The Perioperative Care of Older Patients
Time for a new, interdisciplinary approach
; ; ; ; ;
Background: Elderly patients are a growing and vulnerable group with an elevated perioperative risk. Perioperative treatment pathways that take these patients’ special risks and requirements into account are often not implemented in routine clinical practice.
Methods : This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, the AWMF guideline database, and the Cochrane database for guidelines from Germany and abroad, meta-analyses, and Cochrane reviews.
Results: The care of elderly patients who need surgery calls for an interdisciplinary, interprofessional treatment concept. One component of this concept is preoperative preparation of the patient (“prehabilitation”), which is best initiated before hospital admission, e.g., correction of deficiency states, optimization of chronic drug treatment, and respiratory training. Another important component consists of pre-, intra-, and postoperative measures to prevent delirium, which can lower the frequency of this complication by 30–50%: these include orientation aids, avoidance of inappropriate drugs for elderly patients, adequate analgesia, early mobilization, short fasting times, and a perioperative nutrition plan. Preexisting cognitive impairment predisposes to postoperative delirium (odds ratios [OR] ranging from 2.5 to 4.5). Frailty is the most important predictor of the postoperative course (OR: 2.6–11). It follows that preoperative assessment of the patient’s functional and cognitive status is essential.
Conclusion: The evidence-based and guideline-consistent care of elderly patients requires not only close interdisciplinary, interprofessional, and cross-sectoral collaboration, but also the restructuring and optimization of habitual procedural pathways in the hospital. Elderly patients’ special needs can only be met by a treatment concept in which the entire perioperative phase is considered as a single, coherent process.
The demographic trend in Germany means that an increasing number of elderly patients will undergo surgical procedures. More than 7 million inpatients aged 65 years or older underwent surgery in 2017 (e1). There is no standard definition for the age beyond which an individual is “old.” In medicine, one often refers to individuals aged 65–75 years as the “young elderly” and 75–85 years as the “old elderly.” Those aged over 85 years are occasionally referred to as “the aged” or “super-elderly.”
With advancing age, risks that can have an adverse effect on the postoperative outcome in this patient group accumulate. A good postoperative outcome is defined not only by surgical success, but far more so by the preservation of performance, functionality, autonomy, and quality of life. Avoiding postoperative delirium (POD) is an important treatment goal. POD has serious sequelae for the patient‘s future life, including a loss of quality of life and independence, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. As a result, this frequent complication (incidence among patients ≥ 70 years: 30%–50%) has dramatic social, health-related, and socioeconomic consequences (1, e2–e4).
The evidence for the following recommendations on the perioperative care of older patients is primarily based on current guidelines, as well as on randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, and systematic review articles (eTable). A search was carried out in PubMed, the guideline database of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF), and the Cochrane database.
The importance of primary care physicians
Elderly patients benefit from a good preclinical work-up for their pending surgery. Optimally, this is initiated by the primary care physician and includes, e.g., compensating nutritional deficits, treatment of anemia, or optimizing long-term medication (Box). By using the national medication plan, it is possible to avoid loss of information when switching medication from the outpatient to the inpatient sector. The primary care physician‘s knowledge of often pre-existing multimorbidity enables the potential specific benefits of surgical treatment to be weighed up against its disadvantages in advance and together with the patient. Moreover, the primary care physician‘s assessment of which drugs might need to be discontinued perioperatively or modified in terms of dose or the time at which they are taken is important.
The aim of the preoperative work-up in elderly patients is to reliably identify common risk constellations in old age (Table 1) and reduce the likelihood of postoperative complications by means of preventive measures.
Risk: frailty and poor functional status
Frailty in elderly patients represents the most important predictor of the postoperative course (odds ratios [OR]: 2.6–11) (2, 3, e5–e11). Frailty is associated with the concomitant onset of a number of age-related functional impairments that make older patients more susceptible to postoperative complications (e12). A preoperative assessment should be performed to determine functional status (4, 5). In the case of high-risk patients, multimodal prehabilitation with physical training and oral nutritional supplements should be considered (6–8). Prehabilitation programs are currently being evaluated (e13). Calling in a geriatric specialist permits not only a more extensive assessment, but also enables prehabilitation measures to be carried out in a geriatric treatment unit.
