The Interdisciplinary Management of Foot Drop
; ; ; ; ;
Background: Foot drop can be caused by a variety of diseases and injuries. Although it is a common condition, its overall incidence has not been reported to date. Foot drop markedly restricts the everyday activities of persons suffering from it. There is, therefore, a need for an optimized strategy for its diagnosis and treatment that would be standardized across the medical specialties encountering patients with this problem.
Methods: This article consists of a review on the basis of pertinent publications retrieved by a search in the Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, as well as a description of the authors’ proposed strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of foot drop.
Results: Foot drop can be due to a disturbance at any central or peripheral location along the motor neural pathway that terminates in the dorsiflexor muscles of the foot, or at multiple locations in series. Optimal localization of the lesion(s) is a prerequisite for appropriate treatment and a successful outcome. The most common causes are L5 radiculopathy and peroneal nerve injury. An operation by a neurosurgeon or spinal surgeon is a reasonable option whenever there is a realistic chance that the nerve will recover. In our opinion, any patient with a subjectively disturbing foot drop and a clinically suspected compressive neuropathy of the peroneal nerve should be informed about the option of surgical decompression of the nerve at the fibular head, which can be performed with little risk. In case of a permanent foot drop, some patients can benefit from muscle-transfer surgery. For spastic foot drop, the option of botulinum toxin injections should be evaluated.
Conclusion: The care of patients with foot drop could be optimized by interdisciplinary foot-drop clinics involving all of the relevant specialists. The goals of treatment should always be improved mobility in everyday life and the prevention of falls, pain, and abnormal postures.
Foot drop can be unilateral or bilateral. Starting from a muscle strength test result of less than 3/5, i.e. when the foot can no longer be actively lifted against gravity, an abnormal gait pattern arises which affects both the stance phase and swing phase (1). In order to prevent the forefoot from catching on the ground, patients with foot drop perform compensatory hyperflexion in the hip and knee joints and in addition internal rotation of the foot in the transverse plane. In the long term, this gait pattern results in improper loading of the entire skeletal axis (2). As the result of the muscular imbalance, which causes permanent strain of the plantar flexors and shortening of the Achilles tendon, equinus position of the foot may develop. The only available prospective multicenter study published by Aprile et al. in 2005 found that patients with foot drop had a reduced quality of life with significantly poorer scores in the physical and psychosocial domains. Of the assessed patients, 69% required mobility aids (3).
Until now, there is no specific code of the International Classification of Disease (ICD) for foot drop as a sign. For example, ICD G57.3 (Lesion of lateral popliteal nerve) only refers to peripheral lesions and excludes all more proximally located lesions. Other codes potentially cover foot drop, but only as an addition to other signs and symptoms (eTable 1). Solely based on experiences in everyday clinical practice, it can be assumed that foot drop is quite common. An overall incidence of foot drop has not been reported in the literature. Prospective randomized trial are scarce. Retrospective data only refer to a part of the possible conditions or treatment modalities.
Depending on the initial situation, primary and secondary diagnoses, patients with foot drop encounter various specialties in the hospital or community-based care setting. In our experience, patients are not treated based on common standards. Existing treatment options are not consistently offered. It is necessary to integrate patients with foot drop in a clearly defined diagnosis and treatment algorithm.
This review informs about various causes of foot drop and presents an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The review is based on a selective search in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, using the search terms “foot drop“, “dropfoot“, “gait disturbance“, “quality of life“, “peroneal nerve lesion“, “L5 nerve root“, “central causes of foot drop“, “tendon transfer“, and on the current guidelines on nerve injuries and lumbar disc herniation.
In principle, injury to the motor pathways of the muscles involved in dorsiflexion of the foot can occur on any level, from central to peripheral, or simultaneously at multiple levels (Figure 1, Table 1). It is important for the treatment and prognostic assessment of foot drop to narrow down the possible location of the damage as precisely as possible. In 1973, Upton and McComas postulated that a nerve with a proximal injury is more prone to develop a lesion along its further distal course (4). Until today, this double-crush theory is still favored by several authors (5). However, more important appears to be the experience from clinical practice that many patients have multiple conditions which may be competing or additive causes of foot drop.
