Review article
Prostatitis and Male Pelvic Pain Syndrome
Diagnosis and Treatment
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(11): 175-83. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0175
; ; ; ;
Background: The prostatitis syndrome is a multifactorial condition of largely unknown etiology. The new NIH classification divides the prostatitis syndrome into a number of subtypes: acute bacterial prostatitis, chronic bacterial prostatitis, inflammatory and noninflammatory chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and asymptomatic prostatitis.
Methods: This article is based on a selective review of the literature regarding the assessment and management of the prostatitis syndrome and on a recently published consensus statement of the International Prostatitis Collaboration Network.
Results: Pathogenic organisms can be cultured only in acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis. These conditions should be treated with antibiotics, usually fluoroquinolones, for an adequate period of time. 90% of patients with prostatitis syndrome, however, suffer not from bacterial prostatitis but from chronic (abacterial) prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). It remains unclear whether CP/CPPS is of infectious origin, and therefore the utility of a trial of antimicrobial treatment is debatable. Treatment with alpha receptor blockers is recommended if functional subvesical obstruction is documented or suspected. Symptomatic therapy for pelvic pain should be given as well.
Conclusions: The prostatitis syndrome is a complex condition with a tendency toward chronification. It is important, therefore, that the patient be fully informed about the diagnostic uncertainties and the possibility that treatment may meet with less than complete success.
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(11): 175–83
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0175
Key words: prostatitis, chronic disease, NIH classification, fluorquinolones, alpha blockers
Methods: This article is based on a selective review of the literature regarding the assessment and management of the prostatitis syndrome and on a recently published consensus statement of the International Prostatitis Collaboration Network.
Results: Pathogenic organisms can be cultured only in acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis. These conditions should be treated with antibiotics, usually fluoroquinolones, for an adequate period of time. 90% of patients with prostatitis syndrome, however, suffer not from bacterial prostatitis but from chronic (abacterial) prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). It remains unclear whether CP/CPPS is of infectious origin, and therefore the utility of a trial of antimicrobial treatment is debatable. Treatment with alpha receptor blockers is recommended if functional subvesical obstruction is documented or suspected. Symptomatic therapy for pelvic pain should be given as well.
Conclusions: The prostatitis syndrome is a complex condition with a tendency toward chronification. It is important, therefore, that the patient be fully informed about the diagnostic uncertainties and the possibility that treatment may meet with less than complete success.
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(11): 175–83
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0175
Key words: prostatitis, chronic disease, NIH classification, fluorquinolones, alpha blockers


The objective of the current review article is to describe practical management of the complex syndrome of prostatitis. For this purpose, the authors have performed a selective review of the literature in "Medline" and "Pubmed," together with a recently published consensus report from the International Prostatitis Collaboration Network on this theme (1).
Definitions
In accordance with the classification of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), prostatitis syndrome is classified into four categories (5).
Acute bacterial prostatitis (ABP), category I
ABP is characterized by severe obstructive and irritative symptoms of the lower respiratory tract, pain in the area of the prostate, and acute bacterial urinary tract infection (UTI), with systemic involvement.
Chronic bacterial prostatatis (CBP), category II
CBP is caused by chronic bacterial infection of the prostate, with or without prostatic symptoms. The same bacterial pathogen is often found with recurrent urinary tract infection.
Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS)
CP/CPPS is split into inflammatory CP/CPPS (category IIIa) and noninflammatory CP/CPPS (IIIb). CP/CPPS is characterized by chronic pelvic pain and often by difficulties in micturition, without detection of an infection of the urinary tract.
Asymptomatic prostatitis, category IV
In asymptomatic prostatitis, inflammation of the prostate is detectable, although the patient does not report any symptoms or difficulties in this area.
Etiology and pathogenesis
Acute bacterial prostatitis
ABP is a severe systemic infection. It may arise spontaneously (90% of cases) or after manipulations on the urogenital tract (6). Pathogens include Escherichia coli, other enterobacteria, enterococci, and occasionally Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Complications from ABP include acute urinary retention, epididymitis, prostatic abscess, urosepsis, and CBP. Development of urosepsis or CBP can be prevented by timely and effective therapy. A prostatic abscess develops in about 3% of all cases; ABP after manipulations significantly more often leads to an abscess than does spontaneous ABP (6).