Risk: chronic disorders and comorbidity
The prevalence of in particular cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, as well as metabolic and cerebral diseases is higher in old age (9, e14–e16). A guideline-compliant preoperative evaluation is able to identify these disorders, which can be further investigated by means of additional diagnostic methods (10).
Risk: pre-existing cognitive impairment
Pre-existing cognitive impairment is an important predictive factor for the development of POD (OR: 2.5; 95% confidence interval: [1.5; 4.2], OR: 4.5 [1.9; 13], OR: 4.3 [2.2; 8.5]) (11, e17, e18). Therefore, the elderly patient‘s preoperative baseline cognitive status is of particular importance. Since only around 50% of dementia patients are ever medically diagnosed as such (e19), one can assume that the real number of cases is higher. Therefore, a preoperative evaluation of cognitive function is essential (5, 12, e20). DemTect (dementia detection) and Mini-Cog (short cognitive test) are suitable instruments to this end (13, e21). There is also the IQ-CODE (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly), which is an assessment questionnaire that can be completed by relatives or carers.
Risk: osteoporosis and fall risk
Falls are a significant health risk in old age. Approximately 35% of 65- to 90-year-olds fall once a year and 10% more than once a year (e22). Falls result in fractures and fear of falling, as well as loss of quality of life and independence. The risk of falling increases in high-risk patients following surgery, e.g., due to frailty, reduced muscle strength, and reduced mobility. A risk assessment should be carried out preoperatively. Individual or group preventive exercise programs aimed at functional improvement as part of prehabilitation can also effectively reduce fall risk (14, e23). This needs to be flanked perioperatively by guideline-compliant diagnosis and treatment of concomitant osteoporosis, particularly following a fracture (15).
Malnutrition is a frequent problem often overlooked in the surgical field. Its prevalence among elderly patients is between 45% and 55% (e24, e25). Malnutrition is an unfavorable prognostic factor for the perioperative course and associated with an increased rate of complications and delirium (e26). Therefore, elderly patients should be examined preoperatively for malnutrition (5). The MNA-SF (Mini Nutritional Assessment) or the NRS2000 (Nutritional Risk Screening) are suitable tools to this end (16, e27). In line with the guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin, DG), malnourished patients in particular should be encouraged to use oral nutritional supplements (17, 18).
Polypharmacy is a relevant risk factor in elderly patients and associated with a poor postoperative outcome (e28, e29). Non-essential drugs, including non-prescription preparations, should be discontinued during the perioperative phase. A critical evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) in the elderly, e.g., using the PRISCUS list, is most particularly recommended in the perioperative phase (5, 19, 20–22). In general, long-term cardiac medications should be continued in order to avoid rebound phenomena (e.g., tachycardia upon discontinuation of β-receptor blockers) (e30). The same applies to pain medication: preoperatively administered opioids should also be continued in the perioperative setting.
Between 33%–43% of all elderly patients use long-term anticoagulants (e31). The use of anticoagulants in the elderly is essentially the same as in younger patients; however, the reduced renal function frequently seen in old age needs to be borne in mind. Important parameters for the perioperative use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC, non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants) include kidney and liver function, co-medication, the time at which the drug was last used, the size and urgency of the procedure, as well as the risk of intraoperative bleeding (e.g., HAS-BLED score >3) (23, e32, e33). In the majority of cases, perioperative bridging anticoagulation is no longer recommended when using NOAC and vitamin-K-antagonists (24, e34). This recommendation does not apply to patients at high risk for thromboembolism (e.g., due to mechanical heart valve replacement, coagulation disorders, CHA2DS2-VASC score >5) (25).
Perioperative pain concept
A detailed pain history should be taken preoperatively. Presenting the patient with the pain scale to be used postoperatively (e.g., the numerical rating scale [NRS]) as early on as in the preoperative setting, as well as discussing in detail the likely postoperative analgesic concept and the use of analgesics preoperatively, is recommended.