The definition of “central” comprises the upper and lower motor neurons of the pyramidal tract in the brain and the spinal cord. Here, foot drop is frequently not an isolated finding, but part of a more extensive paresis pattern. The underlying pathologies can be characterized by displacement (for example, extra-axial tumors  or tumor edema) or a destructive nature (ischemia, hemorrhage, inflammations, invasive tumors).
Central causes of foot drop were mainly described in case reports or case series some of which are already older (6–8). Johnson et al. estimated in a preliminary study that 20% of patients with anterior cerebral artery infarct (superior margin of the brain) or lacunar infarcts in the area of the internal capsule or the cerebral peduncles develop foot drops (9). Jakubowitz et al. report in a systematic review that 14% of all stroke patients have a residual foot drop as a permanent complication (10). Spinal cord lesions from the cervical spine to the conus medullaris are frequently associated with foot drop, besides other pareses. Van der Salm et al. found in a retrospective study on patients with incomplete spinal cord injury foot drop (plantar flexion included) in 76% of cases (11). Jellema et al. reported in a review that 78 to 100% of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas had a paresis of the lower limbs with gait abnormality at the time of diagnosis (12). Tokuhashi et al. report in a retrospective study that the majority of patients with disc herniation at the thoracolumbar junction had a paresis, especially the group with disc herniation at the T12–L1 level and bilateral or unilateral foot drop (13).
Cause at the spinal nerves
In the literature, the reported incidence rates for discogenic foot drop vary (14, 15). In a recent retrospective study from 2018, Ma et al. found that 23% of patients with disc herniation affecting the L5 nerve root had foot drop; here, the term “foot drop“ was only used for muscle strength results below 4/5 (movement possible against some resistance, but not full strength). Risk factors for the development of paresis included concomitant polyneuropathy, extensive recessal or foraminal disc herniation, calcified disc herniation, and canal occupancy rates greater than 50% (15). Suzuki et al. conclude that noncontained sequestered disc herniations significant more frequently result in foot drop compared to subligamentous sequestered discs (16).
Peripheral causes—lumbosacral plexus, sciatic nerve, peroneal nerves
Injury to peripheral nerves may occur at any point in their course (Figure 1). Damage to the peroneal nerve is the most common cause of foot drop (3, 17). Additionally, peroneal nerve injury accounts for 15% of all mononeuropathies in adults (18, 19).
External and internal factors can cause peroneal nerve dysfunction. Mild pressure on the region of the fibular head, for example by placing the lower leg on it, is sufficient to induce a conduction block of the nerve. Space occupying lesions within or adjacent to the peroneal nerve are usually ganglion cysts, originating from the knee joint or the tibiofibular joint (20). An analysis of the trauma registry data of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) performed in 2018 showed that 1.8% of patients with lower extremity injury suffer concomitant nerve damage, and the peroneal nerve is with 56% the most commonly damaged nerve (21).
Another cause is iatrogenic injury, typically sustained during osteosynthetic or arthroscopic surgery. Kretschmer et al. showed in a large, retrospectively analyzed sample of trauma surgery patients that iatrogenic nerve injuries accounted for 17.4% of cases (22). Besides the accessory nerve, the peroneal nerve was the most commonly injured nerve.
Metabolic disease as well as neurodegenerative, neuromuscular and inflammatory processes can also cause foot drop (Table 1).
It is not always easy to clearly determine the cause of a sudden-onset foot drop. The main challenge is to differentiate between radiculopathy and peripheral nerve injury or a neurological systemic disease.
Table 2 shows the association of individual muscles and their innervation. Knowledge of the sensory loss area as well as clinical signs and provocation tests can aid the diagnosis (eBox 1).
Electrophysiological measurement is an established and sensitive method (23, 24) which can differentiate between a lesion of the long tracts, a radiculopathy and a peripheral nerve injury. Information about the location and severity/type of nerve lesion can be obtained (eBox 2).
