DÄ internationalArchiveReferences
References

Review article

The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017; 114: 777-84. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777

Doenst, T; Diab, M; Sponholz, C; Bauer, M; Färber, G

1. Kalk H: Bemerkungen zur Technik der Laparoskopie und Beschreibung neuer laparoskopischer Instrumente. Med Klin 1955; 50: 696–9 MEDLINE
2. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou AI, Granderath FA: Past, present, and future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS 2015; 19: e2015.00052.
3. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al.: Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 421–6; discussion 7–8 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
4. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al.: Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III 1996; 319: 219–23 MEDLINE
5. Doenst T, Lamelas J: Do we have enough evidence for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery? A critical review of scientific and non-scientific information. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2017; 58: 613–23.
6. Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, et al.: German Heart Surgery Report 2015: The annual updated registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64: 462–74 CrossRef MEDLINE
7. Doll N, Borger MA, Hain J, et al.: Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: S1318–22 CrossRef
8. Johnston DR, Roselli EE: Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4: 140–7 MEDLINE PubMed Central
9. Merk DR, Lehmann S, Holzhey DM, et al.: Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47: 11–7; discussion 7 CrossRef MEDLINE
10. Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Miceli A, et al.: Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: a propensity score analysis on 1280 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: e167–72 CrossRef MEDLINE
11. Grossi EA, LaPietra A, Ribakove GH, et al.: Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 708–13 CrossRef MEDLINE
12. Ryan WH, Brinkman WT, Dewey TM, Mack MJ, Prince SL, Herbert MA: Mitral valve surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and port access groups. J Heart Valve Dis 2010; 19: 51–8; discussion 9 MEDLINE
13. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, Hargrove WC, 3rd: Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: a propensity score analysis of early outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1185–90 CrossRef MEDLINE
14. Sundermann SH, Czerny M, Falk V: Open vs. minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: surgical technique, indications and results. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2015; 6: 160–6 CrossRef MEDLINE
15. Lamelas J, Williams RF, Mawad M, LaPietra A: Complications associated with femoral cannulation during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 1927–32 CrossRef MEDLINE
16.Semsroth S, Matteucci Gothe R, Raith YR, et al.: Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques and median sternotomy in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104: 877–83 CrossRef MEDLINE
17. Foghsgaard S, Schmidt TA, Kjaergard HK: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time. Tex Heart Inst J 2009; 36: 293–7 MEDLINE PubMed Central
18. Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, et al.: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right minithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 133–7 CrossRef MEDLINE
19. Mihaljevic T, Koprivanac M, Kelava M, et al.: Value of robotically assisted surgery for mitral valve disease. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 679–86 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
20. Moschovas A, Amorim PA, Nold M, et al.: Percutaneous cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive surgery is associated with reduced groin complications. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 25: 377–83 CrossRef MEDLINE
21. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Mohr FW: Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation 2013; 128: 483–91 CrossRef MEDLINE
22. Ariyaratnam P, Loubani M, Griffin SC: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: comparison of long-term outcomes. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2015; 23: 814–21 CrossRef MEDLINE
23. Gilmanov D, Farneti PA, Ferrarini M, et al.: Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study dagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 20: 732–41; discussion 41 CrossRef MEDLINE
24. Glauber M, Miceli A, Canarutto D, et al.: Early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right minithoracotomy: a 10-year experience in 1604 patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 10: 181 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
25. Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, Fuster V, Adams DH: A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 308–12 CrossRef MEDLINE
26. Goldstone AB, Atluri P, Szeto WY, et al.: Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 748–56 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
27. Stolinski J, Plicner D, Grudzien G, et al.: A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152: 1030–9 CrossRef MEDLINE
28. Keyl C, Staier K, Pingpoh C, et al.: Unilateral pulmonary oedema after minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right anterolateral minithoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47: 1097–102 MEDLINE
29. Tutschka MP, Bainbridge D, Chu MW, Kiaii B, Jones PM: Unilateral postoperative pulmonary edema after minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99: 115–22 CrossRef MEDLINE
30. Irisawa Y, Hiraoka A, Totsugawa T, et al.: Re-expansion pulmonary oedema after minimally invasive cardiac surgery with right mini-thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 500–5 CrossRef MEDLINE
31. Lamelas J: Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the „Miami Method“. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4: 33–7 MEDLINE PubMed Central