Chronic bacterial prostatitis
5% to 10% of patients with the diagnosis of prostatitis syndrome are suffering from CBP (1). This is often triggered by an infection of the urinary tract. The pathogen spectrum includes that of complex urinary tract infections, with gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, although the latter often occur only transiently. Animal experiments have shown that chronic infection leads to the formation of a biofilm in the prostatic acini. This means that the pathogens form colonies there with special growth conditions (7).
Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
The etiology of CP/CPPS is often unclear. Five different causes have been discussed—infection, detrusor-sphincter dysfunction, immunological dysfunction, interstitial cystitis, and neuropathic pain (1):
- Prokaryotic DNA sequences are found in some patients with CP/CPPS IIIa and this may indicate that there are pathogenic micro-organisms in the prostate which cannot be cultured (1).
- It has frequently been reported that patients with CP/CPPS suffer functional obstruction during bladder emptying. Inadequate relaxation of the bladder neck during micturition leads to turbulent infravesicular urinary flow, with urinary reflux into the prostatic canaliculi. This results in chemically triggered inflammation of the prostate with release of mediators. The effects of these include stimulation of the pain nerve fibers (1).
- Other studies have shown that patients with CP/CPPS exhibit raised levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and lowered levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as evidence of autoimmune processes (1).
- An American group has found a positive intravesicular potassium sensitivity test in patients with CP/CPPS. This may indicate interstitial cystitis. The authors concluded that CP/CPPS and interstitial cystitis share the feature of uroepithelial dysfunction (1). These findings have not yet been confirmed.
- There is experimental evidence for an axis between sensory nerves and mast cells as a pain mechanism. In an animal model of prostatitis, it has been shown that neural structures lie extremely close to prostate glands. Spinal neurons are stimulated through mast cell–induced PAR-2 (protease-activated receptor-2) activation and this may produce pain.
Asymptomatic prostatitis
Chronic inflammation can lead to the release of reactive oxygen species and these not only have deleterious effects on sperm parameters, but also induce other damage to cell walls and DNA in prostate epithelial cells and could even contribute to prostatic neoplasias in this way (4). Serum PSA (prostate-specific antigen) may be raised and then return to normal values once the inflammation decreases (8).
Diagnosis
The recommended evaluation of prostatitis syndrome is illustrated in box 1 (gif ppt) and in figures 1 (gif ppt), 2 (gif ppt), and 3 (gif ppt) (1).
Acute bacterial prostatitis
Acute bacterial prostatitis (NIH category I) is an acute clinical picture, characterized by intense perianal pain, fever, and chills. There are dysuric and pollakisuric symptoms, which can peak in urinary retention. Prostatic abscesses are possible, as is urosepsis, the most severe complication (1). ABP is diagnosed microbiologically by detecting the pathogens in the midstream urine. Prostatic massage is contraindicated. Regularly increased PSA values are a serum marker; these regress after antibiotic therapy. Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate (TRUS) should be carried out to exclude prostatic abscess.
Chronic bacterial prostatitis
The symptoms of CBP (NIH category II) cannot be distinguished from those of CP/CPPS (NIH category III). The symptom complex can be split into
- pain,
- irritative symptoms during micturition, and
- sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, loss of libido).
Recurrent infections of the urinary tract with the same pathogen are typical. The patient may be free of symptoms between the episodes (1).
CBP is demonstrated either with a 4-glass test (initial urine, midstream urine, expressed prostatic secretion, urine after prostatic massage) (9) (figure 4 gif ppt) or with a 2-glass test (midstream urine and post prostatic massage urine) (1). The two diagnostic methods can be regarded as clinically equivalent. The bacterial count in the prostatic secretion and/or in the post prostatic massage urine should be 10-fold greater than in midstream urine. In addition, leukocytes or noncellular markers of inflammation (for example, leukocyte elastase or interleukin-8) must be detected in prostatic secretion and/or in post prostatic massage urine. A bacteriological investigation of ejaculate alone is not adequate, as the microbiological findings only agree with the results of the 2-glass or 4-glass tests in about half the cases (1). The test for leukocytes in ejaculate must be performed with special stains (for example, peroxidase stain), to distinguish leukocytes microscopically from the precursors of spermatozoa (table 1 gif ppt).
