DÄ internationalArchive48/2007Modern Therapeutic Strategies for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Introduction

Review article

Modern Therapeutic Strategies for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Introduction

The conventional approach to coronary

Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104(48): A-3334

Klotz, S; Scheld, H H

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

1. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation 1983; 68: 939–50.
2. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM et al.: Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1–6. MEDLINE
3. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217–25. MEDLINE
4. Serruys PW, Ong AT, van Herwerden LA et al.: Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 575–81. MEDLINE
5. King SB, Kosinski AS, Guyton RA, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS: Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1116–21. MEDLINE
6. Kurbaan AS, Bowker TJ, Ilsley CD, Sigwart U, Rickards AF: Difference in the mortality of the CABRI diabetic and nondiabetic populations and its relation to coronary artery disease and the revascularization mode. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 947–50. MEDLINE
7. Hueb W, Lopes NH, Gersh BJ et al.: Five-year follow-up of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007; 115: 1082–9. MEDLINE
8. Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, Hearne MJ et al.: Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation 2005; 112: 371–6. MEDLINE
9. Kaehler J, Koester R, Billmann W et al.: 13-year follow-up of the German angioplasty bypass surgery investigation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2148–53. MEDLINE
10. Rodriguez AE, Baldi J, Fernandez PC et al.: Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 582–8. MEDLINE
11. Boodhwani M, Rubens FD, Sellke FW, Mesana TG, Ruel M: Mortality and myocardial infarction following surgical versus percutaneous revascularization of isolated left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 65–70. MEDLINE
12. Bakhai A, Hill RA, Dundar Y, Dickson R, Walley T: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 1: CD004588. MEDLINE
13. Erbel R, Di MC, Bartunek J et al.: Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 1869–75. MEDLINE
14. Legare JF, Buth KJ, King S et al.: Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation 2004; 109: 887–92. MEDLINE
15. Khan NE, De SA, Mister R et al.: A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 21–8. MEDLINE
16. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR et al.: Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and out-comes research. Circulation 2005; 111: 2858–64. MEDLINE
17. Rankin JS, Tuttle RH, Wechsler AS, Teichmann TL, Glower DD, Califf RM: Techniques and benefits of multiple internal mammary artery bypass at 20 years of follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 1008–15. MEDLINE
18. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM: The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 2005–12. MEDLINE
19. Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A et al.: Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: in-sight from a randomized trial. Circulation 2007; 115: 684–91. MEDLINE
20. Craver JM, Puskas JD, Weintraub WW et al.: 601 octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery: outcome and comparison with younger age groups. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1104–10. MEDLINE
21. Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, Sheikh A: Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review. J R Soc Med 2006; 99: 470–2. MEDLINE
22. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P et al.: Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 745–53. MEDLINE
23. Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J et al.: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: The VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 266–73. MEDLINE
24. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 965–70. MEDLINE
25. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G et al.: Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery by-pass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2174–83. MEDLINE
e1. Vineberg AM, Miller WD: An experimental study of the physiological role of an anastomosis between the left coronary circulation and the left internal mammary artery implanted in the left ventricular myocardium. Surg Forum 1950; 294–9. MEDLINE
e2. Murray G, Hilario J, Porcheron R, Roschlau W: Surgery of coronary heart disease. Angiology 1953; 4: 526–31. MEDLINE
e3. Boettcher W, Merkle F, Weitkemper HH: History of extracorporeal circulation: the invention and modification of blood pumps. J Extra Corpor Technol 2003; 35: 184–91. MEDLINE
e4. Favaloro RG: Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1968; 5: 334–9. MEDLINE
e5. Green GE: Rate of blood flow from the internal mammary artery. Surgery 1971; 70: 809–13. MEDLINE
e6. Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1333–9. MEDLINE
e7. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Chalmers TC: Ten-year results of the randomized control trials of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: tabular data compiled by the collaborative effort of the original trial investigators. Part 1 of 2. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1994; Doc No 145: 3987. MEDLINE
e8. Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ et al.: The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1743–51. MEDLINE