Opioids, if unavoidable, should be administered at a reduced initial dose according to the WHO analgesic ladder. Although they have a largely non-toxic effect on organs and are effective in the elderly, they do have disadvantages in older patients, i.e., exacerbated and hazardous side effects (e.g., development of delirium, increased fall risk) and can interact with other drugs metabolized via cytochrome P450. If possible, a non-opioid should be additionally administered in order to avoid or reduce the use of opioids. The selection of a non-opioid should be made on the basis of pre-existing disorders, with paracetamol and metamizole having the more favorable benefit–risk profile in the elderly (e35) (e35).
The time immediately prior to surgery, the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the surgical procedure, and the early postoperative phase are all important determinants of the postoperative course. Designing a procedure that promotes the patient‘s well-being and sense of orientation in the operating room represents an evidence-based, medically indicated measure for the prevention of delirium (12, 26, 27).
Dehydration is less well-tolerated in advancing age. Excessive preoperative fasting increases discomfort and agitation and promotes the onset of POD (28). A fasting period of 6 h is adequate in terms of the prevention of aspiration (29). Clear fluids should not be avoided for longer than 2 h preoperatively, since these are not associated with an increased risk of aspiration or other complications (30). The preoperative consumption of carbohydrate-containing drinks up to 2 h prior to surgery is beneficial and, as a form of non-drug-based anxiolysis, has a positive effect on the well-being of the patient (31).
The altered pharmacokinetics and dynamics seen in old age also affect anesthesia. Sedated older patients should always undergo neuromonitoring, since excessively deep anesthesia increases the risk for postoperative cognitive deficits and delirium (12). If muscle relaxants are to be used, short-acting substances should be selected where possible; metabolism that is independent of liver and kidney function is beneficial (e.g., cis-atracurium). Relaxometry should be performed concomitantly.
The duration of benzodiazepine action increases in a strongly age-dependent manner; furthermore, these substances are associated with the development of POD (32). Therefore, benzodiazepines should be used with the utmost restraint in elderly patients. In the case of active benzodiazepine abuse, which applies to no small number of elderly patients (prevalence of around 1.2 million) (e36), abrupt discontinuation in the perioperative phase is naturally not recommended.
Opioids as well as postoperative pain increase the risk of POD (opioids: OR: 2.5 [1.2; 5.2], pain: OR: 3.7 [1.5; 8.9]) (32, e37). Therefore, adequate opioid-reduced analgesia is of great importance. Regional anesthesia techniques are recommended if the intervention and the condition of the patient permit. The patient‘s sensory orientation (hearing and visual aids), direct verbal communication, and non-pharmacological sedation also play an important role in the operating room in terms of delirium prevention.
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
There are no significant differences between perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in the elderly and that in younger patients, either in terms of indication or performance. Particularly due to frequent polypharmacy, antibiotics that have a low interaction potential and which are well-tolerated are to be preferred. Beta-lactam antibiotics, in particular group 1 and 2 cephalosporins, are preferable. Elderly patients have an increased risk for multi-resistant pathogens (MRP), due to repeated hospital stays or antibiotic treatment in the preceding 3 months. In the case of confirmed MRP colonization, an adjustment of PAP should be considered depending on the individual case; however, this is generally not necessary. It may be beneficial if the resistant pathogen is found in the operating area, e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization of the skin. An attempt at preoperative decolonization is helpful in such cases. This applies all the more so if cardiac, neurosurgical, vascular, or orthopedic interventions are planned (e38).
Particularly in the case of elderly patients, the surgical indication should not be made solely on the basis of the question “What is surgically and technically feasible?,” but much more so on the question of “What makes sense?” (33). One should take into account here that the immediate complication and mortality rates in the early postoperative course, as well as the 1-year mortality rate following visceral surgery, are higher among patients above the age of 80 years compared to younger patients (1-year mortality: between 4.8% and 32%, depending on the type of intervention) (34, 35, e39). Therefore, the question arises as to whether a surgical approach is in actual fact associated with a better outcome for the patient compared to conservative treatment.