Chronic pelvic pain syndrome
In most patients, the dominant symptom is pain. This tends to be concentrated in the anorectal and genital areas, but may also affect the whole pelvic area (1). The symptoms should have been present for at least 3 months within the previous 6 months. The symptoms must be validated with the standard questionnaire of the National Institute of Health—Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) (10). This questionnaire has three sections—pain, micturition, and quality of life. Experience has shown that the section on pain provides the best discrimination between men with and without CP/CPPS. From a pain score of >10, it is generally assumed that the patient has manifest prostatitis symptoms (11). Changes in the overall score correlate with the therapeutic response (15). Depression and psychosocial symptoms are concentrated in patients with CP/CPPS and these must be addressed at the same time (11). Cooperation with a psychologist or a physician trained in psychosomatic medicine is helpful here. The 4-glass or 2-glass tests and the ejaculate test can be used to distinguish between the inflammatory and noninflammatory forms (12). The exact limits in the ejaculate for distinguishing between inflammatory and noninflammatory CP/CPPS are currently being discussed (table 2 gif ppt) (13, 14).
If there is evidence for obstructive micturition symptoms, this must be investigated with uroflowmetry and residual urine, possibly with cystomanometry. Cystoscopy, computed tomography, and MRI of the prostate are not recommended (1). Possible differential diagnoses are diseases of the rectum, the external genitals, the urethra, and the bladder, as the nerves of other pelvic organs may interact with prostatic innervation (15).
Asymptomatic prostatitis
Asymptomatic prostatitis is diagnosed by chance, for example, during investigation of infertility or prostatic carcinoma. The histological diagnosis of prostatitis should employ the standardized classification of the International Prostatitis Network (16). Whether histologically manifest chronic prostatitis with inflammatory proliferative atrophy can develop into prostatic carcinoma is currently a matter of violent controversy (4, 17).
Treatment
The recommended treatment of prostatitis syndrome is shown in box 2 (gif ppt) and in figures 1, 2, and 3 (1).
Acute bacterial prostatitis
Antibiotic therapy is started empirically. Fluoroquinolones are the most effective antibiotics for sensitive bacteria. After resistance has been determined, specific oral antibiotic therapy should be performed for at least 2 to 4 weeks. The recurrence rate for ABP is about 13% (6). If there is residual urine, alpha-receptor blockers should be used. If there is urine retention, a single-use or indwelling suprapubic catheter should be laid. At least from 1 cm in size, a prostatic abscess should be treated by puncture and drainage. These recommendations are based on an international consensus (1).
Chronic bacterial prostatitis
Fluoroquinolones penetrate relatively well into the prostate and are therefore the therapy of choice for CBP. They should be administered for 4 weeks. If the pathogen is resistant to fluoroquinolones, therapy with cotrimoxazole for 3 months is recommended (1).
For recurrent CBP, either each episode can be treated with antibiotics, or long-term antibiotic prophylaxis can be performed for at least 6 months. Surgical procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and radical prostatectomy must be regarded as the last resort, or as therapy for concomitant obstruction (TURP) (1, 18). The results of selected studies are shown in table 3 (gif ppt).
Chronic pelvic pain syndrome
As functional obstruction may cause this syndrome, therapy with alpha-receptor blockers is of great significance. Therapy for at least 6 months is recommended, as this leads to down-regulation of the alpha-receptors in the prostate (1). Muscle relaxants may be used if there is evidence for functional abnormalities in the pelvic floor muscle. Intraprostatic injection of botulinum toxin A is currently being investigated in these patients (19) and may offer a new therapeutic approach.
Another pathogenetic hypothesis is chronic infection with bacteria that are difficult to detect and cannot be cultured. For this reason, it is justified to treat CP/CPPS IIIa patients with fluoroquinolones if they have previously not been exposed to antibiotics—just as with CBP patients (1). If the symptoms do not improve within two weeks, antibiotic therapy should not be continued.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase, leading to a favorable effect on prostatic inflammation (20). For this reason, patients with dominant pain may be given NSAIDs. Some herbal medicines act in a similar manner and could possibly be used, although they have not yet been subjected to adequate clinical studies (1). Analgesics with other modes of action (e.g. central) are indicated for intense pain. Anticholinergic drugs may be used for symptomatic treatment of patients with dominant micturition problems, including urinary urgency linked to irritable bladder.
