DÄ internationalArchive14/2007Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Review article

Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Current Concepts

Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104(14): A-952

Lindner, O; Rusche, H; Schäfers, M; Schober, O; Burchert, W

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

1. Bundes­ärzte­kammer, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung: Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Chronische KHK (Kurzfassung). Mai 2006; Version 1.1. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/khk/pdf/nvl_khk_kurz.pdf (Version 1.4 November 2006)
2. Bundes­ärzte­kammer, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung: Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Chronische KHK (Langfassung). 11. Februar 2006. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/khk/themen/khk/pdf/nvl_khk_lang.pdf )Version 1.4 November 2006)
3. Bruckenberger E: Herzbericht 2004 mit Transplantationschirurgie; 2005. Selbstverlag, Hannover, Hitzackerweg 1a.
4. Heller GV: Tracer selection with different stress modalities based on tracer kinetics. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: S15–21. MEDLINE
5. Kapur A, Latus KA, Davies G, et al.: A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29: 1608–16. MEDLINE
6. ICRP Publication 62: Radiological protection in biomedical research. Annals of the ICRP Vol. 22/4, Pergamon Press; 1993.
7. ICRP Publication 80: Radiological protection in biomedical research. Annals of the ICRP Vol 28/3, Pergamon Press; 1998.
8. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz: Röntgendiagnostik – schädlich oder nützlich? 2006. http://www.bfs.de/www/extfs/bfs/druck/strahlenthemen/STTH_Roentgen.pdf
9. Cerqueira MD: Pharmacologic stress versus maximal-exercise stress for perfusion imaging: which, when, and why? J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: S10–4. MEDLINE
10. Paul AK, Hasegawa S, Yoshioka J et al.: Exercise-induced stunning continues for at least one hour: evaluation with quantitative gated single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 410–5. MEDLINE
11. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE: Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11: 171–85. MEDLINE
12. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH et al.: ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2003; American College of Cardiology Web site. www.acc.org/clinical/ guidelines/radio/index.pdf
13. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina – summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). 2003; American College of Cardiology. www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/stable/stable_clean.pdf.
14. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ et al.: Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 535–43. MEDLINE
15. Abdel Fattah A, Kamal AM, Pancholy S et al.: Prognostic implications of normal exercise tomographic thallium images in patients with angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 769–71. MEDLINE
16. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB et al.: Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999; 100: 1035–42. MEDLINE
17. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X et al.: Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 831–7. MEDLINE
18. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V: Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995; 92: 657–71. MEDLINE
19. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E et al.: From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003; 108: 1664–72. MEDLINE
20. Hasdai D, Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR Jr., Higano ST, Lerman A: Coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans is associated with myocardial perfusion defects. Circulation 1997; 96: 3390–5. MEDLINE
21. Zeiher AM, Krause T, Schachinger V, Minners J, Moser E: Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels is associated with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995; 91: 2345–52. MEDLINE
22. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217–25. MEDLINE
23. Pompa JJ, Kuntz RE, Baim DS: Percutaneous coronary and valvular intervention. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 1367–98.
24. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS: The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 2005; 35: 62–72. MEDLINE
25. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS: Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003; 107: 2900–7. MEDLINE
e1. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111: 2906–12. MEDLINE
e2. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D et al.: Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation 1989; 80: 87–98. MEDLINE
e3. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP et al.: ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2003; American College of Cardiology www.acc.org/clinical/guide lines/echo/index_clean.pdf
e4. Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A, Stillman AE: Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 676–5. MEDLINE
e5. Lindner O, Fricke E, Preuss R et al.: Nicht-invasive Diagnostik der KHK bei Diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Stoffwechsel und Herz 2006; 15: 33–43.

Info

Specialities