Clinical Practice Guideline
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Snoring in Adults
Background: Snoring in adults is a common cause of distress for patients and their bedpartners and calls for appropriate counseling, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment.
Methods: A systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was carried out in February 2018 and yielded pertinent publications from 2000 onward. The guideline was created according to the methodological requirements of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF).
Results: The diagnostic evaluation of snoring is based on the history and phyical examination. In certain situations, a specialized sleep study should be performed to obtain objective findings. The recommended methods of conservative treatment include, in particular, positioning therapy and weight loss. Mandibular protrusion splints can lessen snoring in suitable cases. If breathing through the nose is impaired, rhinological or rhinosurgical treatment is recommended; for certain anatomical abnormalities of the soft palate, a suitable minimally invasive surgical procedure can be considered. The level of the available evidence is low, as most of the underlying clinical studies involved small patient groups and short follow-up.
Conclusion: In the treatment of snoring, evidence-based recommendations derived from the findings of randomized trials can be given for selected situations, yet the overall state of the evidence on many diagnostic and therapeutic techniques remains limited.
Due to its frequency and the burden it creates on those affected, snoring in adults requires expert consultation, diagnosis, and, where necessary, treatment. Snoring can manifest either as an independent phenomenon or as a symptom of a sleep disorder, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The latter is not dealt with in this guideline. Epidemiological studies on the frequency of snoring are rare and OSA can generally not be reliably ruled out. Since the underlying definitions are often not standardized, data on prevalence vary between 2 and 86% (1). In the UK, 20% of women and 26% of men up to the age of 24 years report regular snoring. The highest prevalence for snoring is attained between the ages of 45 and 54 years; however, there are no data for Germany (2).
Whereas OSA represents a confirmed cardiovascular risk factor, the situation is difficult to determine for isolated snoring. A handful of prospective studies suggest possible negative cardiovascular effects—however, the clinical relevance of these data is virtually impossible to estimate at present and, as such, they provide no guidance on the need to treat (3, 4).
There are also scarcely any guidelines on snoring in the international literature. This is in part due to the difficulty of defining objective parameters on symptom severity and, as a result, achieving treatment success, as well as to a lack of controlled treatment studies.
This guideline is addressed to all those involved in the diagnosis and treatment of snoring. The central questions relate to:
- The value of individual diagnostic methods (sleep nasendoscopy and pharyngeal manometry )
- The effectiveness of the most important conservative (positional therapy, myofascial therapy, weight reduction, and mandibular advancement splints) and surgical (soft palate and nasal surgery) treatment options.
The guideline has been drawn up in accordance with the methodological requirements of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF) and represents an S3 guideline. All participants are listed in Box 1.
In a first step, a literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE for existing Cochrane reviews, as well as earlier guidelines or systematic review articles. Guidelines were evaluated and considered in accordance with the German guideline assessment instrument (Deutsches Leitlinien-Bewertungsinstrument, DELBI), and systematic review articles in accordance with standardized criteria (Revised Assessment of Multiple SysTemAtic Reviews, AMSTAR) (5). The general literature search was conducted from 2000 onwards in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (eBox). The results of the literature selection are presented in the form of a PRISMA diagram (PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) (eFigure) (6). The selected studies were evaluated on the basis of a standardized procedure and the results transferred to evidence tables (summarized in the Table). The evidence levels of the publications were assessed according to the levels defined by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM).
- The affected individual or their bed partner reports respiration-dependent, generally inspiratory, acoustic phenomena during sleep, whereby objective parameters for the definition of the acoustic phenomena as “snoring” are not available at present.
- The affected individual does not complain of a sleep disorder that could be causally attributed to the snoring.
- Sleep medicine diagnostics yield no indication of the presence of another sleep-related respiratory disorder.
Standard diagnostic procedures are described below; further procedures may be necessary depending on the individual case and the planned treatment methods (Figure 1).
A patient history—including information from the bed partner where possible—should be taken from snorers (strong consensus). The thorough interview on patient history can be structured according to topic (Box 2). The supplementary use of questionnaires is recommended (strong consensus). Validated questionnaires include, for example, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), although these are unhelpful from a differential diagnostic perspective.