The adherence in trauma surgery to implementing postoperatively desired partial weight-bearing should be critically assessed preoperatively. In the case of restricted adherence, greater importance should be attributed to restoring immediate full weight-bearing than to achieving unrestricted limb mobility in the further course. The aim is to achieve definitive treatment with one single surgical procedure (e40).
Last but not least, since soft tissue management also poses a challenge, minimally invasive procedures should be considered. Ideally, individual parameters are assessed at an interdisciplinary level and across all professional groups, thereby preventing a complication-prone, one-dimensional decision-making process based on the surgical diagnosis.
Delirium screening and nursing aspects
As part of the identification of delirium, it is important to recognize early changes in the patient‘s awareness in order to initiate further measures. The nursing staff plays a crucial role here. Therefore, it is essential that carers are aware of the risk factors for POD and are trained in the implementation of preventive measures.
There are a number of validated assessment instruments for delirium screening in intensive care units and recovery rooms that have already been tried and tested in clinical routine, e.g.:
- CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit)
- ICDSC (Intensive Care Screening Checklist).
- DOS (Delirium Observation Screening Scale)
- Nu-Desc (Nursing Delirium Screening Scale)
- Four-Item Assessment Test (4AT).
Delirium screening should begin in the early postoperative phase and continue up to the fifth postoperative day (12).
Age-appropriate care in inpatient routine
Delirium prevention is of the utmost importance in the nursing care of elderly hospital patients. It has been shown that the risk of delirium can be reduced by 30%–50% as a result of preventive measures alone (1, 36, e41, e46–e48). Non-pharmacological interventions focus, for instance, on the following areas (37):
- Stimulation and communication
- Regulating the sleep–wake rhythm
- Involving relatives and persons of trust.
Fall prevention measures, as well as monitoring and checking actual food intake by means of dietary and fluid logs, are just as important in elderly patients as adequate pain management (e37).
Postoperative resumption of normal diet
It is generally not necessary to interrupt food intake in the postoperative phase (38). An early normal oral or enteral diet reduces the risk of infection and has a positive impact on the length of hospital stay. Since elderly patients in particular often have reduced sensations of hunger and thirst, they should be encouraged to drink sufficient quantities. The daily fluid intake of all elderly patients should be known and documented in order to promptly counteract dehydration (17, 38). Patients at high nutritional risk (body mass index <22 kg/m2) in whom adequate oral food intake cannot be achieved even with nursing support should receive prompt enteral supplements, combined with parenteral supplements where necessary (17, 18, 38, 39).
More attention should be paid to the above-mentioned aspects as part of discharge management in order to plan optimal post-inpatient care for the patient together with their primary care physician. Early rehabilitation under specialist geriatric care and aimed at restoring the patient‘s ability for self-help, as well as functional autonomy in everyday life, should be planned in good time if required.
Good perioperative care of elderly patients can only be achieved if there is an interdisciplinary consensus on treatment planning and goal setting. In terms of the treatment goal, preserving the functional status of the patient should be given equal priority to treating the underlying disease. The cornerstones of this include the identification of individual age-specific risk factors and the prompt initiation of appropriate preventive measures. The preoperative work-up (whether in the in- or outpatient setting), surgical and anesthesia planning, the postoperative inpatient phase, as well as transfer to further outpatient care should be structured with these aspects in mind (Table 2, Figure). To this end, an interdisciplinary and cross-professional concept for the perioperative care of elderly patients needs to be developed. Improved collaboration between the in- and outpatient sectors is essential here, because only when all treating physicians and therapists know and implement this concept can the optimal benefit be conferred to the patient.
Conflict of interests
Prof. Weimann received lecture fees as well as travel cost reimbursement from Baxter, Berlin Chemie, B. Braun/Melsungen, Ethicon, Fresenius, Kabi, Lilly, Medtronic, Nestlé, and Nutricia. He received trial support (third-party funding) from Baxter.
