DÄ internationalArchive31-32/2007Current State of Non-Invasive Coronary MSCT Angiography

Review article

Current State of Non-Invasive Coronary MSCT Angiography

Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104(31-32): A-2201

Mahnken, A H; Mühlenbruch, G; Dohmen, G; Kelm, M; Wildberger, J E; Günther, R W

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

1. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ et al.: Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for non-invasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 404–11. MEDLINE
2. Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T et al.: Multidetektor-CT des Herzens: Erste klinische Anwendung einer retrospektiv EKG-gesteuerten Spirale mit optimierter zeitlicher und örtlicher Auflösung zur Darstellung der Herzkranzgefäße. Rofo 2000; 172: 429–35. MEDLINE
3. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R et al.: Peformance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying spot. Rofo 2004; 176: 1803–10. MEDLINE
4. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al.: First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 256–68. MEDLINE
5. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al.: Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331–5. MEDLINE
6. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al.: Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1761–91. MEDLINE
7. Simon A, Chironi G, Levenson J: Performance of subclinical arterial disease detection as a screening test for coronary heart disease. Hypertension 2006; 48: 392–6. MEDLINE
8. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK et al.: Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of classification. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 1323. MEDLINE
9. Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al.: Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1409–15. MEDLINE
10. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575–82. MEDLINE
11. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al.: High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318–23. MEDLINE
12. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al.: Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16-slice computed tomography. Heart 2006; 92: 58–61. MEDLINE
13. Stein PD, Beemath A, Skaf E et al.: Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1669–73. MEDLINE
14. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, Romagnoli R, Modena MG: Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 1094–7. MEDLINE
15. Juergens KU, Fischbach R: Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 342–57. MEDLINE
16. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al.: Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 2042–7. MEDLINE
17. Schmermund A, Erbel R: Non-invasive computed tomographic coronary angiography: the end of the beginning. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1451–3. MEDLINE
18. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al.: ACCF / ACR / SCCT / SCMR / ASNC / NASCI / SCAI / SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1475–97. MEDLINE
19. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U et al.: Assessment of coronary remodelling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 842–7. MEDLINE
20. Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Muders M et al.: Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2094–8. MEDLINE
21. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al.: Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482–7. MEDLINE
22. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA: Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552–7. MEDLINE
23. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006; 70: 564–71. MEDLINE
24. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al.: Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 111–7. MEDLINE
25. Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T, Soo CS, Pregalathan N, Mahnken AH: Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 2006; Sep 29. MEDLINE
e1. American Heart Association: Heart and stroke statistics-2006 update. American Heart Association, Dallas 2006.
e2. Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M: Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology 1995; 196: 707–14. MEDLINE
e3. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH: CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296: 403–11. MEDLINE
e4. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al.: Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001; 357: 599–603. MEDLINE
e5. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB: CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics 2003; 23: 167–80. MEDLINE
e6. Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW: Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 213: 751–8. MEDLINE
e7. O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al.: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000; 102: 126–40. MEDLINE
e8. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM et al.: Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1964–72. MEDLINE
e9. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al.: A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5–40. MEDLINE
e10. Spagnolo P, Sironi S, Khouri T, Garlaschi G, Fazio F: Myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery and anomalous origin of circumflex coronary artery: preoperative assessment with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 17–20. MEDLINE
e11. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G et al.: Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 402–6. MEDLINE
e12. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B: Multislice-CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Rofo 2006; 178: 600–4. MEDLINE
e13. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A et al.: Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 2003; 175: 1051–5. MEDLINE
e14. Jung B, Mahnken AH, Stargardt A et al.: Individually weight-adapted examination protocol in retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2560–6. MEDLINE