The aim of the clinical examination is to identify changes in the upper airways that could be responsible for the production of snoring noises. Although vibrations in endonasal structures are generally not possible due to the stability of the nasal skeleton, impaired nasal breathing can be a co-factor in the development of snoring in other regions, for example, in the region of the soft palate. In the case of a nasal breathing impairment, a clinical examination of the nose should be carried out in order to assess the nasal structures relevant to airflow (strong consensus). An examination of the nose may be helpful even in cases where no nasal breathing impairment has been reported (strong consensus).
Due to its slight tendency to collapse, the oropharynx is a predilection site for the development of snoring noises and its examination (flexible transnasal, rigid transoral) can influence the therapeutic approach. An examination of the oropharynx should be carried out (strong consensus). In the case of clinical suspicion of laryngeal snoring, laryngoscopy should be performed; this can be combined with drug-induced sleep endoscopy (strong consensus).
An examination of the oral cavity should be carried out (strong consensus). If treatment with an advancement splint is considered, an assessment of possible lower jaw protrusion should be performed; dental status should be recorded and a clinical functional assessment of the temperomandibular joint and masticatory muscles made for orientation (consensus).
The diagnostic work-up of snoring should include a clinical assessment of the morphology of the facial skeleton for orientation (strong consensus).
Additional diagnostic methods including technical investigations such as nasal function tests, allergy diagnosis, imaging, and acoustic analysis can be helpful in some cases (strong consensus).
Sleep endoscopy and pharyngeal manometry
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) offers the advantage of observing the upper respiratory tract while the patient is in a sleep-like state. DISE can be performed for the purposes of: topographical diagnosis of the upper respiratory tract in the case of snoring alone, differentiation from OSA, and establishing the indication for surgical treatment of the soft palate (evidence level 2b, recommendation grade 0, strong consensus) (9–12). However, studies on the superiority of this procedure compared to clinical investigation with regard to patient selection for treatment interventions for snoring are not available. Due to the lack of external evidence, it is not possible to make a statement on the use of pressure transducers in the diagnostic work-up of snoring (strong consensus). While pharyngeal manometry is a complementary outpatient examination, the question of whether DISE should be performed on an outpatient or inpatient basis and whether the costs are covered is still largely unresolved.
Polysomnography is the diagnostic gold standard of sleep medicine investigations; alternatively, (outpatient) cardiorespiratory polygraphy can be used under certain conditions (13). An instrument-based sleep medicine investigation (such as polygraphy or a comparable procedure) should be performed in cases in which:
- Another sleep-related breathing disorder is suspected
- A patient wishes to be treated for snoring
- Relevant cardiovascular vascular comorbidities are present (strong consensus).
Snoring as defined in this guideline is currently not considered a disease and, as such, is only treated if a patient desires treatment. The methods described below (Figure 2) can be used either in isolation or in combination. While some treatment options can be evaluated on the basis of randomized controlled trials (such as snoring-triggered changes in head position, treatment with intraoral devices, and surgical treatment of the soft palate), only case control series (surgical treatment of the nose) or no relevant studies (weight reduction, myofascial therapy) are available for other options.
The conservative approaches for which effectiveness has been evaluated include positional therapy, myofascial therapy, and weight reduction (Table). Due to a lack of clinical studies, no evidence-based statement can be made on the efficacy of avoidance of a supine position (strong consensus). In the case of supine position-related snoring, an attempt at treatment by avoiding the supine position should be offered (evidence level 5, recommendation grade B, strong consensus). A randomized controlled study (RCT) with a total of 22 patients investigated the effect of a pillow that is able to trigger a change in head position when snoring is registered (14). A reduction was seen in both polysomnographically measured and subjectively determined snoring intensity. Snoring-triggered change of head position should be offered for the reduction of snoring (evidence level 1b, recommendation grade B, strong consensus).
There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend myofascial measures for the treatment of snoring (strong consensus).
Only studies on weight reduction in patients with OSA are available in the literature. A decrease in body mass index (BMI) results in a reduction in snoring particularly in patients with overweight or obesity and OSA (15). A reduction in BMI should be recommended for all overweight snorers, despite the scarcity of scientific evidence on this (evidence level 5, recommendation grade A, strong consensus).
In the case of impaired nasal breathing in the area of the nasal valve, an attempt at treatment with internal or external nasal dilators should be proposed (strong consensus). The short-term use of decongestant nasal spray/drops to simulate surgical treatment of the nasal concha can be considered (strong consensus). Systemic drug treatment or local intraoral use of oils or sprays is not recommended (strong consensus).
