, e25, e26).
In the absence of accumulation, interruption of the anticoagulant treatment together with supportive measures, e.g., support/maintenance of diuresis, suffices in most patients. There are no precise data on the risk of stroke and embolism during the treatment break. If at all possible, surgical interventions should be postponed until at least 12 h, ideally 24 h, after the last dose (5). The summaries of product characteristics for all direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants recommend that the substances should be discontinued at least 24 h before a planned operation. This also holds true for conditions with minimal bleeding that is easily controlled. The EHRA recommendations are as follows: for minor surgical interventions/procedures involving no danger of bleeding (e.g., hand surgery, dental extraction, “anterior” eye surgery), interruption of treatment with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants for 12–24 h before a planned operation depending on whether the drug is taken once daily (24 h) or twice daily (12 h); for intermediate interventions with low bleeding risk, interruption for at least 24 h; and for major operations with high risk of hemorrhage, interruption for 48 h (5) (Table 2). This last category includes orthopedic interventions, spinal column surgery, and neurosurgical operations on the brain and spinal cord. The French Working Group on Perioperative Hemostasis and the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Hemostasis suggest extended interruption of treatment before interventions with a high risk of bleeding (24, 25) (Table 2). Spinal and epidural anesthesia and lumbar puncture necessitate complete hemostasis (5). Although no confirmation has been provided by prospective data, plasma concentrations of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants can be taken into account in the planning of interventions. Plasma concentrations <30 ng/mL can be viewed as the threshold level, and in the presence of concentrations between 30 and 400 ng/mL interventions/procedures should be postponed and the levels checked at 12- to 24-h intervals (25).
Antagonism of dabigatran
The anticoagulatory effect of dabigatran can be almost completely counteracted within a few minutes by idarucizumab (2 × 2.5 g/50 mL as successive infusion or boluses) (20). In a subgroup of patients plasma concentrations of dabigatran could again be demonstrated after 24 h, so renewed administration of idarucizumab should be considered in the event of repeated emergency interventions or new bleeding. The highest single dose yet investigated in healthy probands is 8 g. On the basis of experimental data, activated charcoal can be given to inhibit absorption of dabigatran if the last dose of the anticoagulant was taken less than 2 h beforehand (22, 23, 26, 27). There are only a small number of studies on the interaction of dabigatran and dialysis, so the risk of bleeding at the sites of access must be borne in mind (5, 15, 26, 27, e18). In the absence of severe hemorrhage associated with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants, there is no need for prophylactic administration of hemostatically active substances such as prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh plasma.
If emergency surgery cannot be delayed in a patient in whom anticoagulatory medication is still partially or fully effective, the increased risk of hemorrhage has to be anticipated. The appropriate course of action depends on the scale of the bleeding and is outlined below.
Management of minor/non-life-threatening hemorrhage
All recommendations are based not so much on clinical data as on expert opinion, summaries of product characteristics, and clinical chemistry endpoints (5). In the case of minor/non-life-threatening hemorrhage with controlled blood loss and no relevance for the circulation, discontinuation combined with general/supportive measures, e.g., mechanical/surgical hemostasis and fluid treatment to maintain organ perfusion/diuresis, suffices (5). In the absence of accumulation, clinical hemostasis can be expected 12–24 h after the last dose of anticoagulant (e27); with intake of dabigatran and CrCl of 50–80 mL/min, after 24–48 h; with CrCl of 30–50 mL/min, after 36–48 h; and with CrCl < 30 mL/min, after ≥ 48 h (5). Packed red blood cells should be substituted if necessary, and thrombocyte concentrates should be considered in the case of thrombocytopenia ≤ 60 × 109/L or thrombocytopathy (5).
