Correspondence
Chances and Risks in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: In Reply
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105(36): 616. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0616


Our article dealt only briefly with the risks and harms of live partial liver donors. It is correctly stated that our estimate of the lethality rate should be considered a lower bound. Any discussion of this subject should be based on the available data in the literature; a uniform classification of morbidity would be desirable. There have been three donor deaths in Germany to date. The long-term results of this still very new technique will only be known in a few years. As far as we know at present, however, donors have not experienced any major health impairment. With regard to the financial disadvantages accruing to the donor as a result of the donation, a clarification and solution of this problem by the transplantation societies is indeed overdue. The occupational accident insurance carriers ought to reassess the notion that loss of part of the liver results in a 20% to 40% loss of earning potential, because these figures are derived from oncological liver surgery, where the results will not be comparable to those of partial liver resection in a healthy donor.
Living donation is an alternative transplantation technique that is only justified when all other techniques, including whole-organ transplantation, split-liver transplantation, and auxiliary transplantation are put to use as well. The further development of split-liver transplantation, in particular, would be highly desirable.
DOI:10.3238/aerztebl.2008.0616
Prof. Dr. med. Dr. Dieter C. Bröring
Clinic for General and Thoracic Surgery
Schleswig-Holstein University Clinic
Arnold-Heller-Str. 7, D-24105 Kiel
Germany
E-mail: jessi.walter@gmx.de
Conflict of interest Statement
The authors of all letters and of the reply state that they have no conflict of interest as defined by the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.