Mandibular advancement devices (MAD), which are no different to those used to treat OSA, can be used to control snoring (Table) (16). A crossover trial compared the effectiveness of MAD in terms of snoring reduction and the effect on quality of life with CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) therapy (17). MAD were able to significantly reduce the snoring outcome score. In an RCT, an MAD showed superior reduction in snoring compared to a placebo splint (18). Another RCT demonstrated a significant improvement in the snoring symptoms inventory compared to a placebo splint (19). In suitable cases (Box 3), and when treatment is desired, the management of snoring with the use of an MAD can be recommended (evidence level 1b, recommendation grade A, strong consensus). The fitting and monitoring of an MAD should be carried out in conjunction with dental and sleep medicine experts (evidence level 5, recommendation grade A, strong consensus). The available studies with short follow-up times do not permit any reliable statements to be made on possible long-term side effects/complications in the indication of snoring. Bearing the literature on OSA in mind, attention should be paid in the case of long-term use to side effects in the area of the stomatognathic system (for example, changes in bite and tooth position). An MAD should only be considered if the mandible has sufficient mobility to be advanced (evidence level 5, recommendation grade B, strong consensus).
Thermoplastic splints are discussed critically in terms of their durability and effectiveness. However, in an RCT, effectiveness was also documented for a partially adjustable thermoplastic splint (20). Robust evidence-based long-term data on the effectiveness and side effects of ready-made splints were not available at a the time of drawing-up this guideline.
In many cases, there is only scant long-term evidence on the success rates of surgical treatment options, and not all procedures have been sufficiently evaluated as yet. The selection and efficacy of a procedure depend to a crucial extent on the individual anatomical findings and on BMI. Minimally invasive surgical procedures should be preferred for the surgical management of snoring (strong consensus).
The efficacy of surgical methods in the nasal region has been investigated in a number of case control series, whereby the follow-up period was generally 6 months. A retrospective study compared the effectiveness of septoplasty and turbinoplasty with other surgical procedures for snoring and a significant improvement in subjective snoring intensity was seen (21). Prospective case control series also demonstrated the effect of septoplasty alone on subjective, but not objective, snoring intensity (22–24). The results of the above-mentioned studies suggest that a surgical improvement in nasal airflow leads to a subjective reduction in snoring. Possible side effects and complications of the procedure do not differ from nasal surgery for a primary rhinological indication. In the case of a primary rhinological indication to improve subjective nasal breathing impairment, surgical treatment for snoring should be offered; this is able to achieve a subjective improvement in snoring (evidence level 3b, recommendation grade B, strong consensus). According to current evidence, nasal surgery with the aim of reducing simple snoring in patients with concomitant nasal breathing impairment should be offered (evidence level 3b, recommendation grade B, strong consensus). Due to a lack of evidence, no statement can be made on the effectiveness of nasal surgery in snorers with no subjective nasal breathing impairment (strong consensus).
The comparatively high number of publications on soft palate surgery reflects its significance in the treatment of snoring (Table). However, reliable clinical studies are only available for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), a modification of uvulopalatoplasty, radiofrequency (RAUP) or laser-assisted UPP (LAUP), radiofrequency therapy (RFT), and soft palate implants. The efficacy of interstitial RFT was investigated as part of an RCT (25). With regard to a reduction in snoring, a significant difference was seen between the groups at 6–8 weeks following treatment. The combination of interstitial therapy and radiofrequency-assisted resection of excess mucosa appears to enhance the effect (26). However, an investigation on the long-term effect of this combined approach showed snoring intensity to increase again after 1.5 years (27).
Two other working groups observed a similar development in the long-term course (28, 29). In a direct comparison of RFT of the soft palate and injection snoreplasty, a reduction in snoring intensity was achieved in both groups 6 weeks following the intervention. This reduction was greater in the radiofrequency group than in the comparison group (30). Postoperative pain following RFT of the soft palate is low compared to other soft palate procedures, and complications such as mucosal ulceration/defects are rare when the procedure is performed correctly.
In a collective of 99 patients, a reduction in snoring intensity was seen 3 months following treatment with soft palate implants (31). An RCT investigated whether more rigid implants have a greater effect compared to conventional implants—this, however, could not be confirmed (32). The patients with regular implants were followed-up over a period of 3 years (33); snoring intensity determined by means of visual analog scales was reduced. Differing extrusion rates depending on the properties of the implants have been reported. In the case of early extrusion, the affected implants can be removed and de novo implantation is possible.