If a patient exhibits the symptoms of CP/CPPS, but without bacterial or inflammatory findings, the clinical picture is often classified as psychosomatic (21). The diagnosis of a somatoform disorder must be carefully considered in the context of other possible diagnoses, in close cooperation with a urologist. In such cases, it is particularly important to define accompanying depressive symptoms and these must be diagnosed and treated separately from the actual prostatitis symptoms. Sexual problems with the partner are frequently accompanied by significant consequences for the relationship (22).
Physical options include repetitive prostate massage or methods to apply energy to the prostate. There is not enough evidence for these approaches and they are therefore controversial.
If there are anatomical changes such as cysts in the prostate and these cause infravesicular obstruction, surgical procedures should be performed to remove the obstruction.
Table 4 (gif ppt) shows the results of selected placebo-controlled studies.
Asymptomatic prostatitis
It is currently accepted that patients with asymptomatic prostatitis do not require additional diagnosis or therapy (1). There are nevertheless several clinical situations in which additional measures may be indicated:
- Asymptomatic prostatitis is frequently accompanied by an increase in PSA (23). In these cases, drug therapy (antibiotics, nonsteroidal antirheumatics) appears to reduce PSA (8). In such situations it is still necessary to take a biopsy to exclude prostatic carcinoma.
- The role of asymptomatic prostatitis in the investigation of infertility is still unclear. There is some evidence that prostatitis can have an unfavorable effect on ejaculate parameters (24). It follows that antibiotic or anti-inflammatory treatment might improve ejaculate parameters (24).
- Infection plays an important role in the clarification of hemospermia, particularly in younger patients (<40 years) (25).
Outlook
Acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis are clearly defined clinical pictures with unambiguous recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. As resistance to fluoroquinolones is increasing, therapy may be much less successful in future.
In the final analysis, the etiology of CP/CPPS is unclear and this is why there is a wide variety of possible different therapies. Treatment is based on symptomatic therapy. It is important for the patient that he should be informed as soon as possible about his condition, including the diagnostic steps and the possible therapies, and that there is a specific plan for his diagnosis and treatment. This is the only way to develop a trusting relationship between doctor and patient. This is especially important, as it often happens that several unsuccessful attempts are made at treatment, before an acceptable result is reached for the individual patient.
There will certainly be many changes in future in the management of asymptomatic prostatitis, as chronic prostatic inflammation may be important in several other conditions, such as prostatic carcinoma (4, 17), benign prostatic hyperplasia (3), or infertility (24). In theory, it may be possible in future that early diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic prostatitis could lead to the prevention of "inflammation-associated" prostatic carcinoma. In the therapy of infertility, prostatic infection might be one of the few exogenous causes which is treatable.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors Wagenlehner, Bschleipfer, Brähler, and Weidner declare that no conflict of interest exists according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Professor Naber reports links to Bayer, Bionorica, Eumedica Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi, MUCOS Pharma, Nano Vibronix, Ocean Spray Cranberries, OM Pharma, Peninsula/Johnson&Johnson/Janssen-Cilag, Pharmatoka, Protez, Sanofi-Aventis UroVision, and Zambon.
Manuscript received on 1 February 2008, revised version accepted on
27 August 2008.
Translated from the original German by Rodney A. Yeates, M.A., Ph.D.
Corresponding author
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Florian M.E. Wagenlehner
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH – Standort Gießen
Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 7
35385 Gießen, Germany
Wagenlehner@AOL.com
1.
Schaeffer AJ, Anderson, RU, Krieger JN et al.: Statement on prostatitis. The assessment and management of male pelvic pain syndrome, including prostatitis. In: Edition MLUTD, editor. 6th International Conference on New Developments in Prostate Cancer and Prostate Diseases. Paris: Health Publications 2006; 343–75.
2.