Management of major/life-threatening hemorrhage
The procedure in the event of heavy bleeding is shown in the algorithm in Figure 2. Administration of direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants must be stopped immediately. In the presence of circulatory instability the usual vasopressors are used, while patients receiving massive transfusions may require plasma/platelet products and fibrinogen concentrates (5, 6). Should conventional measures prove inadequate, off-label administration of prothrombin complex concentrates or activated prothrombin complex concentrate and/or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in the recommended dosages can be considered (5, 6, 22, 23, 27–30) (Figure 2). In experimental studies (dabigatran) and tests on healthy volunteers (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban), the best effect has been documented for prothrombin complex concentrate (29–32, e27–e33); no prospective randomized trials have been conducted. Experiments showed a dubious effect for rFVIIa (e34, e35); there is no clinical evidence for the efficacy of this substance and further evaluation is required (5). According to investigations in vitro, activated prothrombin complex concentrate was more effective than prothrombin complex concentrate in normalizing the coagulation parameters (e33, e36). The risk of thromboembolic events during treatment with prothrombin complex concentrate must be borne in mind (5). The use of further procoagulants, e.g., tranexamic acid or desmopressin (in coagulation disorder or thrombopathy) can be considered, although here too data are lacking. Successful dialysis in association with emergency surgery resulting in severe hemorrhage has been described (e37). Due to its high protein binding, apixaban and rivaroxaban may be eliminated by means of plasmapheresis. These procedures are practicable only to a limited degree in the acute situation and depend on local availability and infrastructure.
Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
Every second victim of (severe) trauma suffers head injury, with any of various forms of intracranial bleeding, in addition to their extracranial injuries (e12). In those taking direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants, intracranial hemorrhage is associated with high mortality (33, e38). It is known that patients who are being treated with vitamin K antagonists and suffer traumatic intracranial hemorrhage may experience ongoing bleeding or even additional new bleeding with overall increased hematoma volumes (34). Vitamin K and vitamin-K-dependent coagulation factors are administered with the aim of normalizing the INR (35, 36). Attainment of INR <1.3 and reduction of blood pressure to <160 mm Hg within 4 h was associated with a lower increase in the volume of intracranial hematomas (e39). Whether late posttraumatic hemorrhage also occurs in patients on direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants and what steps should then be taken remains unclear. Owing to the limited availability of specific antidotes to direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants and the restriction of guidelines to the counteracting of vitamin K antagonists, these recommendations are also valid for the treatment of intracranial hemorrhage in patients on direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants (35, 36). Here too, the primary goal is swift correction of coagulation (Figure 2). After this has been achieved, surgical treatment of intracranial hemorrhages and other acute decompensating intracranial space-occupying lesions can be considered depending on the clinical circumstances (e40). Prospective studies and data on the reliability of clinical chemistry are needed to evaluate these measures.
Resumption of treatment after surgery and intervention
Patients being treated with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants do not need to be switched to other anticoagulants before operation (5, 37, e8); indeed, early prospective studies have shown that switching is associated with a higher risk of bleeding than discontinuation, with no difference in the risk of thromboembolism (e32). The treatment with direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants can be resumed in therapeutic dosage 24 h after surgery with minimal risk of hemorrhage (37). Some authors have proposed shorter periods of 6–8 h (25). After interventions bearing a high risk of bleeding without postoperative immobilization, the interval before resumption should be 48–72 h, and only then in the presence of stable hemostasis and a dry wound. Patients who are immobilized after surgery must be temporarily switched to low-molecular heparin in prophylactic dosage (24, 37). Hemostasis having been achieved, this treatment should begin 6–8 h after operation; after 48–72 h the patient can go back to the direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulant given previously (24, 37). In patients with traumatic epidural or subdural hematomas the recommendation is for resumption of anticoagulation starting four weeks after injury or intervention, except in the presence of chronic alcoholism with liver failure, although data are lacking (5).
Due to the limited availability of validated (rapid) test systems and antidotes, direct or non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants and the associated bleeding represent a challenge in the treatment of trauma victims in the emergency department.
Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Maegele has received consultancy fees from TEM International, CSL Behring, Bayer, and LFB France and reimbursement of costs for congress attendance, travel, and accommodation from TEM International, CSL Behring, Bayer, and LFB France. He has received payment for giving a presentation at scientific meetings and funding for a research project of his own initiation from LFB France and CSL Behring.
Dr. Grottke has received consultancy fees from Böhringer Ingelheim, Portolo, and Bayer and reimbursement of travel and accommodation costs from Böhringer Ingelheim and Bayer. He has received payment for giving a presentation at scientific meetings and funding for a research project of his own initiation from Böhringer Ingelheim and CSL Behring.
Dr. Schöchl has received payments for giving presentations at scientific meetings from Bayer and CSL Behring.
Prof. Sakowitz has received reimbursement of costs for congress attendance, travel, and accommodation as well as payments for giving presentations at scientific meetings from CSL Behring.
Prof. Spannagl has received consultancy fees from Bayer, Böhringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer and payments for giving presentations from Bayer, Böhringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer.
Dr. Koscielny has received consultancy fees from Bayer, Siemens, Leo Pharma, and Daiichi Sankyo.
Manuscript received on 5 October 2015, revised version accepted on
17 May 2016.
Translated from the original German by David Roseveare
Prof. Dr. med. Marc Maegele
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Sporttraumatologie
Kliniken der Stadt Köln-Merheim
Universität Witten/Herdecke (Campus Köln-Merheim)
Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Köln, Germany
For eReferences please refer to:
Experimental Hemostaseology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen: PD Dr. Grottke
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, AUVA Emergency Hospital, Salzburg (Austria):
PD Dr. Schöchl
Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg: Prof. Sakowitz
Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich: Prof. Spannagl
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin: PD Dr. Koscielny
|1.||Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al.: 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation-developed with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2012; 14: 1385–413 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|2.||Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Reilly PA, Wallentin L: Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1875–6 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|3.||Chai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M, Isayama T, Lim W: The impact of bleeding complications in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 2014; 124: 2450–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|4.||Dentali F, Riva N, Crowther M, Turpie AG, Lip GY, Ageno W: Efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Circulation 2012; 126: 2381–91 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|5.||Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al.: Updated European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015; 17: 1467–507 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|6.||Kovacs RJ, Flaker G, Saxonhouse SJ, et al.: Practical management of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1340–60 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|7.||Cotton B, McCarthy JJ, Holcomb JB: Acutely injured patients on dabigatran. N Engl J Med 2011; 24: 365: 2039–40 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|8.||Gómez-Outes A, Terleira-Fernández A, Lecumberri R, Suárez-Gea M, Vargas-Castrillón E: Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2014; 134: 774–82 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|9.||Caldeira D, Rodrigues FB, Barra M, et al.: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and major bleeding-related fatality in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2015; 101: 1204–11 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|10.||Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al.: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta- analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 955–62 CrossRef|
|11.||Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Mazur D: Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmakodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010; 49: 259–68 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|12.||van Ryn J, Stangier J, Haertter S, et al.: Dabigatran etexilate: a novel, reversible, oral direct thrombin inhibitor: interpretation of coagulation assays and reversal of anticoagulant activity. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 1116–27 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|13.||Wang Y, Bajorek B: New oral anticoagulants in practice: phamacological and practical considerations. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2014; 14: 175–89 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|14.||Blech S, Ebener T, Ludwig-Schwellinger E, Stangier J, Roth W: The metabolism and disposition of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2008; 36: 386–99 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|15.||Khadzhynov D, Wagner F, Formella S, et al.: Effective elimination of dabigatran by haemodialysis. A phase I single-centre study in patients with end-stage renal disease. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 596–605 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|16.||Cuker A, Siegal DM, Crowther MA, Garcia DA: Laboratory measurements of the anticoagulant activity of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 1128–39 CrossRef MEDLINEPubMed Central|