If the soft palate is the suspected source of snoring, therapy in the form of surgical procedures on the soft palate should be proposed in cases where treatment is desired (evidence level 1b, recommendation grade A, consensus). If soft palate surgery is performed, minimally invasive procedures such as radiofrequency therapy (evidence level 1b, recommendation grade A) or soft palate implants in specific indications (evidence level 4, recommendation grade B) should be used while taking the individual anatomy of the patient into consideration (strong consensus). The indication for invasive UPPP, which is usually performed with tonsillectomy, should be made on the basis of strict criteria due to its increased morbidity and complication rate (strong consensus).
Minimally invasive procedures on the base of the tongue and palatine tonsils may be beneficial in the treatment of snoring in individual cases (strong consensus). Invasive surgical procedures outside the nose and soft palate are not recommended for the treatment of snoring (strong consensus).
Need for further research
The following research questions arose from an analysis of the available literature:
- Do DISE or pharyngeal manometry recordings have an additional predictive value with regard to the selection of a treatment procedure?
- Does snoring improve following weight loss in overweight or obese snorers?
- Is positional therapy to prevent a supine position also effective in snoring?
- Are there clinical predictors for the effectiveness of MAD in snoring?
This guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of snoring in adults contains recommendations on the diagnostic work-up of snoring, as well as its conservative, instrument-based, and surgical treatment.
Conflict of interests
Prof. Stuck received consulting fees from Philipps Healthcare and Snoozeal Ltd. He received congress fee and travel cost reimbursement as well as lecture fees from Snoozeal Ltd., Inspire Medical Systems, and Sutter Medizintechnik. He received study support (third-party funding) from Snoozeal Ltd..
PD Dr. Hofauer received consulting fees from Galvani Bioelectronics. He received congress fee and travel cost reimbursement as well as lecture fees from Inspire Medical Systems.
Manuscript submitted on 11 August 2019, revised version accepted on 23 September 2019
Clinical guidelines in the Deutsches Ärzteblatt, as in numerous other specialist journals, are not subject to a peer review procedure, since S3 guidelines represent texts that have already been evaluated, discussed, and broadly agreed upon multiple times by experts (peers).
PD Dr. med. Benedikt Hofauer
Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde
Killianstraße 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
Cite this as
Stuck BA, Hofauer B: Clinical practice guideline: The diagnosis and treatment of snoring in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019; 116: 817–24. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0817
eFigure and eBox:
niversity Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg: Prof. Dr. med. Boris A. Stuck
Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg: PD Dr. med. Benedikt Hofauer
All participants in the clinical practice guideline The Diagnosis and Treatment of Snoring in Adults are listed in Box 1.
|1.||Hoffstein V: Snoring and upper airway resistance. In: Kryger M, Roth T, Dement WC (eds.): Principles and practice of sleep medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders 2005; 1001–12 CrossRef|
|2.||Ohayon MM, Guilleminault C, Priest RG, Caulet M: Snoring and breathing pauses during sleep: telephone interview survey of a United Kingdom population sample. BMJ 1997; 314: 860–3 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|3.||Lee SA, Amis TC, Byth K, et al.: Heavy snoring as a cause of carotid artery atherosclerosis. Sleep 2008; 31: 1207–13.|
|4.||Cho JG, Witting PK, Verma M, et al.: Tissue vibration induces carotid artery endothelial dysfunction: a mechanism linking snoring and carotid atherosclerosis. Sleep 2011; 34: 751–7 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|5.||Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al.: External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One 2007; 2: e1350 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|6.||Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA G: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|7.||Stuck BA, Weeß HG: Die neue „International Classification of Sleep Disorders“. Eine kritische Würdigung der diagnostischen Kriterien für schlafbezogene Atmungsstörungen. Somnologie (Berl) 2015; 19: 126–32 CrossRef|
|8.||Medicine AAOS: International classification of sleep disorders. 3rd Edition. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, IL 2014.|
|9.||Steinhart H, Kuhn-Lohmann JC, Gewalt K, et al.: [Pharyngolaryngoscopic findings in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and primary snoring]. HNO 2000; 48: 917–21 CrossRefMEDLINE|
|10.||den Herder C, van Tinteren H, de Vries N: Sleep endoscopy versus modified Mallampati score in sleep apnea and snoring. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 735–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|11.||Hessel NS, de Vries N: Results of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty after diagnostic workup with polysomnography and sleep endoscopy: a report of 136 snoring patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 260: 91–5.|
