DÄ internationalArchive38/2007Lumbar Intervertebral Total Disc Replacement

Review article

Lumbar Intervertebral Total Disc Replacement

A Narrative Review

Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104(38): A-2592

Gravius, S; Weißkopf, M; Ohnsorge, J A K; Maus, U; Niethard, F U; Wirtz, D C

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

1. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD et al.: Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1: 143–54. MEDLINE
2. Mayer HM: Total disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1029–37. MEDLINE
3. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al.: A prospective, randomised multicentre food & drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30: 1565–75. MEDLINE
4. Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB: Clinical results of ProDisc II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States Clinical Trial. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 301–13. MEDLINE
5. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, Bae H: ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 2003; 28: 167–75. MEDLINE
6. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G et al.: A prospective, randomised, multicentre food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of total lumbar disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30: 1576–83. MEDLINE
7. McAffe PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS: Revisability of the Charite artificial disc replacement: Analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the Charite artificial disc. Spine 2006: 31: 1217–26. MEDLINE
8. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN et al.: Lumbar spine arthroplasty. Early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 4: 352–61. MEDLINE
9. Zigler JE: Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and US Investigation Device Exemption Study. Spine 2003; 28: 163–6. MEDLINE
10. Zigler JE: Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the Pro-Disc II. Spine J 2004; 4: 260–7. MEDLINE
11. de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WCH: Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 108–16. MEDLINE
12. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S: Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 130–6. MEDLINE
13. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ: Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 210–7. MEDLINE
14. Buttner-Janz K, Hahn S, Schikora K et al.: Principles for successful application of the Link SB Charite artificial disc. Orthopäde 2002; 31: 441–53. MEDLINE
15. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F: Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996; 21: 995–1000. MEDLINE
16. Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP et al.: The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 2004; 29: 2538–41. MEDLINE
17. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F et al.: Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 337: 64–76. MEDLINE
18. Van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ: Complications of artificial disc replacement; a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 369–83.
19. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD: Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 2003; 28: 15–23. MEDLINE
20. Krämer J, Kleinert H, Senge A, Rubenthaler F: Bandscheibenprothesen: Rückblick, Augenblick, Ausblick. Z Orthop 2005; 143: 281–6. MEDLINE
21. Wisleder D, Smith MB, Mosher TJ, Zatsiorsky V: Lumbar spine mechanical response to axial compression load in vivo. Spine 2001; 26: 403–9. MEDLINE
22. Yoshioka T, Tsuji H, Hirano N, Sainoh S: Motion characteristic of the normal lumbar spine in young adults: instantaneous axis of rotation and vertebral center motion analyses. J Spinal Disord 1990; 3: 103–13. MEDLINE
23. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG: Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001; 26: 122–9. MEDLINE
24. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F: Charite total disc replacement – clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 183–95. MEDLINE
25. Eschbach L: Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with metal implants. AO International, AO ASIF materials Expert Group, 2003.
e1. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S et al.: Experimental design of total disk replacement: experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charite. Spine 2003; 28: 153–62. MEDLINE
e2. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S et al.: SB Charite disc replacement. Report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US Centre. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 4: 424–33. MEDLINE
e3. Freeman BJC, Davenport J: Total disc replacement in lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 439–47. MEDLINE
e4. German JW, Foley KT: Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 2005; 30: 60–7. MEDLINE
e5. Bertagnoli R, Yue J, Fenk-Mayer A et al.: Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4: 91–7. MEDLINE
e6. Bertagnoli R, Yue J, Shah RV et al.: The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis. Spine 2005; 30: 2192–9. MEDLINE
e7. Fraser RD, Ross ER, Lowery GL, Freeman BJ et al.: Lumbar disc replacement. AcroFlex design and results. Spine J 2004; 4: 245–51. MEDLINE
e8. Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y et al.: Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 315–22. MEDLINE
e9. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A et al.: Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 124–30. MEDLINE
e10. Büttner-Janz K, Hommel H, Shelokov AP, Ahrens JE, Zeegers W, Lemaire JP: Langzeiterfahrungen mit der Link® – Zwischenwirbelendoprothese „SB-Charite“. Sonderdruck aus Therapie des Bandscheibenvorfalls 1998; 54–9.
e11. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K et al.: A multi-centre retrospective study of the clinical results of the link SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. Spine 1994; 19: 1842–9. MEDLINE
e12. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP et al.: Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 2005; 30: 1407–11. MEDLINE
e13. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el-H et al.: Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc. A 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: 353–9. MEDLINE
e14. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP et al.: Lumbar disc replacement: Preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of one year. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 4: 362–8. MEDLINE
e15. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP et al.: Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 490–6. MEDLINE
e16. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP et al.: Lumbar total disc replacement: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 50–64. MEDLINE
e17. David T: Revision of a Charite artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charite artificial disc: a case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 507–11. MEDLINE
e18. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Sisky R et al.: Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 2005; 5: 344–50. MEDLINE
e19. Lui J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP et al.: Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 2006; 31: 198–202. MEDLINE
e20. Mathew P, Blackman M, Redla S et al.: Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine 30; 311–4. MEDLINE
e21. Mirza SK: Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to food and drug administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine 2005; 30: 1561–4. MEDLINE
e22. Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH et al.: Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: a report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: 465–9. MEDLINE
e23. Steiber JR, Donald GD: Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 55–60. MEDLINE
e24. Eysel P, Zöllner J, Heine J: Die künstliche Bandscheibe. Dtsch Arztebl 2000; 97(46): A 3092–6. VOLLTEXT
e25. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR: Degenerative disk disease: Assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166: 193–9. MEDLINE
e26. Anderson MW: Lumbar discography: an update. Semin Roentgenol 2004; 39: 52–67. MEDLINE
e27. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, Brito JL, Truong T: False positive findings on lumbar discography. Spine 1999; 24: 2542–51. MEDLINE
e28. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, Hayward C, Rossi M, Hagle C: Can discography cause long-term back symptoms in previously asymptomatic subjects? Spine 2000; 25: 1803–8. MEDLINE
e29. Nachemson A, Boden SD, McLain RF: Lumbar disc disease with discogenic pain. What surgical treatment is most effective? Spine 1996; 21: 1835–6. MEDLINE
e30. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB: The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940–53. MEDLINE
e31. Fernstrom. Acta Orthop Scand 1966; 10: 287–9.
e32. Szpalski J, Gunzburg R, Mayer M: Spine arthroplasty: a historial review. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 65–84. MEDLINE
e33. FDA: FDA approves artificial disc; another alternative to treat low back pain. Talk Paper 2004. http://www.fda.gov/bb5 topics, answers, ANS01320html
e34. FDA: New device approval. PRODISC®-L Total Disc Replacement – P050010. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf5/p050010a.pdf
e35. The Pro disc Book: Total disc replacement for degenerative disease in the lumbar spine. Spine Solutions GmbH, Tuttlingen 2003.