Obtaining imaging studies is a standard diagnostic procedure, especially for the diagnosis of cerebral and spinal causes of foot drop (Figure 3). In the diagnosis of peripheral nerve abnormalities, they provide information about the exact location and morphology of a lesion. Besides magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR neurography, nerve ultrasound is available as a non-invasive and cost-efficient method. A retrospective study found a significant correlation between electrophysiologically detectable axonal damage and nerve changes visualized using ultrasound. However, no such correlation was found for the electrophysiological nerve conduction block (25).
The available evidence with regard to treatment options is weak, in particular because foot drop as an autonomous condition independent of other diagnoses has so far received little attention in studies. One level IV study on the tendon replacement technique discussed below is available. By contrast, a 1b level of evidence is reached for the treatment with botulinum toxin due to the availability of prospective, randomized controlled trials on this subject (eTable 2).
In the treatment concept for the patient, the first step is to determine whether a surgical intervention offers a realistic chance of restoring nerve function. However, this requires that the etiology of the foot drop is completely understood. The problem is that restoration of the nerve structures is often no longer possible at the point in time when the etiology is known. Still, it is just as important to not deny patients with persistent foot drop access to supportive measures. When selecting these measures, differences in the original level of functioning, which do not necessarily correlate with the strength level of the paresis, and the patients’ expectations with regard to their everyday mobility should be taken into account.
Surgery for preservation and regeneration of nerve function
As a general rule, causal treatment should initially be attempted in every patient with foot drop. Here, the range of treatment options extends from cerebral or spinal tumor resection to sequestrectomy and neurolysis for disc herniation to the complete spectrum of peripheral nerve surgery. To what extent one of these options is practical and useful in an individual patient depends on the patient-perceived limitations, the location of the lesion and the duration and severity of the paresis.
Currently, clinical data defining a precise time frame for surgery are scarce. Studies investigating the timing of surgery are largely experimental and focus on molecular factors of nerve degeneration and nerve regeneration (eBox 3). Fundamentally, repair processes are possible in the peripheral nervous system. As long as the nerve-cell nucleus is intact, axonal sprouting occurs for up to six months after the injury. However, the capacity for regeneration already starts to decline after three months because of a variety of changes in the distal stump (26). In the central nervous system, neural regeneration is inhibited by the extracellular environment. Consequently, the damage is usually irreversible. Here, surgery can improve signs and symptoms if, for example, a space-occupying lesion acts on a neural structure by displacing or compressing it, instead of destroying it by infiltrative growth.
In the current DGN guideline on lumbar radiculopathy, a relative and absolute indication for surgery is described for muscle strengths of >3/5 and ≤ 3/5, respectively (27). Recovery is correlated with the severity of the paresis. There is no clear consensus to what extent the preoperative duration of the paresis correlates with recovery (28, 29). However, there is a trend to better recovery if the patient undergoes surgery within 48 hours of the onset of the paresis.
It has been observed that the peripheral peroneal nerve shows poorer regeneration compared to other nerves, both spontaneous and after surgery (30–32). If a common compression injury is suspected, a watch-and-wait strategy is justified; however, over the course of a week clear functional gains should be noted. Decompression of the peroneal nerve at the fibular head at least ensures that intrinsic compression is remedied. For the repair of the peroneal nerve, the principles of peripheral nerve surgery apply. Finally, it should be noted that the graft length, especially with this nerve, should not exceed 6 cm, because otherwise it will lead to significantly poorer outcomes (30, 31).
Tendon transfers to restore specific movements have been described since the end of the 19th century (33). In patients with irreversible loss of peroneal nerve function, the posterior tibial tendon is pulled through the interosseous membrane to the instep where it is anchored (Figure 4). In addition to the passive lifting achieved with this redirection, this procedure enables a certain degree of active control by the patients. One variation of this procedure is to attach the tibialis posterior tendon, which has been redirected to the front, with the tibialis anterior and the peroneal tendons to create a so-called stirrup. Even though the measured increase in foot lifting strength resulting from a tendon transfer is only about 30% of the full strength, a significant functional increase is achieved and the quality of life is satisfactorily improved (34, 35).