32. Lio A, Murzi M, Solinas M, Glauber M: Minimally invasive triple valve surgery through a right minithoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 2424–7 CrossRef MEDLINE
33. Kitamura T, Stuklis RG, Edwards J: Redo mitral valve operation via right minithoracotomy—“no touch“ technique. Int Heart J 2011; 52: 107–9 CrossRef
34. Lichtenberg A, Klima U, Paeschke H, et al.: Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 487–91 CrossRef CrossRef
35. Ruel M, Shariff MA, Lapierre H, et al.: Results of the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting angiographic patency study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 203–8 CrossRef MEDLINE
36. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al.: 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2477–84 CrossRef
37. Head SJ, Davierwala PM, Serruys PW, et al.: Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2821–30 CrossRef MEDLINE
38. Sipahi I, Akay MH, Dagdelen S, Blitz A, Alhan C: Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 223–30 CrossRef MEDLINE
39. Opolski MP, Staruch AD, Jakubczyk M, et al.: CT angiography for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9: 1059–70 CrossRef MEDLINE
e1. Ahangar AG, Charag AH, Wani ML, et al.: Comparing aortic valve replacement through right anterolateral thoracotomy with median sternotomy. Int Cardiovasc Res J 2013; 7: 90–4.
e2. Aris A, Camara ML, Montiel J, Delgado LJ, Galan J, Litvan H: Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1583–7; discussion 7–8 CrossRef
e3. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G: Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 460–5; discussion 5–6 CrossRef
e4. Calderon J, Richebe P, Guibaud JP, et al.: Prospective randomized study of early pulmonary evaluation of patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery performed by ministernotomy or total median sternotomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23: 795–801 CrossRef MEDLINE
e5. Dogan S, Dzemali O, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al.: Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12: 76–80.
e6. Machler HE, Bergmann P, Anelli-Monti M, et al.: Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1001–5 CrossRef
e7. Moustafa MA, Abdelsamad AA, Zakaria G, Omarah MM: Minimal vs median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007; 15: 472–5 CrossRef MEDLINE
e8. Dogan S, Aybek T, Risteski PS, et al.: Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 492–8 CrossRef MEDLINE
e9. Nasso G, Bonifazi R, Romano V, et al.: Three-year results of repaired Barlow mitral valves via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy in a randomized trial. Cardiology 2014; 128: 97–105 CrossRef MEDLINE
e10. Speziale G, Nasso G, Esposito G, et al.: Results of mitral valve repair for Barlow disease (bileaflet prolapse) via right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 77–83 CrossRef MEDLINE
e11. Santana O, Reyna J, Grana R, Buendia M, Lamas GA, Lamelas J: Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 406–10 CrossRef MEDLINE
e12. Santana O, Reyna J, Benjo AM, Lamas GA, Lamelas J: Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 648–52 CrossRef MEDLINE
e13. Attia RQ, Hickey GL, Grant SW, et al.: Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched study from the UK National Data. Innovations (Phila) 2016; 11: 15–23; discussion.
e14. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, et al.: Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1599–604 CrossRef MEDLINE
e15. Bowdish ME, Hui DS, Cleveland JD, et al.: A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 456–63 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
e16. Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM, et al.: Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 131–5 CrossRef
e17. Doll N, Borger MA, Hain J, et al.: Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: S1318–22.
e18. Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, et al.: Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46: 221–6; discussion 6–7.
e19. Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, et al.: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: a real-world multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149: 1060–5 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
e20. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, et al.: Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1222–6 CrossRef MEDLINE
e21. Glower DD, Desai BS, Hughes GC, Milano CA, Gaca JG: Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis. Innovations (Phila) 2014; 9: 75–81; discussion CrossRef MEDLINE
e22.Johnston DR, Atik FA, Rajeswaran J, et al.: Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 852–8. e3.
e23. Klokocovnik T, Kersnik Levart T, Bunc M: Double venous drainage through the superior vena cava in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study. Croat Med J 2012; 53: 11–6 CrossRef PubMed Central
e24. Neely RC, Boskovski MT, Gosev I, et al.: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women‘s Hospital experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4: 38–48.
e25. Stamou SC, Kapetanakis EI, Lowery R, Jablonski KA, Frankel TL, Corso PJ: Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-adjusted analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1101–6 CrossRef
e26. Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Easterwood R, et al.: Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 1471–7; discussion 7–8.
e27. Tang P, Onaitis M, Gaca JG, Milano CA, Stafford-Smith M, Glower D: Right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve surgery: a propensity matched study. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 575–81 CrossRef MEDLINE
e28. Zhai J, Wei L, Huang B, Wang C, Zhang H, Yin K: Minimally invasive mitral valve replacement is a safe and effective surgery for patients with rheumatic valve disease: a retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e7193 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central