|17.||Lindahl TL, Baghaei F, Blixter IF, et al.: Expert group on coagulation of the external quality assurance in laboratory medicine in Sweden. Effects of the oral, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on five common coagulation assays. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 371–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|18.||Baglin T: The role of the laboratory in treatment with new oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 122–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|19.||Harenberg J, Krämer S, Du S, Weiss C, Krämer R: Concept of a point of care test to detect new oral anticoagulants in urine samples. Thromb J 2013; 11: 15 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|20.||Pollack CV, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al.: Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 511–20 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|21.||Siegal DM, Curnutte JT, Connolly SJ, et al.: Andexanet alpha for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor activity. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2413–24 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|22.||Crowther M, Crowther MA: Antidotes for novel oral anticoagulants: current status and future potential. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35: 1736–45 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|23.||Liotta EM, Levasseur-Franklin KE, Naidech AM: Reversal of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 127–33 CrossRef|
|24.||Sié P, Samama CM, Godier A, et al.: Sugery and invasive procedures in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants: thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors. Recommendations of the working group on perioperative haemostasis and the french study group on thrombosis and heamostasis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 104: 669–76 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|25.||Faraoni D, Levy JH, Albaladejo P, Samama CM: Groupe d´Interet en Hemostase Perioperative: Updates in the perioperative and emergency management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral antocoagulants. Crit Care 2015; 19: 203 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|26.||Siegal DM, Crowther MA: Acute management of bleeding in patients on novel oral antocoagulants. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 489–98 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|27.||Kaatz S, Kouides PA, Garcia DA, et al.: Guidance on the emergent reversal of oral thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 141–5 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|28.||Crowther MA, Warkentin TE: Managing bleeding in anticoagulated patients with a focus on novel therapeutic agents. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 107–10 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|29.||Baumann Kreuziger LM, Keenan JC, Morton CT, Dries DJ: Management of the bleeding patient receiving new oral anticoagulants: a role for prothrombin complex concentrates. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 583794.|
|30.||Díaz MQ, Borobia AM, Núñez MA, et al.: Use of prothrombin complex concentrates for urgent reversal of dabigatran in the emergency department. Haematologica 2013; 98: e143–4 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|31.||Majeed A, Schulman S: Bleeding and antidotes in new oral anticoagulants. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2013; 26: 191–202 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|32.||Siegal DM, Garcia DA, Crowther MA: How I treat target-specific oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding. Blood 2014; 123: 1152–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|33.||Hart RG, Diener HC, Yang S, et al.: Intraccranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: The Re-Ly trial. Stroke 2012; 43: 1511–7 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|34.||Flibotte JJ, Hagan N, O´Donell J, Greenberg SM, Rosand J: Warfarin, hemotoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2004; 63: 1059–64 CrossRef|
|35.||Beynon C, Sakowitz OW, Störzinger D, et al.: Intracranial haemorrhage in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2015; 136: 560–5 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|36.||Koscielny J, Baeyer-Westendorf J, von Heymann C, et al.: Risk of bleeding and haemorrhagic complication with rivaroxaban: periprocedural management of haemostasis. Hämostaseologie 2012; 32: 287–93 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|37.||Lai A, Davidson N, Galloway SW, Thachil J: Perioperative management of patients on new oral anticoagulants. BJS 2014; 101: 742–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|38.||Spyropopoulos AC, Douketis JD: How I treat anticoagulated patients undergoing elective procedure or surgery. Blood 2012; 120: 2954–62 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|39.||Crowther MA, Warkentin TE: Bleeding risk and the management of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy: focus on new anticoagulant agents. Blood 2008; 111: 4871–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|40.||Siegal DM, Crowther MA: Acute management of bleeding in patients on novel oral anticoagulants. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 489–98 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e1.||Wagner HO, Liesenfeld A: DEGAM Leitlinien 2013: Neue orale Antokoagulantien (bei nicht valvulärem Vorhiflimmern), AWMF-Registernr. 053/032, Klasse S1; DEGAM www.degam-leitlinien.de (last accessed on 8 June 2016).|