Functional electrical stimulation
Direct muscular stimulation appears to help prevent muscle atrophy in the denervated area and therefore is generally useful in patients with foot drop as long as reinnervation is still pursued. Su et al. have shown in a recent animal experimental study that the interval between the start of stimulation and the time of denervation plays a role and best outcomes are achieved with a delayed initiation of electrical stimulation in relation to the time the lesion occurred (36). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), however, targets sensory skin nerves and thus rather helps to alleviate pain than to promote muscle fiber growth. Implantable neurostimulation devices were only temporarily available on the market and have so far failed to gain general acceptance.
In patients with spastic foot drop, the option of treatment with botulinum toxin should be evaluated. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies showed that injections of type A botulinum toxin into the calf muscles resulted in an effective, dose-dependent reduction in ankle spasticity (37, 38). These studies also found a reduced use of aids with botulinum toxin treatment. The time of onset of spasticity was not recorded. Another limitation of the two studies is the one-time injection of botulinum toxin with a follow-up period of only the expected duration of action. Both studies did not record the time of onset of spasticity.
There is conflicting evidence from studies on the effect on gait parameters. In patients with severe spasticity, treatment with botulinum toxin can be combined with physiotherapeutic redressement procedures. This approach involves the application of plaster casts with weekly increased dorsal extension to overcome concomitant shortening of the Achilles tendon by continuous stretching. In addition, there is evidence indicating that the pain associated with spastic foot drop can be improved by botulinum toxin treatment. In 2014, botulinum toxin was approved for the treatment of the distal lower extremity in patients with stroke-related spasticity.
Ankle foot orthoses, so-called peroneus splints, are designed to improve everyday mobility in patients with irreversible foot drop. There are dynamic and stiff versions of these orthoses available (39). Disadvantages include weight and appearance of the orthoses as well as pressure points due to insufficient adaption to the foot and shoe shape. In addition, the use of orthoses does not lead to a normal gait pattern. Patients should be encouraged to at times abstain from the use of the orthosis in a barrier-free environment.
Independent of the surgical or conservative approach, every patient with foot drop should undergo targeted training. The therapeutic goals include (40):
- to reduce muscle fiber atrophy
- to preserve ankle mobility
- to promote reinnervation after nerve surgery
- to acquire central control after tendon transfer
- to improve gait steadiness in general.
Conclusion and outlook
Foot drop is an underestimated sign. The available evidence is weak and data are mainly obtained from retrospective studies. This is in stark contrast to the fact that foot drop is at least by some of the affected patients viewed as an impairment with relevant impact on everyday activities. A comprehensive search for the cause of the patient’s foot drop, including all possibilities of injury to the neuromuscular pathway, should be undertaken. There is a range of treatment options, some are causal and others symptomatic in nature. Typically, these treatments cannot be provided by one specialty alone.
In order to close information gaps and to simplify the logistic aspect of treatment for the patient, interdisciplinary outpatient clinics focusing on foot drop appear to be a practical strategy. Thus, close and regular cooperation between neurosurgeons, neurologists, specialist plastic and reconstructive surgeons or orthopedic and trauma surgeons with focus on foot surgery, as well as physiotherapists and orthopedic technicians is desirable.
The creation of a guideline of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) on the management of foot drop should be discussed. Likewise, it should be considered to create a registry supported by several centers to obtain data of good quality with regard to foot drop etiology, symptom severity and successful management.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Manuscript received on 18 October 2018; revised version accepted on 11 March 2019
Translated from the original German by Ralf Thoene, MD.
Dr. med. Anne Elisabeth Carolus
Klinik für Neurochirurgie
In der Schornau 23–25, 44892 Bochum, Germany
Cite this as:
Carolus AE, Becker M, Cuny J, Smektala R, Schmieder K, Brenke C:
The interdisciplinary management of foot drop.