e9. Rodriguez AE, Mieres J, Fernandez-Pereira C et al.: Coronary stent thrombosis in the current drug-eluting stent era: insights from the ERACI III trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 205–7. MEDLINE
e10. Serruys PW, Lemos PA, van Hout BA: Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study part II (ARTS II). Heart 2004; 90: 995–8. MEDLINE
e11. Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F et al.: Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation 2006; 113: 2542–7. MEDLINE
e12. Lee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F et al.: Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 864–70. MEDLINE
e13. Yang ZK, Shen WF, Zhang RY et al.: Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease. J Interv Cardiol 2007; 20: 10–6. MEDLINE
e14. Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C et al.: Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 54–9. MEDLINE
e15. Ben-Gal Y, Moshkovitz Y, Nesher N et al.: Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1692–7. MEDLINE
e16. Lee MS, Jamal F, Kedia G et al.: Comparison of bypass surgery with drug-eluting stents for diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Int J Cardiol 2007. MEDLINE
e17. Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW et al.: The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 1194–204. MEDLINE
e18. Lee CH, Lim J, Low A et al.: Sirolimus-Eluting, Bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated Constant Stent (Cura(R)) in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Clinical and Angiographic Study (CURAMI Registry). J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: 182–5. MEDLINE
e19. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, Houghtaling PL, Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM: Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 142–8. MEDLINE
e20. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Isom OW et al.: A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 557–64. MEDLINE
e21. Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, Edmonds L, Rosengard BR: A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132: 1409–13. MEDLINE
e22. Takagi H, Tanabashi T, Kawai N, Kato T, Umemoto T: Off-pump coronary artery bypass sacrifices graft patency: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: e2–3. MEDLINE
e23. Magee MJ, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Mack MJ: Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1: II9–14. MEDLINE
e24. Al-Ruzzeh S, Ambler G, Asimakopoulos G et al.: Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery reduces risk-stratified morbidity and mortality: a United Kingdom Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Outcome. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1: II1–II8. MEDLINE
e25. Patel NC, Patel NU, Loulmet DF, McCabe JC, Subramanian VA: Emergency conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during attempted off-pump revascularization results in increased morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 655–61. MEDLINE
e26. Kettering K, Dapunt O, Baer FM: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 45: 255–64. MEDLINE
e27. Amodeo VJ, Donias HW, Dancona G, Hoover EL, Karamanoukian HL: The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology 2002; 53: 665–9. MEDLINE
e28. Damgaard S, Steinbruchel DA, Kjaergard HK: An update on internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2005; 20: 521–4. MEDLINE
e29. Gardner TJ: Searching for the second-best coronary artery bypass graft: is it the radial artery? Circulation 2007; 115: 678–80.
e30. Crusco F, Antoniella A, Papa V et al.: Midterm follow-up of patients receiving radial artery as coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detectorrow CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007; 12: 538–49. MEDLINE
e31. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Maiani M et al.: Perioperative and clinical-angiographic late outcome of total arterial myocardial revascularization according to different composite original graft techniques. Heart Vessels 2006; 21: 69–77. MEDLINE
e32. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE: A randomized comparison of radialartery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2302–9. MEDLINE
e33. Miyagi N, Oshima N, Shirai T, Sunamori M: Skeletonized harvesting improves the early-term and mid-term perfect patency of a radial artery graft. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54: 472–6. MEDLINE
e34. DGTHG: Leistungsstatistik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, 2005.
e35. Alexander KP, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH et al.: Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 731–8. MEDLINE
e36. Jensen BO, Hughes P, Rasmussen LS, Pedersen PU, Steinbruchel DA: Cognitive outcomes in elderly high-risk patients after off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial. Circulation 2006; 113: 2790–5. MEDLINE
e37. Bardakci H, Cheema FH, Topkara VK et al.: Discharge to home rates are significantly lower for octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 483–9. MEDLINE
e38. Johnson WM, Smith JM, Woods SE, Hendy MP, Hiratzka LF: Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: does age alone influence outcomes? Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1089–93. MEDLINE
e39. Peterson ED, Cowper PA, Jollis JG et al.: Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 24 461 patients aged 80 years or older. Circulation 1995; 92: II85–91. MEDLINE
e40. Potger KC, McMillan D, Connolly T, Southwell J, Dando H, O'Shaughnessy K: Coronary artery bypass grafting: an off-pump versus on-pump review. J Extra Corpor Technol 2002; 34: 260–6. MEDLINE