DÄ internationalArchive36/2007Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Review article

Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104(36): A-2424

Höfner, K; Tunn, U; Reich, O; Rübben, H

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

1. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung. Kapitel 13: Prostataresektion. Qualitätsreport. Düsseldorf: Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH 2002: 138–49.
2. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung. Kapitel 27: Prostataresektion. Qualitätsreport. Düsseldorf: Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH 2003: 301–16.
3. Berges R, Dreikorn K, Höfner K et al.: Leitlinie der Deutschen Urologen zur Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms. Urologe A 2003; 42: 722–38. MEDLINE
4. Berges R, Dreikorn K, Höfner K et al.: Leitlinie der Deutschen Urologen zur Diagnostik des benignen Prostatasyndroms. Urologe A 2003; 42: 584–90. MEDLINE
5. Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Barry MJ et al.: Guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). American Urological Association Education and Research 2003. Chapter 3: Appendix 1–56, Internet Link: http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/bph.cfm
6. Naber KG, Hofstetter AG, Brühl P et al.: Perioperative Prophylaxe bei Eingriffen an den Harnwegen und im männlichen Genitalbereich. Urologe A 2001; 40: 73–80.
7. Reich O, Gratzke C, Stief C: Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures for BPH. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 970–8. MEDLINE
8. Kirollos M, Campbell N: Factors influencing blood loss in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): auditing TURP. Br J Urol 1997; 80: 111–5. MEDLINE
9. Haab F, Yamaguchi R, Leach GE: Postprostatectomy incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23: 447–57. MEDLINE
10. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC: A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The veterans affairs cooperative study group on transurethral resection of the prostate. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 75–9. MEDLINE
11. Berger AP, Wirtenberger W, Bektic J et al.: Safer transurethral resection of the prostate: coagulating intermittent cutting reduces hemo-static complications. J Urol 2004; 171: 289–91. MEDLINE
12. Barba M, Leyh H, Hartung R: New technologies in transurethral resection of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 2000; 10: 9–14. MEDLINE
13. Mohr C, Awn A, Vasseghi H et al.: Effizienz und Komplikationen der klassischen TURP versus Dry-Cut/Vaporesektion. 51. Tagung der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Gesellschaft für Urologie; 2005.
14. Perlmutter AP, Vallancien G: Thick loop transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 161–5. MEDLINE
15. Reich O, Schneede P, Zaak D: Ex-vivo comparison of the haemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate. BJU Int 2003; 92: 319–22. MEDLINE
16. Talic RF, Al Kudair WK, El Tiraifi AE et al.: The „Wing“ versus the „Vapor Cut“ electrodes in transurethral electrovaporization-resection of the prostate: comparative changes in safety parameters. Urol Int 2000; 65: 95–9. MEDLINE
17. Kupeli S, Yilmaz E, Soygur T, Budak M: Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2001; 15: 317–21. MEDLINE
18. Cury CA, Azoubel R, Batigalia F: Bladder drainage and glandular epithelial morphome-try of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia with severe symptoms. Int Braz J Urol 2006; 32: 211–5. MEDLINE
19. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D et al.: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences 2001; www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.aspE
20. Wendt-Nordahl G, Hacker A, Fastenmeier K et al.: New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol 2005; 19: 1203–9. MEDLINE
21. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F: A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 2005; 174: 1339–43. MEDLINE
22. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K: Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005; 19: 333–8. MEDLINE
23. Erturhan S, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, Yagci F, Ustun A: Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007; 10: 97–100. MEDLINE
24. Starkman JS, Santucci RA: Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 2005; 95: 69–71. MEDLINE

Info

Specialities