Weidner W, Schiefer HG, Krauss H et al.: Chronic prostatitis: a thorough search for etiologically involved microorganisms in 1,461 patients. Infection 1991; 19 Suppl 3: 119–25.
3.
Nickel JC, Downey J, Young I, Boag S: Asymptomatic inflammation and/or infection in benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 1999; 84(9): 976–81.
4.
Nelson WG, De Marzo AM, DeWeese TL, Isaacs WB: The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. J Urol 2004; 172: 6-11; discussion 11–2.
5.
Krieger JN, Nyberg L Jr., Nickel JC: NIH consensus definition and classification of prostatitis. JAMA 1999; 282(3): 236–7.
6.
Millan-Rodriguez F, Palou J, Bujons-Tur A et al.: Acute bacterial prostatitis: two different sub-categories according to a previous manipulation of the lower urinary tract. World J Urol 2006; 24(1): 45–50.
7.
Nickel JC, Olson ME, Costerton JW: Rat model of experimental bacterial prostatitis. Infection 1991; 19 Suppl 3: 126–30.
8.
Potts JM: Prospective identification of National Institutes of Health category IV prostatitis in men with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2000; 164(5): 1550–3.
9.
Meares EM, Stamey TA: Bacteriologic localization patterns in bacterial prostatitis and urethritis. Invest Urol 1968; 5(5): 492–518.
10.
Hochreiter W, Ludwig M, Weidner W et al.: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. The German version. Urologe A 2001; 40(1): 16–7.
11.
Schneider H, Wilbrandt K, Ludwig M, Beutel M, Weidner W: Prostate-related pain in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BJU Int 2005; 95(2): 238–43.
12.
Weidner W, Anderson RU: Evaluation of acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis and diagnostic management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome with special reference to infection/inflammation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 31 Suppl 1: 91–5.
13.
Penna G, Mondaini N, Amuchastegui S et al.: Seminal plasma cytokines and chemokines in prostate inflammation: interleukin 8 as a predictive biomarker in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2007; 51(2): 524–33; discussion 533.
14.
Ludwig M, Vidal A, Diemer T, Pabst W, Failing K, Weidner W: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: seminal markers of inflammation. World J Urol 2003; 21(2): 82–5.
15.
Wesselmann U, Burnett AL, Heinberg LJ: The urogenital and rectal pain syndromes. Pain 1997; 73(3): 269–94.
16.
Nickel JC, True LD, Krieger JN, Berger RE, Boag AH, Young ID: Consensus development of a histopathological classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation. BJU Int 2001; 87(9): 797–805.
17.
Wagenlehner FM, Elkahwaji JE, Algaba F et al.: The role of inflammation and infection in the pathogenesis of prostate carcinoma. BJU Int 2007; 100(4): 733–7.
18.
Frazier HA, Spalding TH, Paulson DF: Total prostatoseminal vesiculectomy in the treatment of debilitating perineal pain. J Urol 1992; 148: 409–11.
19.
Chuang YC, Yoshimura N, Wu M et al.: Intraprostatic capsaicin injection as a novel model for nonbacterial prostatitis and effects of botulinum toxin A. Eur Urol 2007; 51(4): 1119–27.
20.
Bach DW, Walker H: How important are prostaglandins in the urology of man. Urol Int 1982; 37: 160–71.
21.
Csef HR, Rodewig K, Sökeland J: Somatoforme (funktionelle) Störungen des Urogenitalsystems. Dtsch Arztebl 2000; 97(23): 1600–4.
22.
Smith KB, Tripp D, Pukall C, Nickel JC: Predictors of sexual and relationship functioning in couples with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. J Sex Med 2007; 4(3): 734–44.
23.
Stancik I, Luftenegger W, Klimpfinger M, Muller MM, Hoeltl W: Effect of NIH-IV prostatitis on free and free-to-total PSA. Eur Urol 2004; 46(6): 760–4.
24.
Weidner W, Wagenlehner FM, Marconi M, Pilatz A, Pantke KH, Diemer T: Acute bacterial prostatitis and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: andrological implications. Andrologia 2008; 40(2): 105–12.
25.
Ahmad I, Krishna NS: Hemospermia. J Urol 2007; 177(5): 1613–8.
e1.