e15. Mc Collough C, Primak A, Saba O, Stiertorfer K, Suess C, Bruder H: Dose performance of a new 64-channel Dual-Source (DSCT) Scanner. http://rsna2005.rsna.org/rsna2005/V2005/conference/ event_display.cfm?id=66601&em_id=4425806
e16. Betsou S, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G: Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 634–9. MEDLINE
e17. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R: Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 597–603. MEDLINE
e18. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM et al.: Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003; 89: 167–72. MEDLINE
e19. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al.: 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 818–26. MEDLINE
e20. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T et al.: Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 8–13. MEDLINE
e21. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G et al.: Non-invasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 110–2. MEDLINE
a22. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR et al.: Multi-slice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006; 114: 645–53. MEDLINE
e23. Burgstahler C, Beck T, Kuettner A et al.: Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-row multi-slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Int J Cardiol 2006; 106: 244–9. MEDLINE
e24. Herzog C, Dogan S, Diebold T et al.: Multi-detector row CT versus coronary angiography: preoperative evaluation before totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Radiology 2003; 229: 200–8. MEDLINE
e25. Begemann PGC, Arnold M, Detter C et al.: Die EKG-getriggerte 4-Zeilen-Spiral-CT des Herzens in der präoperativen Bildgebung vor minimalinvasiver koronarer Bypass-Operation. Rofo 2005; 177: 1084–93. MEDLINE
e26. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S et al.: Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 551–9. MEDLINE
e27. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Sagmeister S, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Becker CR: Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multirow-detector computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 286–92. MEDLINE
e28. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach G: Kontrastangehobene MRT und MSCT zur kardialen Vitalitätsdiagnostik. Rofo 2006; 178: 771–80. MEDLINE
e29. Muhlenbruch G, Koos R, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH: Imaging of the cardiac venous system: comparison of MDCT and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1252–7. MEDLINE
e30. Löwel H: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes – Heft 33: Koronare Herzkrankheit und akuter Myokardinfarkt. Berlin: Robert-Koch Institut 2006.
e31. Datta J, White CS, Gilkeson RC et al.: Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2005; 235: 812–8. MEDLINE
e32. Dewey M, Lembcke A, Enzweiler C, Hamm B, Rogalla P: Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 800–4. MEDLINE
e33. Thomsen HS: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on the safe use of iodinated contrast media. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60: 307–13. MEDLINE
e34. Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Stillman AE et al.: Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenotic coronary segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis 2003; 14: 459–62. MEDLINE
e35. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al.: Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16 -detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006; 240: 47–55. MEDLINE
e36. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al.: Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2739–47. MEDLINE
e37. Mori S, Kondo C, Suzuki N et al.: Volumetric cine imaging for cardiovascular circulation using prototype 256-detector row computed tomography scanner (4-dimensional computed tomography): a preliminary study with a porcine model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 26–30. MEDLINE
e38. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al.: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147–54. MEDLINE
e39. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A et al.: Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343–8. MEDLINE
e40. Ghostine S, Caussin C, Daoud B et al.: Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1929–34. MEDLINE
e41. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al.: Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 427–30. MEDLINE
e42. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS et al.: Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1573–9. MEDLINE
e43. Cademartiri F, Marano R, Runza G et al.: Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multi-slice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol Med 2005; 109: 500–7. MEDLINE
e44. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, Lemos PA et al.: Usefulness of multi-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 799–802. MEDLINE
e45. Watanabe M, Uemura S, Iwama H et al.: Usefulness of 16-slice multi-slice spiral computed tomography for follow-up study of coronary stent implantation. Circ J 2006; 70: 691–7. MEDLINE
e46. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al.: Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2567–72. MEDLINE
e47. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 951–9. MEDLINE
e48. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kühl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J: Non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1224–9. MEDLINE
e49. Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema W et al.: Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 77–81. MEDLINE
e50. Vernhet-Kovacsik H, Battistella P, Demaria R et al.: Early postoperative assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and anatomy: value of contrast-enhanced 16-MDCT with retrospectively ECG-gated reconstructions. AJR 2006; 186: 395–400. MEDLINE