|12.||Xu HJ, Jia RF, Yu H, et al.: Investigation of the source of snoring sound by drug-induced sleep nasendoscopy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2015; 77: 359–65 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|13.||Mayer G, Arzt M, Braumann B, et al.: German S3 Guideline nonrestorative sleep/sleep disorders. Somnologie (Berl) 2017; 21: 290–301 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central|
|14.||Cazan D, Mehrmann U, Wenzel A, Maurer JT: The effect on snoring of using a pillow to change the head position. Sleep Breath 2017; 21: 615–21 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|15.||Toor P, Kim K, Buffington CK: Sleep quality and duration before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2012; 22: 890–5 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|16.||Stradling JR, Negus TW, Smith D, Langford B: Mandibular advancement devices for the control of snoring. Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 447–50 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|17.||Robertson S, Murray M, Young D, Pilley R, Dempster J: A randomized crossover trial of conservative snoring treatments: mandibular repositioning splint and nasal CPAP. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 283–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|18.||Johnston CD, Gleadhill IC, Cinnamond MJ, Peden WM: Oral appliances for the management of severe snoring: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 127–34 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|19.||Maguire J, Steele JG, Gibson GJ, Wilson JA, Steen N, McCracken GI: Randomised cross-over study of oral appliances for snoring. Clin Otolaryngol 2010; 35: 204–9 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|20.||Cooke ME, Battagel JM: A thermoplastic mandibular advancement device for the management of non-apnoeic snoring: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 327–38 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|21.||Sabbe AV, De Medts J, Delsupehe K: Surgical treatments for snoring. B-ENT 2017; 13: 1–7.|
|22.||Virkkula P, Maasilta P, Hytönen M, Salmi T, Malmberg H: Nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing: the effect of supine body position on nasal measurements in snorers. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 648–54 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|23.||Virkkula P, Bachour A, Hytönen M, et al.: Snoring is not relieved by nasal surgery despite improvement in nasal resistance. Chest 2006; 129: 81–7 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|24.||Wu J, Zang HR, Wang T, et al.: Evaluation of the subjective efficacy of nasal surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2017; 131: 37–43 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|25.||Stuck BA, Sauter A, Hörmann K, Verse T, Maurer JT: Radiofrequency surgery of the soft palate in the treatment of snoring. A placebo-controlled trial. Sleep 2005; 28: 847–50 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|26.||Baisch A, Maurer JT, Hörmann K, Stuck BA: Combined radiofrequency assisted uvulopalatoplasty in the treatment of snoring. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266: 125–30 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|27.||Stuck BA: Radiofrequency-assisted uvulopalatoplasty for snoring: Long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1617–20 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|28.||Hultcrantz E, Harder L, Loord H, et al.: Long-term effects of radiofrequency ablation of the soft palate on snoring. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267: 137–42 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|29.||Bäck LJ, Tervahartiala PO, Piilonen AK, Partinen MM, Ylikoski JS: Bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of the soft palate in habitual snorers without significant desaturations assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 865–71 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|30.||Iseri M, Balcioglu O: Radiofrequency versus injection snoreplasty in simple snoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133: 224–8 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|31.||Kühnel TS, Hein G, Hohenhorst W, Maurer JT: Soft palate implants: a new option for treating habitual snoring. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262: 277–80 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|32.||Skjøstad KW, Stene BK, Norgård S: Consequences of increased rigidity in palatal implants for snoring: a randomized controlled study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134: 63–6 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|33.||Skjøstad KW, Nordg Rd S: Three-year follow-up of palatal implants for the treatment of snoring. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131: 1299–302 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|34.||Lim DJ, Kang SH, Kim BH, Kim HG: Treatment of primary snoring using radiofrequency-assisted uvulopalatoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 761–7 CrossRef MEDLINE|
|35.||Stuck BA, Braumann B, Heiser C, et al.: [S3 Guideline „Diagnosis and Therapy of Snoring in Adults“]. Somnologie (Berl) 2019; in press.|
Nasal symptoms increase the risk of snoring and snoring increases the risk of nasal symptoms. A longitudinal population studySleep and Breathing, 202110.1007/s11325-020-02287-8