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019; 116: 347–54. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0347
For eReferences please refer to:
Dr. med. Anne Carolus, Prof. Dr. med. Kirsten Schmieder, PD Dr. med. Christopher Brenke
Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Pauwelsklinik Aachen, Aachen, Germany:
PD Dr. med. Michael Becker
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany: Dr. med. Jeanne Cuny
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany: Prof. Dr. med. Rüdiger Smektala
|1.||Ewerbeck V, Wentzensen V, Holz F, Krämer KW, Pfeil J, Sabo D: Standardverfahren in der operativen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. 3rd edition, Thieme 2006 CrossRef|
|2.||Vlahovic TC, Ribeiro CE, Lamm BM, et al.: A case of peroneal neuropathy-induced footdrop. Correlated and compensatory lower-extremity function. Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000; 90: 411–20 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|3.||Aprile I, Caliandro P, La Torre G, et al.: Multicenter study of peroneal mononeuropathy: clinical, neurophysiologic, and quality of life assessment. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2005; 10: 259–68 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|4.||Upton AR, McComas AJ: The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 2: 359–62 CrossRef|
|5.||Matsumoto J, Isu T, Kim K, et al.: Impact of additional treatment of paralumbar spine and peripheral nerve diseases after lumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2018; 112: e778–82 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|6.||Baysefer A, Erdogan E, Sali A, Sirin S, Seber N: Foot drop following brain tumors: case reports. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1998; 41: 97–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|7.||Westhout FD, Paré LS, Linskey ME: Central causes of foot drop: rare and underappreciated differential diagnoses. J Spinal Cord Med 2007; 30: 62–6 CrossRef|
|8.||Eskandary H, Hamzei A, Yasamy MT: Foot drop following brain lesion. Surg Neurol 1995; 43: 89–90 CrossRef|
|9.||Johnson CA, Burridge JH, Strike PW, Wood DE, Swain ID: The effect of combined use of botulinum toxin type A and functional electric stimulation in the treatment of spastic drop foot after stroke: a preliminary investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 902–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|10.||Jakubowitz E, Jao D, Windhagen H, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Thomann A, Daniilidis K: Treatment options for neurogenic foot drop: a systematic literatur research. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 402–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|11.||van der Salm A, Nene AV, Maxwell DJ, Veltink PH, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ: Gait impairments in a group of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and their relevance regarding therapeutic approaches using functional electrical stimulation. Artif Organs 2005; 29: 8–14 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|12.||Jellema K, Canta LR, Tijssen CC, van Rooij WJ, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical features in 80 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 1438–40 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|13.||Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Uematsu Y, Oda H: Symptoms of thoracolumbar junction disc herniation. Spine 2001; 26: E512–8 CrossRef|
|14.||Jönsson B, Strömqvist B: Motor affliction of the L5 nerve root in lumbar nerve root compression syndromes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 2012–5 CrossRef|
|15.||Ma J, He Y, Wang A, et al.: Risk factors analysis for foot drop associated with lumbar disc herniation: an analysis of 236 patients. World Neurosurg 2018; 110: e1017–24 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|16.||Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Konishi S, et al.: Risk factor analysis for motor deficit and delayed recovery associated with L4/5 lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24: 1–5 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|17.||Stewart JD: Foot drop: where, why and what to do? Pract Neurol 2008; 8: 158–69 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|18.||Fabre T, Piton C, Andre D, Lasseur E, Durandeau A: Peroneal nerve entrapment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 47–53 CrossRef|
|19.||Katirji MB, Wilbourn AJ: Common peroneal neuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiologic study of 116 lesions. Neurology 1988; 38: 1723–8 CrossRef|