The remaining authors state that they have no conflicts of interest
Manuscript submitted on 21 August 2018, revised version accepted on
18 December 2018.
Translated from the original German by Christine Schaefer-Tsorpatzidis.
Dr. med. Cynthia Olotu
Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie
Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
For eReferences please refer to:
Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig: Prof. Dr. med. Arved Weimann
Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Hospital, Tübingen: Prof. Dr. med. Christian Bahrs
Department of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH,
Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Schwenk
Department of General Practice / Primary Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE): Prof. Dr. med. Martin Scherer
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rotkreuzklinikum München:
Prof. Dr. med. Rainer Kiefmann
An interdisciplinary and interprofessional alliance was formed on the initiative of the German committee on geriatric anesthesia of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, DGAI). An expert consensus on the essential principles of the perioperative care of the elderly patient was met in collaboration with the appointed representatives of the German societies for general and family medicine, general and visceral surgery, nutritional medicine, geriatrics, trauma surgery, as well as specialist nursing and other healthcare professions. The following colleagues made a crucial contribution to the manuscript: Prof. Dr. Berthold Bein (DGAI), Dr. Simone Gurlit (DGAI), Prof. Dr. Hans Jürgen Heppner (DGG), Dr. Stephanie Schibur (GDU), Inke Zastrow, Prof. Dr. Ulrich Liener (DGU), Prof. Dr. Esther Pogatzki-Zahn (DGAI), Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Koppert (DGAI), Dr. Beatrice Grabein, and Henning Bolle (DGF). Our heartfelt thanks also go to Prof. Dr. A. E. Goetz and Dr. A.-K. Riegel for their supervision and critical review of the manuscript, as well as to the Johanna und Fritz Buch Gedächtnis-Stiftung
|1.||Siddiqi N, Harrison JK, Clegg A, et al.: Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients. Coch Data Syst Rev 2016; 3: Cd005563 CrossRef|
|2.||Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE: Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics 2016; 16: 157 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|3.||Watt J, Tricco AC, Talbot-Hamon C, et al.: Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2018; 16: 2 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|4.||Birkelbach O, Morgeli R, Balzer F, et al.: [Why and How Should I Assess Frailty? A guide for the preoperative anesthesia clinic]. AINS 2017; 52: 765–76 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|5.||De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, et al.: Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. EJA 2018; 35: 407–65 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|6.||Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Roca J, et al.: Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 50–6 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|7.||Valkenet K, van de Port IG, Dronkers JJ, de Vries WR, Lindeman E, Backx FJ: The effects of preoperative exercise therapy on postoperative outcome: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 99–111 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|8.||Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, et al.: Effects of nutritional prehabilitation, with and without exercise, on outcomes of patients who undergo colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 391–410.e4 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|9.||Statistisches Bundesamt (ed.): Gesundheit im Alter, 2012. www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Gesundheit/Gesundheitszustand/GesundheitimAlter0120006109004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (last accessed on 8 January 2019).|
|10.||Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin (DGIM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie (DGCH), Zwissler B: Präoperative Evaluation erwachsener Patienten vor elektiven, nicht herz-thoraxchirurgischen Eingriffen. Gemeinsame Empfehlung der DGAI, DGCH und DGIM. Anästh Intensivmed 2017; 58: 349–64.|
|11.||Sprung J, Roberts RO, Weingarten TN, et al.: Postoperative delirium in elderly patients is associated with subsequent cognitive impairment. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119: 316–23 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|12.||Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, et al.: European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. EJA 2017; 34: 192–214 CrossRefMEDLINE|
|13.||Kalbe E, Kessler J, Calabrese P, et al.: DemTect: a new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19: 136–43 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|14.||Kwan E, Straus SE: Assessment and management of falls in older people. CMAJ 2014; 186: E610–21 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|15.||Osteologie D: Leitlinie Osteoporose. www.dv-osteologie.org/uploads/Leitlinie%202017/Finale%20Version%20Leitlinie%20Osteoporose%202017_end.pdf (last accessed on 8 January 2019).|