Schaeffer AJ, Anderson RU, Krieger JN et al: Consensus statement on prostatitis. The assessment and management of male pelvic pain syndrome, including prostatitis. In: Edition MLUTD, editor. 6th International Conference on New Developments in Prostate Cancer and Prostate Diseases. Paris: Health Publications 2006: 343–75.
e2.
Schaeffer AJ, Darras FS: The efficacy of norfloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis refractory to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and/or carbenicillin. J Urol 1990; 144(3): 690–3.
e3.
Peppas T, Petrikkos G, Deliganni V, Zoumboulis P, Koulentianos E, Giamarellou H: Efficacy of long-term therapy with norfloxacin in chronic bacterial prostatitis. J Chemother 1989; 1(Suppl 4): 867–8.
e4.
Pust RA, Ackenheil-Koppe HR, Gilbert P, Weidner W: Clinical efficacy of ofloxacin (tarivid) in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis: preliminary results. J Chemother 1989; 1(Suppl 4): 869–71.
e5.
Weidner W, Schiefer HG, Dalhoff A: Treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis with ciprofloxacin. Results of a one-year follow-up study. Am J Med 1987; 82: 280–3.
e6.
Weidner W, Schiefer HG, Brahler E: Refractory chronic bacterial prostatitis: a re-evaluation of ciprofloxacin treatment after a median follow-up of 30 months. J Urol 1991; 146: 350–2.
e7.
Pfau A: The treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Infection 1991; 3(Suppl 19): 160–4.
e8.
Naber KG, Busch W, Focht J: Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis: a prospective, non-comparative multicentre clinical trial with long-term follow-up. The German Prostatitis Study Group. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 14: 143–9.
e9.
Naber KG: Lomefloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002; 20: 18–27.
e10.
Bundrick W, Heron SP, Ray P et al.: Levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Urology 2003; 62: 537–41.
e11.
Naber KG, Roscher K, Botto H, Schaefer V: Oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 32: 145–53.
e12.
Nickel JC, Downey J, Clark J et al.: Levofloxacin for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Urology 2003; 62: 614–7.
e13.
Cheah PY, Liong ML, Yuen KH et al.: Terazosin therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized placebo controlled trial. J Urol 2003; 169: 592–6.
e14.
Mehik A, Alas P, Nickel JC, Sarpola A, Helstrom PJ: Alfuzosin treatment for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Urology 2003; 62: 425–9.
e15.
Nickel JC, Narayan P, McKay J, Doyle C: Treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome with tamsulosin: a randomized double blind trial. J Urol 2004; 171: 1594–7.
e16.
Alexander RB, Propert KJ, Schaeffer AJ et al.: Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 581–9.
e17.
Nickel JC, Pontari M, Moon T et al.: A randomized, placebo controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rofecoxib in the treatment of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis. J Urol 2003; 169: 1401–5.
e18.
Nickel JC, Johnston B, Downey J et al.: Pentosan polysulfate therapy for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (chronic pelvic pain syndrome category IIIA): a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Urology 2000; 56: 413–7.
e19.
Nickel JC, Downey J, Pontari MA, Shoskes DA, Zeitlin SI: A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis). BJU Int 2004; 93: 991–5.
e20.
De Rose AF, Gallo F, Giglio M, Carmignani G: Role of mepartricin in category III chronic nonbacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled trial. Urology 2004; 63: 13–6.
e21.
Shoskes DA, Zeitlin SI, Shahed A, Rajfer J: Quercetin in men with category III chronic prostatitis: a preliminary prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Urology 1999; 54: 960–3.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen: PD Dr. med. Wagenlehner, Dr. med. Dr. phil. Bschleipfer, Prof. Dr. med. Weidner; Technische Universität München: Prof. Dr. med. Naber; Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig: Prof. Dr. rer. biol. hum. Brähler
Box 1
Box 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
-
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 201710.3238/arztebl.2017.0339
-
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 202110.3892/etm.2021.10398
-
Current Urology Reports, 202310.1007/s11934-023-01150-z
-
Der Urologe, 202010.1007/s00120-020-01174-0
-
Book, 202110.1007/978-3-662-61492-1_4