|20.||Desy NM, Wang H, Elshiekh MAI, et al.: Intraneural ganglion cysts: a systematic review and reinterpretation of the world’s literature. J Neurosurg 2016; 125: 615–63 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|21.||Huckhagel T, Nüchtern J, Regelsberger J, Gelderblom M, Lefering R; TraumaRegister DGU: Nerve trauma of the lower extremity: evaluation of 60,422 leg injured patients from the TraumaRegister DGU between 2002 and 2015. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2018; 26: 40 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|22.||Kretschmer T, Antoniadis G, Braun V, Rath SA, Richter HP: Evaluation of iatrogenic lesions in 722 surgically treated cases of peripheral nerve trauma. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 905–12 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|23.||van Langenhove M, Pollefliet A, Vanderstraeten G: A retrospective electrodiagnostic evaluation of footdrop in 303 patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 29:145–52.|
|24.||Won YH, Kim KW, Choi JT, Ko MH, Park SH, Seo JH: Correlation between muscle electrophysiology and strength after fibular nerve injury. Neurol Sci 2016; 37: 1293–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|25.||Tsukamoto H, Granata G, Coraci D, Paolasso I, Padua L: Ultrasound and neurophysiological correlation in common fibular nerve conduction block at fibular head. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 1491–5 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|26.||Jonsson S, Wiberg R, McGrath AM, et al.: Effect of delayed peripheral nerve repair on nerve regeneration, Schwann cell function and target muscle recovery. PLoS One 2013; 8: e56484 CrossRefMEDLINE PubMed Central|
|27.||Glocker F, et al.: Lumbale Radikulopathie, S2k-Leitlinie, 2018. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (eds.), Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. www.dgn.org/leitlinien.|
|28.||Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G: Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 1040–5 CrossRef|
|29.||Kretschmer T, Antoniadis G, Asmus H: Nervenchirurgie. Springer 2013 CrossRef|
|30.||Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, et al.: S3-Leitlinie: Versorgung peripherer Nervenverletzungen. AWMF online 2013; /www.awmf.org/ (last accessed on 13 March 2019).|
|31.||Kim DH, Murovic JA, Teil RL, Kline DG: Management and outcomes in 318 operative common peroneal nerve lesions at the LSU Health Sciences Center. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 1421–9 CrossRef|
|32.||Aprile I, Caliandro P, Giannini F, et al.: Italian multicentre study of peroneal mononeuropathy at the fibular head: study design and preliminary results. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 92: 63–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|33.||Biesalski K, Mayer L: Die Physiologische Sehnenverpflanzung. Berlin: Julius Springer 1916.|
|34.||Cho BK, Park KJ, Choi SM, Im SH, SooHoo NF: Functional outcomes following anterior transfer of the tibialis posterior tendon for foot drop secondary to peroneal nerve palsy. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 8: 627–33 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|35.||Steinau HU, Tofaute A, Huellmann K, et al.: Tendon transfers for drop foot correction: long-term results including quality of life assessment, and dynamometric and pedobarographic measurements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 903–10 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|36.||Su HL, Chiang CY, Lu ZH, et al.: Late administration of high-frequency electrical stimulation increases nerve regeneration without aggravating neuropathic pain in a nerve crush injury. BMC Neurosci 2018; 19: 37 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|37.||Pittock SJ, Moore AP, Hrdiman O, et al.: A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled evaluation of three doses of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of spastic equinovarus deformity after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15: 289–300 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|38.||Kaji R, Osako Y, Suyama K, et al.: Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Neurol 2010; 257: 1330–7 CrossRef CrossRef MEDLINE|
|39.||van der Wilk D, Dijkstra PU, Postema K, Verkerke GJ, Hijmans JM: Effects of ankle foot orthoses on body functions and activities in people with floppy paretic ankle muscles: a systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2015; 30: 1009–25 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|40.||Willerslev-Olsen M, Petersen TH, Farmer SF, Nielsen JB: Gait training facilitates central drive to ankle dorsiflexors in children with cerebral palsy. Brain 2015; 138: 589–603 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|e1.||Petr O, Glodny B, Brawanski K, et al.: Immediate versus delayed surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation for acute motor deficits: The impact of surgical tming on functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44:454–63 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|e2.||Maalla R, Youssef M, Ben Lassoued N, et al.: Peroneal nerve entrapment at the fibular head: outcomes of neurolysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99: 719–22 CrossRef MEDLINE|