|16.||Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al.: Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 2009; 13: 782–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|17.||Volkert DBJ, Frühwald T, Gehrke I, et al., and the DGEM Steering Committee: Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin (DGEM) in Zusammenarbeit mit der GESKES, der AKE und der DGG: Klinische Ernährung in der Geriatrie. Aktuel Ernahrungsmed 2013; 38: e1–e48 CrossRef|
|18.||Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T, et al.: ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2018; 1–38 MEDLINE|
|19.||Holt S, Schmiedl S, Thurmann PA: Potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly: the PRISCUS list. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107: 543–51 CrossRef|
|20.||American Geriatrics Society: Updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63: 2227–46 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|21.||Mohanty S, Rosenthal RA, Russell MM, et al.: Optimal perioperative management of the geriatric patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2016 ; 222: 930–47 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|22.||Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF: Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 453–66 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|23.||Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY: A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093–100 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|24.||Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Kaatz S, et al.: Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 823–33 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|25.||Denkinger MK, Grünewald M, Kiefmann R: Antikoagulation bei alterstraumatologischen Patienten. In: Liener UC, Becker C, Rapp K (eds.): Weissbuch Alterstraumatologie: Antikoagulation und Thromboseprophylaxe. OUP. 1th edition. Stuttgart: Dienst am Buch Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH 2018; 34–39.|
|26.||Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Peri-operative care of the elderly 2014. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 81–98 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|27.||Mohanty S, Rosenthal R, Russell M, Neuman M, Ko C, Esnaola N: Optimal perioperative management of the geriatric patient: a best practices guideline. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222: 930–47 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|28.||Radtke FM, Franck M, MacGuill M, et al.: Duration of fluid fasting and choice of analgesic are modifiable factors for early postoperative delirium. EJA 2010; 27: 411–6 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|29.||Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin e. V. und Berufsverband Deutscher Anästhesisten e. V.: Entschließungen, Empfehlungen, Vereinbarungen. Ebelsbach: Aktiv Druck & Verlag GmbH 2011.|
|30.||Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop M, Nygren J: Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Coch Data Syst Rev 2014: CD009161.|
|31.||Amer MA, Smith MD, Herbison GP, Plank LD, McCall JL: Network meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative carbohydrate loading on recovery after elective surgery. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 187–97 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|32.||Clegg A, Young JB: Which medications to avoid in people at risk of delirium: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 23–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|33.||Loh A, Simon D, Kriston L, Härter M: [Shared decision making in medicine.] Dtsch Arztebl Int 2007; 104(21): A 1483–8 VOLLTEXT|
|34.||McIsaac DI, Bryson GL, van Walraven C: Association of frailty and 1-year postoperative mortality following major elective noncardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Surgery 2016; 151: 538–45 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|35.||Schuld J, Glanemann M: Chirurgische Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms im Alter. Chirurg 2017; 88: 123–30 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|36.||Chen CC, Li HC, Liang JT, et al.: Effect of a modified hospital elder life program on delirium and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surgery 2017; 152: 827–34 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|37.||National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg103 (last accessed on 8 January 2019).|
|38.||Weimann A, Breitenstein S, Breuer JP, et al., and the DGEM Steering Committee: S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin (DGEM) in Zusammenarbeit mit der GESKES, der AKE, der DGCH, der DGAI und der DGAV: Klinische Ernährung in der Chirurgie. Aktuel Ernahrungsmed 2013; 38: e155–e197 CrossRef|
|39.||Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al.: ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2017; 36: 623–50 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e1.||Statistisches Bundesamt: Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik). Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt 2017.|