|e2.||NICE Implementation Collaborative: Consensus supporting local implementation of NICE guidance on use of the novel (non-vitamin K antagonists) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation 2014. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg180/resources-nic-consensus-statement-on-the-use-of-noacs-243733501 (last accessed on 8 June 2016).|
|e3.||January CT, Wann LC, Alpert JS, et al.: 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. JACC 2014; 64: 2246–80 CrossRef CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e4.||Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al.: Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139–51 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e5.||Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al.: Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883–91 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e6.||Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al.: Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981–92 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e7.||Guigliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al.: Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2093–104 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e8.||Gómez-Outes A, Suárez-Gea ML, Lecumberri R, Terleira-Fernández AI, Vargas-Castrillón E: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants: pharmacology, indications, management and future perspectives. Eur J Haematol 2015; 95: 389–404 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e9.||Healey JS, Eikelboom J, Douketis J, et al.: Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation 2012; 126: 343–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e10.||Inui T, Parina R, Chang DC, Inui TS, Coimbra R: Mortality after ground-level fall in the elderly patients taking oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation/flutter: a long-term analysis of risks versus benefit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76: 642–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e11.||Peck KA, Calvo R, Schlechter M, et al.: The impact of preinjury anticoagulants and prescription antiplatelet agents on outcomes in older patients with traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76: 431–6 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e12.||Das TraumaRegister DGU: www.traumaregister.de (last accessed on 8 June 2016).|
|e13.||Lödgers T, Lefering R, Schneppendahl J, et al.: Abbruch der Schockraumdiagnostik und Notfalloperation beim Polytrauma: Inzidenz und klinische Relevanz. Unfallchirurg 2010; 10: 832–8.|
|e14.||Wutzler S, Maegele M, Marzi I, et al.: Association of preexisting medical conditions with in-hospital mortality in multiple-trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 75–81 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e15.||Batchelor JS, Grayson A: A meta-analysis to determine the effect of anticoagulation on mortality in patients with blunt head trauma. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26: 525–30 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e16.||Harenberg J, Erdle S, Marx S, Krämer R: Determination of rivaroxaban in human plasma samples. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38: 178–84 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e17.||Efird LM, Mishkin DS, Berlowitz DR, et al.: Stratifying the risks of oral anticoagulation in patients with liver disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014; 7: 461–7 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e18.||Chai-Adisaksopha C, Hillis C, Lim W, Boonyawat K, Moffat K, Crowther M: Hemodialysis for the treatment of dabigatran-associated bleeding: a case report and systematic review. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 1790–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e19.||Reilly P, Lehr T, Haertter S, et al.: The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in artrial fibrillation patients: The RE-LY trial (randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 321–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e20.||Sibbing D, Spannagl M: Direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. Hämostaseologie 2014; 34: 78–84 MEDLINE|
|e21.||Koscielny J, Rutkauskaite E: Blutungen unter NOAK: Evidenz und praktisches Vorgehen [bleedings under NOAC (non Vitamin-K dependent oral anticoagulants): evidence and practical management]. Hämostaseologie 2015; 35: 43–53.|
|e22.||Dias JD, Norem K, Doorneweerd D, Thurer RL, Popovsky M, Olmert L: Use of thromboelastography (TEG) for the detection of new oral anticoagulants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139: 665–73 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e23.||Dinkelaar J, Patiwael S, Harenberg J, Leyte A, Brinkmann HJ: Global coagulation tests: their applicability for measuring direct factor Xa- and thrombin inhibition and reversal of anticoagulation by prothrombin complex concentrate. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014; 52: 1615–23 MEDLINE|