|e2.||Fong TG, Tulebaev SR, Inouye SK: Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5: 210–20 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e3.||Anastasiadis K, Argiriadou H, Kosmidis MH, et al.: Neurocognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a randomised controlled pilot study. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2011; 97: 1082–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e4.||Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC: Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 1578–89 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e5.||Neuman HB, Weiss JM, Leverson G, et al.: Predictors of short-term postoperative survival after elective colectomy in colon cancer patients >/= 80 years of age. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 1427–35 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e6.||Covinsky KE, Justice AC, Rosenthal GE, Palmer RM, Landefeld CS: Measuring prognosis and case mix in hospitalized elders. The importance of functional status. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 203–8 CrossRef CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e7.||Davis RB, Iezzoni LI, Phillips RS, Reiley P, Coffman GA, Safran C: Predicting in-hospital mortality. The importance of functional status information. Med Care 1995; 33: 906–21 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e8.||Buigues C, Juarros-Folgado P, Fernandez-Garrido J, Navarro-Martinez R, Cauli O: Frailty syndrome and pre-operative risk evaluation: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2015; 61: 309–21 CrossRef PubMed Central|
|e9.||Shem Tov L, Matot I: Frailty and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30: 409–17 MEDLINE|
|e10.||Schmidt M, Eckardt R, Altmeppen S, Wernecke KD, Spies C: Functional impairment prior to major non-cardiac surgery is associated with mortality within one year in elderly patients with gastrointestinal, gynaecological and urogenital cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9: 53–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e11.||Oakland K, Nadler R, Cresswell L, Jackson D, Coughlin PA: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between frailty and outcome in surgical patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98: 80–5 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e12.||Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, et al.: Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17: 1163.e1–.e17.|
|e13.||McIsaac DI, Saunders C, Hladkowicz E, et al.: PREHAB study: a protocol for a prospective randomised clinical trial of exercise therapy for people living with frailty having cancer surgery. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e022057 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e14.||Steppuhn H KR, Scheidt-Nave C 12-Monats-Prävalenz der bekannten chronisch obstruktiven Lungenerkrankung (COPD) in Deutschland. Journal of Health Monitoring 2017; 2: 46–54.|
|e15.||Heidemann C, Kuhnert R, Born S et al.: 12-Monats-Prävalenz des bekannten Diabetes mellitus in Deutschland. Journal of Health Monitoring 2017; 2: 48–56.|
|e16.||Busch MA, Schienkiewitz A, Nowossadeck E, Gosswald A: [Prevalence of stroke in adults aged 40 to 79 years in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz ) 2013; 56: 656–60 MEDLINE|
|e17.||Fong TG, Davis D, Growdon ME, Albuquerque A, Inouye SK: The interface between delirium and dementia in elderly adults. Lancet Neurology 2015; 14: 823–32 CrossRef|
|e18.||Ahmed S, Leurent B, Sampson EL: Risk factors for incident delirium among older people in acute hospital medical units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 326–33 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e19.||Engels D, Pfeuffer F, Heusinger J, et al.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung in stationären Einrichtungen (MuG IV) – Demenz, Angehörige und Freiwillige, Versorgungssituation sowie Beispielen für „Good Practice“. In: Bundesministerium für Familie, Frauen und Jugend, (ed.): Integrierter Abschlussbericht 2007. www.bmfsfj.de/blob/78928/9465bec83edaf4027f25bb5433ea702e/abschlussbericht-mug4-data.pdf (last accessed on 15 January 2019).|
|e20.||von Renteln-Kruse W, Neumann L, Klugmann B, et al.: Geriatric patients with cognitive impairment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 103–12 CrossRef|
|e21.||Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A: The mini-cog: a cognitive ‚vital signs‘ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15: 1021–7 CrossRef|
|e22.||Klenk J, Kerse N, Rapp K, et al.: Physical activity and different concepts of fall Rrisk estimation in older people—results of the ActiFE-Ulm study. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0129098.|
|e23.||Siegrist M, Freiberger E, Geilhof B, et al.: Fall prevention in a primary care setting. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 365–72 VOLLTEXT|
|e24.||Konturek PC, Herrmann HJ, Schink K, Neurath MF, Zopf Y: Malnutrition in hospitals: it was, is now, and must not remain a problem! Sci Monit 2015; 21: 2969–75 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e25.||Pirlich M, Schutz T, Norman K, et al.: The German hospital malnutrition study. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2006; 25: 563–72 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e26.||Phillips P: Grip strength, mental performance and nutritional status as indicators of mortality risk among female geriatric patients. Age Ageing 1986; 15: 53–6 CrossRef|
|e27.||Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z: Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2003; 22: 321–36 CrossRef|
|e28.||Harstedt M, Rogmark C, Sutton R, Melander O, Fedorowski A: Polypharmacy and adverse outcomes after hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Surg Res 2016; 11: 151 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e29.||Kennedy JM, van Rij AM, Spears GF, Pettigrew RA, Tucker IG: Polypharmacy in a general surgical unit and consequences of drug withdrawal. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 353–62 MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e30.||Barnett SR: Polypharmacy and perioperative medications in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin 2009; 27: 377–89 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e31.||Madsen CM, Jantzen C, Lauritzen JB, Abrahamsen B, Jorgensen HL: Temporal trends in the use of antithrombotics at admission. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 368–73 MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e32.||Oprea AD, Noto CJ, Halaszynski TM: Risk stratification, perioperative and periprocedural management of the patient receiving anticoagulant therapy. J Clin Anesth 2016; 34: 586–99 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e33.||Lip GY, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA: Comparative validation of a novel risk score for predicting bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 173–80 MEDLINE|
|e34.||Douketis JD, Healey JS, Brueckmann M, et al.: Perioperative bridging anticoagulation during dabigatran or warfarin interruption among patients who had an elective surgery or procedure. Substudy of the RE-LY trial. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113: 625–32 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e35.||Meyer-Frießem C, Pogatzki-Zahn E: Postoperative Schmerztherapie. In: Wilhelm W (ed.): Praxis der Anästhesiologie: konkret – kompakt – leitlinienorientiert. Berlin: Springer 2018 CrossRef|
|e36.||Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen e. V.: DHS Jahrbuch Sucht. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers 2018.|
|e37.||Vaurio LE, Sands LP, Wang Y, Mullen EA, Leung JM: Postoperative delirium: the importance of pain and pain management. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1267–73 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e38.||Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN): A national clinical guideline 2008, updated 2014. www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign104.pdf (last accessed on 8 January 2019).|
|e39.||Olufajo OA, Reznor G, Lipsitz SR, et al.: Preoperative assessment of surgical risk: creation of a scoring tool to estimate 1-year mortality after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly patient. Am J Surg 2017; 213: 771–7.e1.|
|e40.||Werther SFJ, Mayr E: Interdisziplinäres Management im Zentrum für geriatrische Traumatologie. Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2014; 9: 387–406 CrossRef|
|e41.||Boettger S, Nunez DG, Meyer R, et al.: Delirium in the intensive care setting: A reevaluation of the validity of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC versus the DSM-IV-TR in determining a diagnosis of delirium as part of the daily clinical routine. Palliat Support Care 2017: 1–9.|
|e42.||Gavinski K, Carnahan R, Weckmann M: Validation of the delirium observation screening scale in a hospitalized older population. J Hosp Med 2016; 11: 494–7 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e43.||Hargrave A, Bastiaens J, Bourgeois JA, et al.: Validation of a nurse-based delirium-screening tool for hospitalized patients. Psychosomatics 2017; 58: 594–603..|
|e44.||Adamis D, Sharma N, Whelan PJ, Macdonald AJ: Delirium scales: a review of current evidence. Aging Ment Health 2010; 14: 543–55 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e45.||Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, Straus SE: Does this patient have delirium? Value of bedside instruments. JAMA 2010; 304: 779–86 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e46.||Faught DD: Delirium: The nurse‘s role in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Medsurg Nurs 2014; 23: 301–5 MEDLINE|
|e47.||Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM: Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 516–22 CrossRef|
|e48.||Kratz T, Heinrich M, Schlauss E, Diefenbacher A: Preventing postoperative delirium. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 289–96 VOLLTEXT|
|e49.||Olotu C: Anästhesiologische Behandlungspfade für ältere Patienten. In: Eckart J, Jaeger K, Möllhof T (eds.): Kompendium Anästhesiologie. Landsberg am Lech: Ecomed-Storck 2018; 60.Erg.-Lfg. 11/18 1–14.|