|e24.||Grottke O, Honickel M, van Ryn J, ten Cate H, Rossaint R, Spronk H: Idarucizumab, a specific dabigatran reversal agent, reduces blood loss in a procine model of trauma with dabigatran anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 29: 66: 1518–9.|
|e25.||Husted S, Verheugt FW, Comuth WJ: Reversal strategies for NOACs: State of development, possible clinical applications and future persepectives. Drug Saf 2016; 39: 5–13 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e26.||Gómez-Outes A, Suárez-Gea ML, Lecumberri R, Terleira-Fernández AI, Vargas-Castrillón E: Specific antidotes in development for reversal of novel anticoagulants. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2014; 9: 2–10.|
|e27.||Levi M, Erenberg E, Kamphuisen PW: Bleeding risk and reversal strategies for old and new anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 1705–12 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e28.||Grottke O, van Ryn J, Spronk H, Rossaint R: Prothrombin complex concentrates and a specific antidote to dabigatran are effective ex-vivo in reversing the effects of dabigatran in an anticoagulation/liver trauma experimental model. Crit Care 2014; 18: R27 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e29.||Honickel M, Treutler S, van Ryn J, Tillmann S, Rossaint R, Grottke O: Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation ex vivo: porcine study comparing prothrombin complex concentrates and idaricizumab. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113: 728–40 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e30.||Honickel M, Maron B, van Ryn J, et al.: Therapy with activated prothrombin complex concentrate is effective in reducing dabigatran-associated blood loss in a porcine polytrauma model. Thromb Haemost 2016; 115: 271–84 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e31.||Honickel M, Braunschweig T, van Ryn J, et al.: Prothrombin complex concentrate is effective in treating the antocoagulant affects of dabigatran in a porcine polytrauma model. Anaesthesiology 2015; 123: 1350–61 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e32.||Beyer-Westendorf J, Förster K, Pannach S, et al.: Rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban bleeding in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAK registry. Blood 2014; 124: 955–62 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e33.||Marlu R, Hodaj E, Paris A, Albaladejo P, Crackowski JL, Pernod G: Effect of non-specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban. A randomized crossover ex vivo study in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 217–24 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e34.||Perzborn E, Heitmeier S, Laux V, Buchmüller A: Reversal of rivaroxaban-induced anticoagulation with prothrombin complex concentrate, activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VIIa in vitro. Thromb Res 2014; 133: 671–81 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e35.||Zhou W, Schwarting S, Illanes S, et al.: Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage associated with the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Stroke 2011; 42: 3594–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e36.||Escolar G, Fernandez-Gallego V, Arellano-Rodrigo E, et al.: Reversal of apixaban induced alterations in haemostasis by different coagulation factor concentrates: significance of studies in vitro with circulationg human blood. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e78696.|
|e37.||Getta B, Muller N, Motum P, Hsu D, Zebeljan D, Rosenfeld D: Intermittend haemodialysis and continous veno-venous dialysis are effective in mitigating major bleeding due to dabigatran. Br J Haematol 2015; 169: 603–4 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e38.||Purrucker JC, Haas K, Rizos T, et al.: Early clinical and radiological course, management, and outcome of cerebral hemorrhage related to new oral anticoagulants. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73: 169–77 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e39.||Kuramatsu JB, Gerner ST, Schellinger PD, et al.: Anticoagulant reversal, blood pressure levels, and anticoagulant resumption in patients with anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2015; 313: 824–36 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e40.||Beynon C, Potzy A, Jungk C, Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW: Rapid anticoagulation reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate before emergency brain tumor surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2015; 27: 246–51 CrossRef MEDLINE|
Emergency Medicine International, 202210.1155/2022/1251388
Perioperatives Management unfallchirurgischer Patienten unter Therapie mit direkten oralen AntikoagulanzienDer Unfallchirurg, 201910.1007/s00113-019-0693-x
Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: An Analysis of 15,099 Patients of the AltersTraumaRegister DGU®Medicina, 202210.3390/medicina58030379
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 201710.3238/arztebl.2017.0175b
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 201910.3238/arztebl.2019.0799
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 201710.3238/arztebl.2017.0176
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 201710.3238/arztebl.2017.0175a